Do bookie's lose money?
This is all hypothetical of course..
A person loses a lot of money to online sports books and this person's local guy. He then decides to take action from close friends and some others. In four weeks he gets cleaned out for 4k. Usually a bad weekend would be -500. He's doing everything "correctly" (i.e. charging 10 cents on the dollar, taking straight wagers only, game and halftime lines, etc.)
What would you do?
A. Stop
B. Continue
C. Other
PS - 50% are known degen's. The other 50% never wagered on a game in their entire life.
This is all hypothetical of course..
A person loses a lot of money to online sports books and this person's local guy. He then decides to take action from close friends and some others. In four weeks he gets cleaned out for 4k. Usually a bad weekend would be -500. He's doing everything "correctly" (i.e. charging 10 cents on the dollar, taking straight wagers only, game and halftime lines, etc.)
What would you do?
A. Stop
B. Continue
C. Other
PS - 50% are known degen's. The other 50% never wagered on a game in their entire life.
Bookies have been losing consistently over the last year. It is a set up by Vegas to stimulate the economy! It is the truth, trust me, I know! I have lost $25K over the last year booking five players total. It is non-stop. Vegas is trying to get players to advertise their winnings and sports books are getting more players signed up. It is working, now is the best time ever to be a player in the history of sports wagering. Guaranteed! Watch the comments that roll in after this post. The bookies will second the notion. To gambler66, be glad you quit while you were ahead.
i know last year was a nightmare, favorites, 1h and game and the over hit 90% on big games, if not game and over at least. Players made huge money last year.
Bookies have been losing consistently over the last year. It is a set up by Vegas to stimulate the economy! It is the truth, trust me, I know! I have lost $25K over the last year booking five players total. It is non-stop. Vegas is trying to get players to advertise their winnings and sports books are getting more players signed up. It is working, now is the best time ever to be a player in the history of sports wagering. Guaranteed! Watch the comments that roll in after this post. The bookies will second the notion. To gambler66, be glad you quit while you were ahead.
i know last year was a nightmare, favorites, 1h and game and the over hit 90% on big games, if not game and over at least. Players made huge money last year.
Then I got cleaned out as a bookie. I was like an ATM that he kept taking money from. The only reason I am still alive is because of his stupid bets.
Then I got cleaned out as a bookie. I was like an ATM that he kept taking money from. The only reason I am still alive is because of his stupid bets.
Patience and discipline are the two most important things you need to have in order to find the edge and succeed in sports betting. Yes, these two are more important than money management itself because, without patience and discipline you wouldn't be able to successfully employ an efficient money management plan. In sports betting, having patience and discipline is a special ability--if you cannot master this special ability you will never find the edge. It may seem easy but mastering this ability is very difficult, it is as hard as climbing a slippery and almost vertical hill; you can lose control and slip anytime. For most bettors it is virtually impossible to maintain patience and discipline in the long run. They might do everything perfectly for 1 week, 1 month or even a year but eventually they will momentarily lose that special ability and that moment is enough to destroy the bankroll.
Most bettors begin with a short bankroll, perhaps a few hundred dollars. Often bettors who load their sportsbook with short bankroll find it impossible to maintain patience and discipline in a consistent basis because they will get bored of using proper money management on such small amount. As a result they will lose their bankroll frequently and re-load numerous times to accumulate losses. These bettors turn few hundred dollar losses into few thousand dollars in a matter of few weeks while dreaming of turning few hundred dollars into few thousand dollars of profit! Without patience and discipline your dream will never come true. If you fall into this category of bettors, we highly recommend that you wait patiently and collect these deposits without any action till you get a reasonable ($1000 minimum) bankroll.
Patience and discipline are the two most important things you need to have in order to find the edge and succeed in sports betting. Yes, these two are more important than money management itself because, without patience and discipline you wouldn't be able to successfully employ an efficient money management plan. In sports betting, having patience and discipline is a special ability--if you cannot master this special ability you will never find the edge. It may seem easy but mastering this ability is very difficult, it is as hard as climbing a slippery and almost vertical hill; you can lose control and slip anytime. For most bettors it is virtually impossible to maintain patience and discipline in the long run. They might do everything perfectly for 1 week, 1 month or even a year but eventually they will momentarily lose that special ability and that moment is enough to destroy the bankroll.
