All Forums | Rugby

The Lance Armstrong case PROVES

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1861
Posts: 47
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 944
Posted: #26
I dont get the chance to watch night time TV..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 2542
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by Luckylunchbox:

I liked full frontal better than fast forward 


both before my time, but this country does not do sketch comedy very well
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 5945
Posted: #28
Quote Originally Posted by Hirschfelder:



both before my time, but this country does not do sketch comedy very well

Id like to say they were both before my time but unfortunately only fast forward was (f*ck is 28 old)
Australian TV is unbearable and they wonder why we all love the punt and the drink so much
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 7556
Posted: #29
There were some talented comedians in that original fast forward crew, they just haven't produced a great deal of work ever since.. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 5945
Posted: #30
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1u7uhE-OMM

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 944
Posted: #31
I grew up with Hoges and Strop and Delvine Delaney
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 6903
Posted: #32
rostos -- i was doing some research for school on different tests used for steroid testing...

basically what it comes down to is the scientists analytical skills to test the said urine sample. 

athletes in those days were able to eat or drink certain substances that would cause the results to be skewed.

as the scientists developed better methods of testing, the athletes would still think their previous methods would work -- the more efficient testing would find more positives.

the journal article i read mentioned lance armstrong, on how there was massive suspicion of him using...but he was never caught.

but

everyone in cycling uses, so what difference does it make?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 7556
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by CoverLane:

rostos -- i was doing some research for school on different tests used for steroid testing...

basically what it comes down to is the scientists analytical skills to test the said urine sample. 

athletes in those days were able to eat or drink certain substances that would cause the results to be skewed.

as the scientists developed better methods of testing, the athletes would still think their previous methods would work -- the more efficient testing would find more positives.

the journal article i read mentioned lance armstrong, on how there was massive suspicion of him using...but he was never caught.

but

everyone in cycling uses, so what difference does it make?

Easy on the rational stuff, or snake will tell you to fuck off .. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 5945
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by CoverLane:

rostos -- i was doing some research for school on different tests used for steroid testing...

basically what it comes down to is the scientists analytical skills to test the said urine sample. 

athletes in those days were able to eat or drink certain substances that would cause the results to be skewed.

as the scientists developed better methods of testing, the athletes would still think their previous methods would work -- the more efficient testing would find more positives.

the journal article i read mentioned lance armstrong, on how there was massive suspicion of him using...but he was never caught.

but

everyone in cycling uses, so what difference does it make?

I'm with you, The teammates pointing fingers were also doing it but Lance is the scumbag cheat

I really don't care about PED's id love the tigers to have 5 Rodney Howe's
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by CoverLane:

rostos -- i was doing some research for school on different tests used for steroid testing...

basically what it comes down to is the scientists analytical skills to test the said urine sample. 

athletes in those days were able to eat or drink certain substances that would cause the results to be skewed.

as the scientists developed better methods of testing, the athletes would still think their previous methods would work -- the more efficient testing would find more positives.

the journal article i read mentioned lance armstrong, on how there was massive suspicion of him using...but he was never caught.

but

everyone in cycling uses, so what difference does it make?

CL, i am merely looking at the cover ups by officials, the lies, the ability to cheat without getting caught etc etc.

My OP was designed to show that corruption is rife in sports, where money is involved, greed, lust and power are behind it.

 

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 30979
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by Luckylunchbox:


Id like to say they were both before my time but unfortunately only fast forward was (f*ck is 28 old)
Australian TV is unbearable and they wonder why we all love the punt and the drink so much








Rekindled Plod



 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 2542
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:

CL, i am merely looking at the cover ups by officials, the lies, the ability to cheat without getting caught etc etc.

My OP was designed to show that corruption is rife in sports, where money is involved, greed, lust and power are behind it.

 

 



you forgot unbridled enthusiasm
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 30979
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by Oil-Beef-Hooked:


baahaahhahahhaa fukn shittn meself 


oh lordy, you are one funny fukka...

do unibet do unibet... nah nah thats too easy

this ad was thrashed during caulfeild guineas.. can picture all those happy TW punters getting their hundy back






True,unitbet is the new Tom Waterhouse

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 5945
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by Ace77:





True,unitbet is the new Tom Waterhouse


Id rather be looking at Tom than Samual L Jackson and those high school quality BET365 adds
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 30979
Posted: #40
Im sick of these motherfuckin limits on my my motherfuckin bets
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 7556
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by Ace77:

Im sick of these motherfuckin limits on my my motherfuckin bets

"Yes Bet 365 deserve to die and I hope they burn in hell !"

"and I will strike down with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to limit my bets !"

"Ak 47, the best there is... when you absolutely positively got to kill every Bet 365 motherfucker in the room, accept no substitutes..."
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #42

Quote Originally Posted by Hirschfelder:



you forgot unbridled enthusiasm

Hey Hirschfelder, the Oz lotto jackpots to $100 mill....No winners in 3-4 weeks....I suppose there arent any good cappers in Australia...

after all, lotto is all skill as luck doesnt exist........

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 2542
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:

Hey Hirschfelder, the Oz lotto jackpots to $100 mill....No winners in 3-4 weeks....I suppose there arent any good cappers in Australia...

after all, lotto is all skill as luck doesnt exist........



probability actually

but an expert in gambling like yourself knew this
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #44

Quote Originally Posted by Hirschfelder:



probability actually

but an expert in gambling like yourself knew this

Yeah, 1 in 45 million chance...

Yep, to win this, you need skill, no such thing as luck......

I suppose the people that dont win the lotto are just "jelous failures"...the people that win it, "know how to cap".......

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 30979
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by Jive_Turkey:


"Yes Bet 365 deserve to die and I hope they burn in hell !"

"and I will strike down with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to limit my bets !"

"Ak 47, the best there is... when you absolutely positively got to kill every Bet 365 motherfucker in the room, accept no substitutes..."



 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 30979
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:

Yeah, 1 in 45 million chance...

Yep, to win this, you need skill, no such thing as luck......

I suppose the people that dont win the lotto are just "jelous failures"...the people that win it, "know how to cap".......



Rostos,is Niwot the best stayer you have seen?
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 30979
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by Hirschfelder:



probability actually

but an expert in gambling like yourself knew this


 Paul Henri Mathieu
All Forums | Rugby
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.