One in the AFL today, may add one in the game in Perth depending on a couple of things
Hawks -8.5 over Kangaroos
Rod, why do you like the Hawks here? Don't you think the Roos will bother them all night in the midfield?
I was thinking about Roos ML or Hawks by 20+. I don't think the line will make a difference.
Was thinking Roos ML, but also was looking for a reason to fade myself as I've been on a horrible run. Your post might do the trick. Can you add some more into was your favor the premiers tonight? Thanks!
0
Quote Originally Posted by rod_steel:
One in the AFL today, may add one in the game in Perth depending on a couple of things
Hawks -8.5 over Kangaroos
Rod, why do you like the Hawks here? Don't you think the Roos will bother them all night in the midfield?
I was thinking about Roos ML or Hawks by 20+. I don't think the line will make a difference.
Was thinking Roos ML, but also was looking for a reason to fade myself as I've been on a horrible run. Your post might do the trick. Can you add some more into was your favor the premiers tonight? Thanks!
Certainly agree that he is good but ahead of guys like Stewart and Slater? That is exactly what this Manly team have missed, Stewart popping up when there is a half break made. There hasn't been anyone from Manly who is able to do that, turn a half break into a try.
It is debatable, but I feel Stewart has the advantage of some great backrowers (watmough, G Stewart) and even front rowers in Kite and Perry who run hard and straight and often find themselves in holes allowing for a player like B Stewart to capitalise. Saying that he is an amazing support player and Slater is another story.....
0
Quote Originally Posted by rod_steel:
Certainly agree that he is good but ahead of guys like Stewart and Slater? That is exactly what this Manly team have missed, Stewart popping up when there is a half break made. There hasn't been anyone from Manly who is able to do that, turn a half break into a try.
It is debatable, but I feel Stewart has the advantage of some great backrowers (watmough, G Stewart) and even front rowers in Kite and Perry who run hard and straight and often find themselves in holes allowing for a player like B Stewart to capitalise. Saying that he is an amazing support player and Slater is another story.....
It is debatable, but I feel Stewart has the advantage of some great backrowers (watmough, G Stewart) and even front rowers in Kite and Perry who run hard and straight and often find themselves in holes allowing for a player like B Stewart to capitalise. Saying that he is an amazing support player and Slater is another story.....
You make a good point about the backrowers available for Manly actually, never really thought about that until watching the game today. Watmough's ability to bust the tackle really does set it up for Stewart to make the full break. Both in tandem were outstanding today and should be in the NSW SOO team IMO.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sambrown87:
It is debatable, but I feel Stewart has the advantage of some great backrowers (watmough, G Stewart) and even front rowers in Kite and Perry who run hard and straight and often find themselves in holes allowing for a player like B Stewart to capitalise. Saying that he is an amazing support player and Slater is another story.....
You make a good point about the backrowers available for Manly actually, never really thought about that until watching the game today. Watmough's ability to bust the tackle really does set it up for Stewart to make the full break. Both in tandem were outstanding today and should be in the NSW SOO team IMO.
Well in on Leinster. Cracking defense by the Dubliners for the full 80.
Funny how this match ended up falling on the 1--just figured 'Quins would've gotten the result.
Cheers
Been a bit disappointed with the quality of the quarter-finals in both the Blues/Toulouse and Quins/Leinster games. But at the same time could appreciate the defenses of both games.
Munster were awesome today. Should be odds on to win the whole thing now, only thing preventing that is a semi final game against Leinster at Croke Park.
0
Quote Originally Posted by claycourtlesson:
Well in on Leinster. Cracking defense by the Dubliners for the full 80.
Funny how this match ended up falling on the 1--just figured 'Quins would've gotten the result.
Cheers
Been a bit disappointed with the quality of the quarter-finals in both the Blues/Toulouse and Quins/Leinster games. But at the same time could appreciate the defenses of both games.
Munster were awesome today. Should be odds on to win the whole thing now, only thing preventing that is a semi final game against Leinster at Croke Park.
Me neither - been on a bit of a good roll in baseball which is a bit of surprise this time of year. I just kept it simple and tacked on +12.5 (1.29) BUL with an NBA game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rod_steel:
Not interested in the NRL MNF game.
Me neither - been on a bit of a good roll in baseball which is a bit of surprise this time of year. I just kept it simple and tacked on +12.5 (1.29) BUL with an NBA game.
Me neither - been on a bit of a good roll in baseball which is a bit of surprise this time of year. I just kept it simple and tacked on +12.5 (1.29) BUL with an NBA game.
There is quite a bit of rain about near the stadium so think that should be safe, can't see it being a blowout either way tonight.
0
Quote Originally Posted by norseman67:
Me neither - been on a bit of a good roll in baseball which is a bit of surprise this time of year. I just kept it simple and tacked on +12.5 (1.29) BUL with an NBA game.
There is quite a bit of rain about near the stadium so think that should be safe, can't see it being a blowout either way tonight.
I know, Rod, Munster looked impressive. Like you've said all along------that outfit is/has been built for Heineken Cup exclusively. They couldn't care less about Magner's League-----they only bring out the heavy artillery for HC.
Leicester'll give them a run, though.
BTW, where is the final this year?
0
I know, Rod, Munster looked impressive. Like you've said all along------that outfit is/has been built for Heineken Cup exclusively. They couldn't care less about Magner's League-----they only bring out the heavy artillery for HC.
I know, Rod, Munster looked impressive. Like you've said all along------that outfit is/has been built for Heineken Cup exclusively. They couldn't care less about Magner's League-----they only bring out the heavy artillery for HC.
Leicester'll give them a run, though.
BTW, where is the final this year?
Final is played at Murrayfield this year
0
Quote Originally Posted by claycourtlesson:
I know, Rod, Munster looked impressive. Like you've said all along------that outfit is/has been built for Heineken Cup exclusively. They couldn't care less about Magner's League-----they only bring out the heavy artillery for HC.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.