Most bettors begin with a short bankroll, perhaps a few hundred dollars. Often bettors who load their sportsbook with short bankroll find it impossible to maintain patience and discipline in a consistent basis because they will get bored of using proper money management on such small amount. As a result they will lose their bankroll frequently and re-load numerous times to accumulate losses. These bettors turn few hundred dollar losses into few thousand dollars in a matter of few weeks while dreaming of turning few hundred dollars into few thousand dollars of profit! Without patience and discipline your dream will never come true. If you fall into this category of bettors, we highly recommend that you wait patiently and collect these deposits without any action till you get a reasonable ($1000 minimum) bankroll.
completely wrong. "knew a guy who ran a book for 3 years" lol never wanted to just win 10 percent. The action is never even and thats a good thing. You will always come out ahead in the long run. Last couple weeks have been bad. A lot of public plays hitting like crazy. Vegas knows what they are doing just watch they will go on some bad runs.
No dude, you're completely wrong and Chadnailz6 is right. I know, I've been working in the gaming industry in Nevada for the last 26 years and counting. When the book puts out their lines, either money lines or point spread, they don't put up a number that they think the outcome will be,but they put up numbers that they think the public will bet both sides of, and then they make their money off of the vigorish on the losing bets. Casinos don't like to gamble. Las Vegas wasn't built by giving away money.
WHERE THE BOOKS MAKE THE REAL $$$
The book makes the majority of their income off of football parlay cards. On these bets, the book holds AT LEAST 37.5% advantage over the player, or more. And the reason being is because of the odds the card pays out.
EXAMPLE: Suppose you bet a 5-team parlay. The odds the book pays out on a 5-team parlay is 20 to 1. However, the odds of hitting a 5-team parlay is 32 to 1. The 32 to 1 is figured by adding up every possible betting combinations of the 5 teams, 32 different combinations. Now, as Chadnailz6 pointed out, since the book has so much action, every possible combination of that ticket will be played, and out of those 32 tickets, only 1 ticket will win. So the book returns the 1 unit bet to the winner, PLUS 20 additional units for winning. Now, out of the 32 tickets for that particular 5-team parlay, the book is down 21 units, 1 unit for the winning bet, and 20 units for the winning payoff. Now that leaves the book with 11 units left over. That's called PROFIT. In gaming, it doesn't matter how much money is spent, everything is calculated by the unit. Regardless if someone's betting $1 or $100,000, the book's PC (percentage) will always remain the same. So if the book holds at least 37.5% advantage over the bettor, that means for every hundred dollars the book takes in, they are GUARENTEED to make $37.50. The odds get worse for the bettor with more teams bet.
It's not a big industry secret or anything like that, it just comes down to simple odds. That's the truth. I know a lot of people won't believe me, but that's the way it is. And for those people who don't believe what I say, well, let's just say, Las Vegas loves you.
completely wrong. "knew a guy who ran a book for 3 years" lol never wanted to just win 10 percent. The action is never even and thats a good thing. You will always come out ahead in the long run. Last couple weeks have been bad. A lot of public plays hitting like crazy. Vegas knows what they are doing just watch they will go on some bad runs.
No dude, you're completely wrong and Chadnailz6 is right. I know, I've been working in the gaming industry in Nevada for the last 26 years and counting. When the book puts out their lines, either money lines or point spread, they don't put up a number that they think the outcome will be,but they put up numbers that they think the public will bet both sides of, and then they make their money off of the vigorish on the losing bets. Casinos don't like to gamble. Las Vegas wasn't built by giving away money.
WHERE THE BOOKS MAKE THE REAL $$$
The book makes the majority of their income off of football parlay cards. On these bets, the book holds AT LEAST 37.5% advantage over the player, or more. And the reason being is because of the odds the card pays out.
