Manly pretty much par - still think they will have probs with the better teams in the end.
It doesn't take a genius to figure that one out when they've got the best player out of the team, did u forget that they're 2-7 without stewart before this game. Nice one norse
Well done on backing manly btw.
Scoreline flattered Manly. They would struggle to beat many above them.
Come on mate you're aware of their poor record without stewart to start this season and you've decided to back'em at -12 which they covered and yet u come up with this comment as a knights supporter u should know well how difficult it is for a team without their key player on the field. Didn't you also back'em against the titans at skilled two weeks ago? wouldn't u say that it was a bad call by the ref that cost them the game. We can start criticising eachother's teams but come on wtf is that all about? u prefer if they won by 6? there were plenty of good signs from the chooks, it was a good win after the slow start.
Your opinion guys but after reading this i had to respond, they had a decent game and steadily climbing off the bottom of the table. Your comments just baffles me, normally people criticise the team that they lose their bets with. OK you guys hate manly, fair enough, but u back'em for a win and get paid but no no no let's not give the roosters any credit, should of been 56-0 after coming off 98-0 in the last two. They both sit 11th and 15th on the table coming into the game, wouldn't it be fair to say it is expected for both sides to play without the greatest confidence.
That's my opinion.
0
Sorry just read these comments;
Manly pretty much par - still think they will have probs with the better teams in the end.
It doesn't take a genius to figure that one out when they've got the best player out of the team, did u forget that they're 2-7 without stewart before this game. Nice one norse
Well done on backing manly btw.
Scoreline flattered Manly. They would struggle to beat many above them.
Come on mate you're aware of their poor record without stewart to start this season and you've decided to back'em at -12 which they covered and yet u come up with this comment as a knights supporter u should know well how difficult it is for a team without their key player on the field. Didn't you also back'em against the titans at skilled two weeks ago? wouldn't u say that it was a bad call by the ref that cost them the game. We can start criticising eachother's teams but come on wtf is that all about? u prefer if they won by 6? there were plenty of good signs from the chooks, it was a good win after the slow start.
Your opinion guys but after reading this i had to respond, they had a decent game and steadily climbing off the bottom of the table. Your comments just baffles me, normally people criticise the team that they lose their bets with. OK you guys hate manly, fair enough, but u back'em for a win and get paid but no no no let's not give the roosters any credit, should of been 56-0 after coming off 98-0 in the last two. They both sit 11th and 15th on the table coming into the game, wouldn't it be fair to say it is expected for both sides to play without the greatest confidence.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.