Posted:
#1
...is it 12 wins
13
14
15
16
17?
I realize that hypothetically one could pick 25 winners in a row, however, the likelihood of reaching a number over 17 is relatively slim (see STREAK SURVIVOR ALLSTAR leaderboard). Only 40 people have streaked past 17 in covers' history. The only problem with this is the unpredictability of when each individual will post their plays...and trying to catch their play in time to place your own wager on the opposite.
Maybe this is a bad idea? It seems way too easy to me. Wait until someone makes it to 15 in a row, then bet the opposite of whatever they pick in a progression - until they lose/you win.
I would be absolutely shocked if COVERS was not doing this already.
13
14
15
16
17?
I realize that hypothetically one could pick 25 winners in a row, however, the likelihood of reaching a number over 17 is relatively slim (see STREAK SURVIVOR ALLSTAR leaderboard). Only 40 people have streaked past 17 in covers' history. The only problem with this is the unpredictability of when each individual will post their plays...and trying to catch their play in time to place your own wager on the opposite.
Maybe this is a bad idea? It seems way too easy to me. Wait until someone makes it to 15 in a row, then bet the opposite of whatever they pick in a progression - until they lose/you win.
I would be absolutely shocked if COVERS was not doing this already.
0
Hot Forum Topics