EXAMPLE: Suppose you bet a 5-team parlay. The odds the book pays out on a 5-team parlay is 20 to 1. However, the odds of hitting a 5-team parlay is 32 to 1. The 32 to 1 is figured by adding up every possible betting combinations of the 5 teams, 32 different combinations. Now, as Chadnailz6 pointed out, since the book has so much action, every possible combination of that ticket will be played, and out of those 32 tickets, only 1 ticket will win. So the book returns the 1 unit bet to the winner, PLUS 20 additional units for winning. Now, out of the 32 tickets for that particular 5-team parlay, the book is down 21 units, 1 unit for the winning bet, and 20 units for the winning payoff. Now that leaves the book with 11 units left over. That's called PROFIT. In gaming, it doesn't matter how much money is spent, everything is calculated by the unit. Regardless if someone's betting $1 or $100,000, the book's PC (percentage) will always remain the same. So if the book holds at least 37.5% advantage over the bettor, that means for every hundred dollars the book takes in, they are GUARENTEED to make $37.50. The odds get worse for the bettor with more teams bet.
It's not a big industry secret or anything like that, it just comes down to simple odds. That's the truth. I know a lot of people won't believe me, but that's the way it is. And for those people who don't believe what I say, well, let's just say, Las Vegas loves you.
That's right. They're basically telling you "Bet on 5 games and the juice will be a 'wholesale' -104 instead of -110" !
Now if I'm a book and I got $1000 action on Team A and $1500 action on Team B.
If Team A wins, I pay out $909.09 and collect $1500 = +$590.91
If Team B wins, I pay out $1363.64 and collec $1000 = -$363.64
Assuming both sides were -110 to begin with. I am effectively risking $363.64 to win $590.91, or getting +162 on Team A to win!!!
The bigger the book edge, the smaller the stake amount, the smaller the book edge, the bigger the stake amount.
For example, if I have $100 of action on Team A and $100000 action on Team B, I obv want team A to win because a lot is at stake, even though I am getting a little over +110.
If the action is even, my edge is infinite simply because my risk is zero. A thousand dollars on both sides of the game guarantees me $91 or profit regardless of who wins.
That's right. They're basically telling you "Bet on 5 games and the juice will be a 'wholesale' -104 instead of -110" !
Now if I'm a book and I got $1000 action on Team A and $1500 action on Team B.
If Team A wins, I pay out $909.09 and collect $1500 = +$590.91
If Team B wins, I pay out $1363.64 and collec $1000 = -$363.64
Assuming both sides were -110 to begin with. I am effectively risking $363.64 to win $590.91, or getting +162 on Team A to win!!!
The bigger the book edge, the smaller the stake amount, the smaller the book edge, the bigger the stake amount.
For example, if I have $100 of action on Team A and $100000 action on Team B, I obv want team A to win because a lot is at stake, even though I am getting a little over +110.
If the action is even, my edge is infinite simply because my risk is zero. A thousand dollars on both sides of the game guarantees me $91 or profit regardless of who wins.
^^^ Of course if a book pays out 20 to 1 on a 5 team parlay they will clean up. Most books nowadays pay fair odds, ie: for a 5-team parlay, it's 24.36 to 1. And with the bonus that some books offer, that reduces the effective juice to -104 per game!
That's right. They're basically telling you "Bet on 5 games and the juice will be a 'wholesale' -104 instead of -110" !
Now if I'm a book and I got $1000 action on Team A and $1500 action on Team B.
If Team A wins, I pay out $909.09 and collect $1500 = +$590.91
If Team B wins, I pay out $1363.64 and collec $1000 = -$363.64
Assuming both sides were -110 to begin with. I am effectively risking $363.64 to win $590.91, or getting +162 on Team A to win!!!
The bigger the book edge, the smaller the stake amount, the smaller the book edge, the bigger the stake amount.
For example, if I have $100 of action on Team A and $100000 action on Team B, I obv want team A to win because a lot is at stake, even though I am getting a little over +110.
If the action is even, my edge is infinite simply because my risk is zero. A thousand dollars on both sides of the game guarantees me $91 or profit regardless of who wins.
What are the "fair odds" you talk about? And why is it 24.36 to 1 on a 5-team parlay?
