All Forums | Streak Survivor

Are you above .500 in Survivor picks?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 181721
Posts: 620
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 1096
Posted: #1
Just curious.  Right now, my secondary goal right now is to get my pick percentage back above .500 for survivor.

Sadly, if survivor picks represent the best you can come up with, you really should be above .500.
But for me, when I'm back to 0, I'll occasionally make a pick without really researching it.  Probably why my percentage isn't so great.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 22557
Posted: #2
yes i am.....research is why too....good post Snuke.....
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 20
Posted: #3
No doubt, research, research and when you are done, research. Most of the time, a nice matchup, sometimes I get sucked in with gut feeling instead of my research. 
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 1096
Posted: #4
Quote Originally Posted by billyloco:

yes i am.....research is why too....good post Snuke.....



 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 7139
Posted: #5
yeah when im at a streak of zero or even one or two i rarely do any research. I know it doesnt make sense but most of the time im strapped for time so i just make an educated guess. Whats the worst that could happen?? I stay at zero?? lol
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 1096
Posted: #6
Quote Originally Posted by Chevyguy24:

yeah when im at a streak of zero or even one or two i rarely do any research. I know it doesnt make sense but most of the time im strapped for time so i just make an educated guess. Whats the worst that could happen?? I stay at zero?? lol


Agreed.  Its not that horrible when you have no time.  I sometimes don't really research until I get a 3 game win streak going.  I let chance get me there, and then start taking it serious.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 179
Posted: #7
I wait to get to 5 before I start taking it seriously, thats probably why I'm 1 game under .500
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 961
Posted: #8
I have to be the worst Survivor player ever,over 900 games picked and my longest streak is 6 which i have right now.
Saying that it will probably end tonight!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 1096
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by PSU12:

I have to be the worst Survivor player ever,over 900 games picked and my longest streak is 6 which i have right now.
Saying that it will probably end tonight!


Think positive!  Go Blackhawks!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2001
Posts: 187
Posted: #10
To say you should be above .500 on survivor or you aren't doing very well isn't all that accurate because you have to remember in some sports all games aren't available to choose...a.k.a. baseball. Here is a fun stat boys...as of right now I am 755-751-25....have been around 20 games over and 20 games under .500 over the years....but look where it is after 1531 picks...interesting huh?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 1854
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by CorporalJoker:

I wait to get to 5 before I start taking it seriously, thats probably why I'm 1 game under .500

i think alot of us have that same mentality.     

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 2532
Posted: #12
If you can ride a streak for 5 or more wins, then you should start studying. Until then, it's like throwing shit at the wall. Only some of it will stick....
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 1096
Posted: #13
Ya know, since posting this I went on a great run (9-2) and am now one win below .500.  All because I started taking it a bit more seriously.....
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1
Posted: #14
iys a good goal but i think you should be over .600 to make you a real winner
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 1096
Posted: #15
Well, I just hit .500.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 3
Posted: #16
im 7 games above 500, and rarely do research in fact when i do i loose, i just pick my spots
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 2030
Posted: #17
Record: 131-90-7, thats my record but my best streak is only 8.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 253
Posted: #18
im 8-2 i know it all
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 26
Posted: #19
I quit being lazy about ANY pick!!  I had got to 10 wins, and I carelessly put in a bad pick  I'm at 4, but lok for me to get to the 25 wins!!!   In this eceonomy, I need the $$$$$$$$
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2000
Posts: 13124
Posted: #20
I'm over .500 but I don't think you should be judged by your record. Many times I'll just guess or sometimes I forget until the last game to make a pick and have to force something. Sometimes when I'm feeling unlucky I'll even post the opposite of what I like so I don't jinx my real life wagers.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 142
Posted: #21
I am 21 games over 500.   My longest streak was 9.  I had it to 6 last week but now I am back at 1 after tonight
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1123
Posted: #22
Recently started picking on Survivor.
Best streak is only 4, but am 22-12 overall (63%)
 
I do quite a bit of research on every pick and find that I get MORE nervous about making this single FREE pick than I do laying my hard earned money on the line for actual wagers!  Heck if I did this much work on my actual wagers..........  
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1941
Posted: #23
I am 22-30 and before winning 4 out of 5, I lost 6 in a row, lots of bad luck. I am probably going to take under 213 with Houston vs Sacramento I can't see that going over. I am on a 2 game streak (would be 4 if I had not taken Canisius) and have not won more then 3 in a row, extremely pitiful.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 124
Posted: #24
I won a hat once with 9 games, and was 20 games over once.  But, I now I think I'm getting closer to .500.  You have to do research.  After the 9 game streak, I cannot get anything going!
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 7139
Posted: #25
Being over .500 doesnt mean anything in survivor. It's all about the streaks. Im 478-501-17, 23 games under yet ive won two hats with a 9 gamer and my 10 game longest streak. It's funny though because i also have a 12 game losing streak
All Forums | Streak Survivor
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.