It doesn't mean shit that the ABs suck? tell that to people who backed the ABs -16.5 pts before their match vs SAF got underway, doing so because they expected a performance that didn't suck. Tell that to those who backed the ABs -24.5 pts before their match against Argentina got underway, doing so bbecause they expected a performance that didn't suck (woohoo, they scored a bunch of pts in the final 10 mins to hide the real effort they put in that night). Any clown who takes Aussie's pts when they play the ABs deserves what they get.
Here's a word to the wise, the ABs will NOT cover both spreads for their games in SAF & Argentina. Why? cause they suck. You can keep on dreaming that they're a good side because of performances relative to other shit houses, I'm not so blind. And my betting account is reaping the reward for my lack of one-eyedness. I'm sorry yours is suffering for it. Keep laying the points to teams other than Aussie, and keep losing.
0
It doesn't mean shit that the ABs suck? tell that to people who backed the ABs -16.5 pts before their match vs SAF got underway, doing so because they expected a performance that didn't suck. Tell that to those who backed the ABs -24.5 pts before their match against Argentina got underway, doing so bbecause they expected a performance that didn't suck (woohoo, they scored a bunch of pts in the final 10 mins to hide the real effort they put in that night). Any clown who takes Aussie's pts when they play the ABs deserves what they get.
Here's a word to the wise, the ABs will NOT cover both spreads for their games in SAF & Argentina. Why? cause they suck. You can keep on dreaming that they're a good side because of performances relative to other shit houses, I'm not so blind. And my betting account is reaping the reward for my lack of one-eyedness. I'm sorry yours is suffering for it. Keep laying the points to teams other than Aussie, and keep losing.
So the all blacks suck for not covering massive lines now, you never fail to surprise. wouldn't it be nice if there wasn't some shit team who just covered their line week in and week out? god damnit so many teams suck!
the all blacks 99% find a way to win with their superior fitness and playmakers, thats what makes them such a great team. If you've played sport I'm sure you'd know the goal is to go out and win at all cost. The coach doesn't say lads go out and win by -16.5 points. At the end of the day it's all about winning.
I took all blacks -9.5 at halftime if that helps
0
So the all blacks suck for not covering massive lines now, you never fail to surprise. wouldn't it be nice if there wasn't some shit team who just covered their line week in and week out? god damnit so many teams suck!
the all blacks 99% find a way to win with their superior fitness and playmakers, thats what makes them such a great team. If you've played sport I'm sure you'd know the goal is to go out and win at all cost. The coach doesn't say lads go out and win by -16.5 points. At the end of the day it's all about winning.
the all blacks 99% find a way to win with their superior fitness and playmakers, thats what makes them such a great team.
As a bettor, why do I care if the ABs win SU at "minus a million" odds? I mean, if you want to lay 100 bucks to get a return of 10 dollars profit, and are willing to sweat out SAF missing a million penalty goals for you to make that lousy 10 bucks profit, all power to you. This is a team laying wayy too many points relative to its real ability, hence opponents who are not strong themselves - sans Australia, whose spreads are actually too small when it comes to AB games - are covering these spreads easily.
The ABs will without a doubt again be overvalued in SAF and ARG, and the suckers will continue to eat it up, cause the men in Black are "so great" and everyone else sucks. Yeah, the rest DO suck, but then so do the ABs. World rugby is shit at the moment, there's not a team in existence that the AB or Wallaby teams from the late 80s/early 90s wouldn't eat alive.
0
the all blacks 99% find a way to win with their superior fitness and playmakers, thats what makes them such a great team.
As a bettor, why do I care if the ABs win SU at "minus a million" odds? I mean, if you want to lay 100 bucks to get a return of 10 dollars profit, and are willing to sweat out SAF missing a million penalty goals for you to make that lousy 10 bucks profit, all power to you. This is a team laying wayy too many points relative to its real ability, hence opponents who are not strong themselves - sans Australia, whose spreads are actually too small when it comes to AB games - are covering these spreads easily.
The ABs will without a doubt again be overvalued in SAF and ARG, and the suckers will continue to eat it up, cause the men in Black are "so great" and everyone else sucks. Yeah, the rest DO suck, but then so do the ABs. World rugby is shit at the moment, there's not a team in existence that the AB or Wallaby teams from the late 80s/early 90s wouldn't eat alive.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