^^^ Of course if a book pays out 20 to 1 on a 5 team parlay they will clean up. Most books nowadays pay fair odds, ie: for a 5-team parlay, it's 24.36 to 1. And with the bonus that some books offer, that reduces the effective juice to -104 per game!
That's right. They're basically telling you "Bet on 5 games and the juice will be a 'wholesale' -104 instead of -110" !
Now if I'm a book and I got $1000 action on Team A and $1500 action on Team B.
If Team A wins, I pay out $909.09 and collect $1500 = +$590.91
If Team B wins, I pay out $1363.64 and collec $1000 = -$363.64
Assuming both sides were -110 to begin with. I am effectively risking $363.64 to win $590.91, or getting +162 on Team A to win!!!
The bigger the book edge, the smaller the stake amount, the smaller the book edge, the bigger the stake amount.
For example, if I have $100 of action on Team A and $100000 action on Team B, I obv want team A to win because a lot is at stake, even though I am getting a little over +110.
If the action is even, my edge is infinite simply because my risk is zero. A thousand dollars on both sides of the game guarantees me $91 or profit regardless of who wins.
What are the "fair odds" you talk about? And why is it 24.36 to 1 on a 5-team parlay?
What are the "fair odds" you talk about? And why is it 24.36 to 1 on a 5-team parlay?
A parlay is an "accumulator". If you were to risk $100 on one game, won and risked the entire proceeds ($190.90) on the second game, on the second game you would win $173.54, for a total of $364.44, or a $264.64 profit (fair odds = 2.644x).
A 5-team parlay at -110 each game would be [(((1/1.1)+1)^5) - 1] times your stake. If you bought a point in one of the games, your payout would be adjusted, say ((1/1.1)+1)*((1/1.1)+1)*((1/1.2)+1)*....(etc).
Fair odds is simply odds you'd get as if you ran each game into the next all in.
Pinnacle sports offers 5c lines but not on parlays. But if your games start at different times, you may take the -105 lines and go "all in" from one game to the next to have the same result as a normal parlay. If you feel like "hedging" your last leg, simply bet a little less than all in on the last game. That way you save juice and benefit from the reduced juice
What are the "fair odds" you talk about? And why is it 24.36 to 1 on a 5-team parlay?
A parlay is an "accumulator". If you were to risk $100 on one game, won and risked the entire proceeds ($190.90) on the second game, on the second game you would win $173.54, for a total of $364.44, or a $264.64 profit (fair odds = 2.644x).
A 5-team parlay at -110 each game would be [(((1/1.1)+1)^5) - 1] times your stake. If you bought a point in one of the games, your payout would be adjusted, say ((1/1.1)+1)*((1/1.1)+1)*((1/1.2)+1)*....(etc).
Fair odds is simply odds you'd get as if you ran each game into the next all in.
Pinnacle sports offers 5c lines but not on parlays. But if your games start at different times, you may take the -105 lines and go "all in" from one game to the next to have the same result as a normal parlay. If you feel like "hedging" your last leg, simply bet a little less than all in on the last game. That way you save juice and benefit from the reduced juice
A parlay is an "accumulator". If you were to risk $100 on one game, won and risked the entire proceeds ($190.90) on the second game, on the second game you would win $173.54, for a total of $364.44, or a $264.64 profit (fair odds = 2.644x).
A 5-team parlay at -110 each game would be [(((1/1.1)+1)^5) - 1] times your stake. If you bought a point in one of the games, your payout would be adjusted, say ((1/1.1)+1)*((1/1.1)+1)*((1/1.2)+1)*....(etc).
Fair odds is simply odds you'd get as if you ran each game into the next all in.
Pinnacle sports offers 5c lines but not on parlays. But if your games start at different times, you may take the -105 lines and go "all in" from one game to the next to have the same result as a normal parlay. If you feel like "hedging" your last leg, simply bet a little less than all in on the last game. That way you save juice and benefit from the reduced juice
I understand your concept of "fair odds", which is laying 110(-110) on a bet and parlaying it 5 times at the price of -110.
