All Forums | Systems & Strategies

2010 NCAA Fave/Over - Dog/Under % Correlation Parlays Thread

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 150595
Posts: 1664
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 217
Posted: #1376
Quote Originally Posted by FFCJ82:

WEEK 6

Link to WEEK 5 fixed.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 217
Posted: #1377
Quote Originally Posted by dlunc3:

hey man, nice job again on the spreadsheet...

i think you may have missed on the purdue game first half

Got it in there now. Thanks for the heads up!
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 18253
Posted: #1378
Clemson - BC is now -21 / 52 making it 41% and a play for today
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 18253
Posted: #1379
Clemson - BC is now -21.5 / 52 making it 41% and a play for today
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 477
Posted: #1380
This looks really good, too bad I can't find ANY local bookmakers at all around my area.

Tried a few online bookies as well, all invalid plays, oddly enough ;)

Keep it up though, this is great if you have bookies who will let you play the bets.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 1510
Posted: #1381
This thing is really dumb. If you go 7-3, your really going 7-6 because on those three loses your losing twice. Whats the point?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1175
Posted: #1382

Quote Originally Posted by youngunner10:

This thing is really dumb. If you go 7-3, your really going 7-6 because on those three loses your losing twice. Whats the point?

Do the math. You do realize that parlays pay a little better than 1-1?

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 18253
Posted: #1383

Quote Originally Posted by youngunner10:

This thing is really dumb. If you go 7-3, your really going 7-6 because on those three loses your losing twice. Whats the point?

you obviously don't get it and aren't good at math lol

re-read it....

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 217
Posted: #1384
Quote Originally Posted by youngunner10:

This thing is really dumb. If you go 7-3, your really going 7-6 because on those three loses your losing twice. Whats the point?

It's all right here genius...but honestly I'm perfectly okay with you missing out.

WEEK 6
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 1510
Posted: #1385
Lets look the WEEK 5. Full games went 4-3.

so for those 4 wins you had 4 loses.
for those 3 loses you had 6 loses.

record = 4-10

lets just say the parlay pays 2-1

you would finish with an 8-10 record which = losing money
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 217
Posted: #1386
Quote Originally Posted by youngunner10:

Lets look the WEEK 5. Full games went 4-3.

so for those 4 wins you had 4 loses.
for those 3 loses you had 6 loses.

record = 4-10

lets just say the parlay pays 2-1

you would finish with an 8-10 record which = losing money

Okay, let's look at week 5...41% plays went 11-4. Now lets use a nice round number for you so you can understand...$100 per side. Now, since you're obviously an experienced gambler should know a 2 team parlay pays 2.6 to 1...but i'm sure you already knew that. So here's the breakdown.

11 wins x $260 = $2860   $2860 - 11 losses ($100) = $1860

$1860 - 4 overall losses (@ $200 ea.) = $1060

$1060 Net gain...yep that's just stupid. I see your point. You should tell us all your secret to winning.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 217
Posted: #1387
Man this has been an awesome day and I'm letting some retard on here piss me off....
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 1510
Posted: #1388
sure, if you would have only played full games you would have lost money
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 18253
Posted: #1389

Quote Originally Posted by FFCJ82:

Man this has been an awesome day and I'm letting some retard on here piss me off....

awesome day, wish I could get in on the first half action. They are on fire!!!

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 18253
Posted: #1390

Quote Originally Posted by youngunner10:

sure, if you would have only played full games you would have lost money

you didn't do well in Math class did you.

4 wins at 180 per win. 3 losses at 220 per loss....+60 for a $100 per parlay better.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 1510
Posted: #1391
if a parlay pays 2.6 then your 4 wins will yield 160$ not 180$

you do the math

the numbers are there week 5 full games lost money
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 1510
Posted: #1392
my bad your right +40$ for full games
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 217
Posted: #1393
Quote Originally Posted by youngunner10:

if a parlay pays 2.6 then your 4 wins will yield 160$ not 180$

you do the math

the numbers are there week 5 full games lost money

I have an idea to resolve our issue....

HOW ABOUT YOUR DUMB ASS BOOKS MY BETS, AND EVERYBODY ELSE'S BETS ON HERE THAT CAN'T FIND A BOOK TO TAKE THEM. ACCORDING TO YOUR THEORY YOU'LL BE RICH IN NO TIME!!!
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 18253
Posted: #1394

Quote Originally Posted by youngunner10:

if a parlay pays 2.6 then your 4 wins will yield 160$ not 180$

you do the math

the numbers are there week 5 full games lost money

There is always confusion here with online players. People who bet with a local have to pay 10% juice on bets. A $110 parlay pay 2.9 to 1.

You can't bet these online hence the 2.9 to 1 paying +$180 on a win. 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 1510
Posted: #1395
how is it that boston college wasnt a play at -21 and o/u 52 (40.38)

and toledo was a play at -21 and o/u 52 (40.38)

i think some of your record is skewed in your favor

These are closing odds taken from covers
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 18253
Posted: #1396

FFCJ makes his spreadsheet in the morning.

Look at post #1379 from me (scroll up, it's on this page). I posted that the line had moved and it should be a play now.
I'm always watching the games and playing them as they change as most of the guys who play this system should be as well.

You seem to care a lot for something you think doesn't work although we have loads of evidence it does, including the stacks of cash we are winning lol.

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 2179
Posted: #1397
exellent day
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 18253
Posted: #1398
 went off the 40% games and played the BAMA-VANDY game
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1175
Posted: #1399
Quote Originally Posted by powerade:

awesome day, wish I could get in on the first half action. They are on fire!!!

17-4 1H's with BYU pending. Took down five figures today.

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1175
Posted: #1400
BYU just won 18-4 today in 1H. Why isn't there year round football??????
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.