All Forums | Rugby

Friday night corruption and luck - In Game

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4636
Posts: 110
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #51
Are Cronulla on the over?
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #52
What were the broncos doing there? Pick uo the ball
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #53
If i lost that game, i dont know what i would have done
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 30979
Posted: #54
Wade Graham
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #55

Under

When you really really think about it...The sharks scored 5 tries and 4 of them were damn lucky

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 102561
Posted: #56
I would be filthy if I had the over. What type of kick was that from Chad Townsend at the end? He kicked it like he was half drunk
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 102561
Posted: #57
But I wouldn't know since I had the under
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #58

Quote Originally Posted by rod_steel:

I would be filthy if I had the over. What type of kick was that from Chad Townsend at the end? He kicked it like he was half drunk

Yeah but Rod there were alot of lucky tries scored in that game..

Really, only 2 legitimate tries scored that game

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 102561
Posted: #59
LUCK factor got me the win there
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 102561
Posted: #60
Poms looking good early
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #61

Bryce Gibbs just said about the Broncos

"They were favourites"....

How does he know?

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 771
Posted: #62
Because he's not retarded?...
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #63

Quote Originally Posted by UnderandOver:

Because he's not retarded?...

Because maybe he bet on his team...Tandy did, we know that

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2002
Posts: 16902
Posted: #64
That whole game was retarded...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 123
Posted: #65
Tandy was a stupid dogs player maybe that's why. How would a player like Gibbs not know they weren't favs without Gallen and Carney??
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 123
Posted: #66
And there is that thing called a LADDER which shows where teams are ranked plus sharks were away from home. Yes he is a footballer and a forward but 2 + 2 is not that hard. Easy to assume football players are degenerates Rostos?
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #67

Quote Originally Posted by dashforash:

Tandy was a stupid dogs player maybe that's why. How would a player like Gibbs not know they weren't favs without Gallen and Carney??

Yeah , real easy to figure out they were favs , considering they were MISSING

Hodges, Thaiday, Parker, Petro, Teo, Gillette and Hannant...

Yeah, a team missing 7 rep players and it is very very easy to see them as favourites....

Good one

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #68

Quote Originally Posted by dashforash:

And there is that thing called a LADDER which shows where teams are ranked plus sharks were away from home. Yes he is a footballer and a forward but 2 + 2 is not that hard. Easy to assume football players are degenerates Rostos?

Yeah, because every matchup where one team is above the other on the ladder ALWAYS results in the higher team being favourites...

Does someone read these fairytale stories to you at night that the NRL is squeeky clean to help you go to sleep at night?

Are you scared of the dark and need someone to read these stories to you to make you feel comfortable...

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 30979
Posted: #69
Steve Smith
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 15753
Posted: #70

Quote Originally Posted by Ace77:

Steve Smith

ACE

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 102561
Posted: #71
Poms 5-0
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 123
Posted: #72
Yes broncos had players missing but player for player broncos still had more quality then the sharks hence it wasn't too hard to figure out who the fav would be. I never said NRL or any other sports was clean I'm sick of hearing crap from you about match fixing, what the refs are betting etc etc get the F**K over it and talk about how great the game was. If every bet turns out the way opposite to how you want stop betting league
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 15753
Posted: #73

Quote Originally Posted by dashforash:

Yes broncos had players missing but player for player broncos still had more quality then the sharks hence it wasn't too hard to figure out who the fav would be. I never said NRL or any other sports was clean I'm sick of hearing crap from you about match fixing, what the refs are betting etc etc get the F**K over it and talk about how great the game was. If every bet turns out the way opposite to how you want stop betting league

Newbe sticking it to you ROSTOS.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #74

Quote Originally Posted by dashforash:

Yes broncos had players missing but player for player broncos still had more quality then the sharks hence it wasn't too hard to figure out who the fav would be. I never said NRL or any other sports was clean I'm sick of hearing crap from you about match fixing, what the refs are betting etc etc get the F**K over it and talk about how great the game was. If every bet turns out the way opposite to how you want stop betting league

GTFO

Sharks pack last night on paper was far far superior to the Broncos last night, in size and in experience...

The broncos had the slight edge in the halves , and the backs were aboyt even...

And for the record, i won last night, but the refs did everything in their power to get Brisbane back in it,..

 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #75

Quote Originally Posted by dashforash:

Yes broncos had players missing but player for player broncos still had more quality then the sharks hence it wasn't too hard to figure out who the fav would be. I never said NRL or any other sports was clean I'm sick of hearing crap from you about match fixing, what the refs are betting etc etc get the F**K over it and talk about how great the game was. If every bet turns out the way opposite to how you want stop betting league

If you dont like it, then FUCK OFF.......No one is forcing to read anything., You dont like, GTFO.....

All Forums | Rugby
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.