Laying -110, or -120, or any amount for that matter is the juice, which pretains to something totally different than the thread I was commenting on. And that is just the odds of the outcome of a certain event based on the number of possible combinations for that event.
EXAMPLE: Two baseball teams are playing each other. Now what are the odds of ANY of those teams winning AND the total of the game goes over(or you can use 'under' too)? Well, here's EVERY possible scenario of what could happen(provided that one team eventually wins and the total is not a push)...
#1) Team A wins, goes Over
#2) Team A wins, goes Under
#3) Team B win, goes Over
#4) Team B wins, goes Under
With that said, there are four different possibilities, and only one winning pick. So you have 3 losers and 1 winner. So, your odds of picking the correct one is 1 IN 4, which equates to 3 TO 1. Those are the odds I was talking about, not in a betting standard, but just the odds of something happening, AND THEN apply it to betting strategies, especially when it comes to finding values in overlays and underlays.
A parlay is an "accumulator". If you were to risk $100 on one game, won and risked the entire proceeds ($190.90) on the second game, on the second game you would win $173.54, for a total of $364.44, or a $264.64 profit (fair odds = 2.644x).
A 5-team parlay at -110 each game would be [(((1/1.1)+1)^5) - 1] times your stake. If you bought a point in one of the games, your payout would be adjusted, say ((1/1.1)+1)*((1/1.1)+1)*((1/1.2)+1)*....(etc).
Fair odds is simply odds you'd get as if you ran each game into the next all in.
Pinnacle sports offers 5c lines but not on parlays. But if your games start at different times, you may take the -105 lines and go "all in" from one game to the next to have the same result as a normal parlay. If you feel like "hedging" your last leg, simply bet a little less than all in on the last game. That way you save juice and benefit from the reduced juice
I understand your concept of "fair odds", which is laying 110(-110) on a bet and parlaying it 5 times at the price of -110.
Laying -110, or -120, or any amount for that matter is the juice, which pretains to something totally different than the thread I was commenting on. And that is just the odds of the outcome of a certain event based on the number of possible combinations for that event.
EXAMPLE: Two baseball teams are playing each other. Now what are the odds of ANY of those teams winning AND the total of the game goes over(or you can use 'under' too)? Well, here's EVERY possible scenario of what could happen(provided that one team eventually wins and the total is not a push)...
#1) Team A wins, goes Over
#2) Team A wins, goes Under
#3) Team B win, goes Over
#4) Team B wins, goes Under
With that said, there are four different possibilities, and only one winning pick. So you have 3 losers and 1 winner. So, your odds of picking the correct one is 1 IN 4, which equates to 3 TO 1. Those are the odds I was talking about, not in a betting standard, but just the odds of something happening, AND THEN apply it to betting strategies, especially when it comes to finding values in overlays and underlays.
I came up with is a system where if you bet the same game (teams and over/under) you are GUARANTEED to win 3 out of 4 outcomes.
No. You are basically doing what I like to call an "anti-parlay". Your odds of winning are good but the risk/reward is shit.
It's like someone else making a parlay against YOU, the bookie.
Whenever a player makes a 4-team parlay against me, I am always sweating bullets because the payout is so big compared to what I can win, even tho I only need 1 out of those 4 to lose.
They usually lose but sometimes they win, wiping out several week's (or months) losses in one shot.
I came up with is a system where if you bet the same game (teams and over/under) you are GUARANTEED to win 3 out of 4 outcomes.
No. You are basically doing what I like to call an "anti-parlay". Your odds of winning are good but the risk/reward is shit.
It's like someone else making a parlay against YOU, the bookie.
Whenever a player makes a 4-team parlay against me, I am always sweating bullets because the payout is so big compared to what I can win, even tho I only need 1 out of those 4 to lose.
They usually lose but sometimes they win, wiping out several week's (or months) losses in one shot.
No. You are basically doing what I like to call an "anti-parlay". Your odds of winning are good but the risk/reward is shit.
It's like someone else making a parlay against YOU, the bookie.
Whenever a player makes a 4-team parlay against me, I am always sweating bullets because the payout is so big compared to what I can win, even tho I only need 1 out of those 4 to lose.
