Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
Lets see......
Storm player runs a decoy hit the opposing defender, impedes him, impacting the defender close to the try line...."Video ref "lets see, i have the storm to cover, i know it should be a try, but when i saw the odds flashed every 5 minutes when i was watching the footy show, it was too tempting to resist, try".
Perret gets the ball, you cannot confirm if it was a try or not, there is benefit of the doubt , Video ref "well, if i award this, the Roosters could get a leg up, i cant let that happen, i may lose my bet. Yeah, lets not award this, this will really deflate the Roosters".No try........
Players bet on games, refs bet on games, players friends, refs and families bet on games........END OF STORY
OK, so it's 16-4, or 16-6 with a very good conversion, going into the sheds at the Half.
Roosters would win it then?
OK, take away that Storm try on the possible obstruction.
So that would have swung the game around?
If it is fixed, it's gonna be fixed on a close match with two teams who are competitive. Not on a match that is going to be a blowout from the very beginning and everyone knows it. What's there to bloody fix?
The refs could have given the Roosters 8 tackles all night long and the Storm would have still won.
But let's forget about that......what have you seen in the past rounds that would make you think the Roosters were the play? What have you seen that would make you think the Storm would shit the bed?
Seeing the books open with the hook on the 12 rang bells that they were baiting for Chook money.
C'mon Rostos, there is shady shi tin this league, but tonight wasn't one of them. Dodgy calls or not, the Roosters were not competitive enough tonight to stay within the number.