you sir must of been one of the individuals who took the dutch -550
you sir must of been one of the individuals who took the dutch -550
Good! You should give up! Had you followed the public you would have lost coins on the Dutch like we did! Unless I am missing something, you my friend, are manipulating your facts! The fact that the line was strange and the public still hammered the Dutch means that we all played the square play but with what happened with the Russians yesterday (same strange line) and many passed on it b/c it seemed fishy, how could one pass up that line?
Good! You should give up! Had you followed the public you would have lost coins on the Dutch like we did! Unless I am missing something, you my friend, are manipulating your facts! The fact that the line was strange and the public still hammered the Dutch means that we all played the square play but with what happened with the Russians yesterday (same strange line) and many passed on it b/c it seemed fishy, how could one pass up that line?
All you people that are making fun of him are the ones that have no idea what they are talking about. He has explained this betting option pretty well(I have it also). The high line on the Dutch -550 was because the only way you lose the bet is if Denmark won. Noone expected Denmark to win, as everyone assumed Dutch win or worst case a draw. If it was a draw the Dutch bettors would get their money back. The high juice is paying for protection in case of a draw because in normal bets a draw would be a loss for Dutch bettors. The problem here was that Denmark shockingly won and anyone who risked the extra juice got burned pretty badly
All you people that are making fun of him are the ones that have no idea what they are talking about. He has explained this betting option pretty well(I have it also). The high line on the Dutch -550 was because the only way you lose the bet is if Denmark won. Noone expected Denmark to win, as everyone assumed Dutch win or worst case a draw. If it was a draw the Dutch bettors would get their money back. The high juice is paying for protection in case of a draw because in normal bets a draw would be a loss for Dutch bettors. The problem here was that Denmark shockingly won and anyone who risked the extra juice got burned pretty badly
All you people that are making fun of him are the ones that have no idea what they are talking about. He has explained this betting option pretty well(I have it also). The high line on the Dutch -550 was because the only way you lose the bet is if Denmark won. Noone expected Denmark to win, as everyone assumed Dutch win or worst case a draw. If it was a draw the Dutch bettors would get their money back. The high juice is paying for protection in case of a draw because in normal bets a draw would be a loss for Dutch bettors. The problem here was that Denmark shockingly won and anyone who risked the extra juice got burned pretty badly
I never realized so many degenerates on here who bet soccer has no clue to what a no draw no bet option is, and because of that was the reason for all the negative feedback. these clowns thought I was actually implying that the public was on denmark and totally regarded the key words in title thread "no draw no bet" because they were to clueless to what know that actually was and explaining it just unfortunately made everything even worse but thanks for reinterating to the idiots who couldnt catch on the 1st time
All you people that are making fun of him are the ones that have no idea what they are talking about. He has explained this betting option pretty well(I have it also). The high line on the Dutch -550 was because the only way you lose the bet is if Denmark won. Noone expected Denmark to win, as everyone assumed Dutch win or worst case a draw. If it was a draw the Dutch bettors would get their money back. The high juice is paying for protection in case of a draw because in normal bets a draw would be a loss for Dutch bettors. The problem here was that Denmark shockingly won and anyone who risked the extra juice got burned pretty badly
I never realized so many degenerates on here who bet soccer has no clue to what a no draw no bet option is, and because of that was the reason for all the negative feedback. these clowns thought I was actually implying that the public was on denmark and totally regarded the key words in title thread "no draw no bet" because they were to clueless to what know that actually was and explaining it just unfortunately made everything even worse but thanks for reinterating to the idiots who couldnt catch on the 1st time
5dimes is great book for those soccer betting options but some books like "sportsbook.ag" dont offer soccer spreads and only ML, the no draw no bet option and alternate lines its sucks they set it up like but sportsbook.ag sometimes offer better value than that at 5dimes and vice versa is why i use both
5dimes is great book for those soccer betting options but some books like "sportsbook.ag" dont offer soccer spreads and only ML, the no draw no bet option and alternate lines its sucks they set it up like but sportsbook.ag sometimes offer better value than that at 5dimes and vice versa is why i use both
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.