They usually lose but sometimes they win, wiping out several week's (or months) losses in one shot.
No. You are basically doing what I like to call an "anti-parlay". Your odds of winning are good but the risk/reward is shit.
It's like someone else making a parlay against YOU, the bookie.
Whenever a player makes a 4-team parlay against me, I am always sweating bullets because the payout is so big compared to what I can win, even tho I only need 1 out of those 4 to lose.
They usually lose but sometimes they win, wiping out several week's (or months) losses in one shot.
I also do not personally know a single fucking bettor who is not killing the books. Long term or short term.
One of my earliest posts were about this subject, how back in my college days when I used to book small time action, not only did the kids laying action against me kept winning, they kept on winning BIG and PROGRESSIVELY. Turning a $50 deposit into a coupld of G's, then betting $500 a game and not missing until the SuperBowl, hitting and running.
My current guy who just took me out in the NBA playoffs for more money than I had lost on ANY of my losing years from 1998 to 2010 (had 2 winning years but they were big). And now he just slammed me hard hitting a 4-teamer and 2-teamer baseball parlay, cashed out every last penny and "taking a break".
I also do not personally know a single fucking bettor who is not killing the books. Long term or short term.
One of my earliest posts were about this subject, how back in my college days when I used to book small time action, not only did the kids laying action against me kept winning, they kept on winning BIG and PROGRESSIVELY. Turning a $50 deposit into a coupld of G's, then betting $500 a game and not missing until the SuperBowl, hitting and running.
My current guy who just took me out in the NBA playoffs for more money than I had lost on ANY of my losing years from 1998 to 2010 (had 2 winning years but they were big). And now he just slammed me hard hitting a 4-teamer and 2-teamer baseball parlay, cashed out every last penny and "taking a break".
I had the Over 9 in the baseball game and it went something like this:
Bottom 7th the score is 6-1, runner on 3rd 1 out.
Miguel Cabrera strikes out. Next batter walks.
Now runners at the corners 2 outs.
WILD PITCH, the runner from 3rd gets thrown out at home!
The score is still 6-1 and we go to the bottom of the 8th inning:
The innings starts off with: SINGLE - SINGLE - DOUBLE.
Mind you the double did not score the runner from 1st.
So it is 7-1 now with the runners on 2nd & 3rd NOBODY OUT.
I need one run to push my bet, 2 runs to win it. Any hit pretty much wins it but even without any hits I can win it.
Guess what. NO RUNS SCORE.
It ended up with the Bases Loaded 2 outs, full count and the batter swinging at a pitch in the dirt!!!
That was a 56-unit swing! I could not imagine a worst possible beat in baseball.
But guess what, I make a 3-team parlay in the afternoon games and guess how I did...
...
......
......
......
......
......
......
2-fucking-1
I had the Over 9 in the baseball game and it went something like this:
Bottom 7th the score is 6-1, runner on 3rd 1 out.
Miguel Cabrera strikes out. Next batter walks.
Now runners at the corners 2 outs.
WILD PITCH, the runner from 3rd gets thrown out at home!
The score is still 6-1 and we go to the bottom of the 8th inning:
The innings starts off with: SINGLE - SINGLE - DOUBLE.
Mind you the double did not score the runner from 1st.
So it is 7-1 now with the runners on 2nd & 3rd NOBODY OUT.
I need one run to push my bet, 2 runs to win it. Any hit pretty much wins it but even without any hits I can win it.
Guess what. NO RUNS SCORE.
It ended up with the Bases Loaded 2 outs, full count and the batter swinging at a pitch in the dirt!!!
That was a 56-unit swing! I could not imagine a worst possible beat in baseball.
But guess what, I make a 3-team parlay in the afternoon games and guess how I did...
...
......
......
......
......
......
......
2-fucking-1
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
445,683
-
Tuesday 09/08/2026
970
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
253,202
-
Couple thoughts
2,692
-
Tuesday
2,320
-
Breathtaking ....truly
20,478
-
We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever
26,696
-
Obviously the true face of the republican party
30,554
-
NCAA FOOTBALL. 151
15,096
-
pg mlb 2026 season thread
6,320
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
