• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 1
      NFL Week 1
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Systems & Strategies

    73-32 Remarkably Simple NBA System

    12 Next Last»
    BCap888
    Borat38
    Buford1
    Air1
    Alldaygambler28
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 4716
    Posts: 28
    12 Next Last»
     
    BCap888
    BCap888
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2012
    Posts: 823
    Posted: Jan. 29, 2013 - 2:18 AM ET #1

    Through 105 system games this season, I’ve found a 70% NBA Against the Spread winner. 73 Wins and 32 Losses. I actually found this accidentally and just backtested the results on this season’s games so far. It’s remarkably simple once you understand it but at first it might not make sense. What we’re looking for are FAVORITES that were UNDERDOGS in their last game. Those teams pass the first test of the system. Once we have those teams we’re looking for the ones that the point spread from the last game to this game has shifted by MORE THAN 10 POINTS, which is confusing as hell to explain without an example:

    Jan. 25 Spurs +1.5 at Mavericks (W)

    Jan. 26 Spurs -9.5 vs. Suns (L)

    In those back to back games the Spurs went from a DOG to a FAV and the spread moved by 11 points. If that’s still difficult to comprehend just remove the plus and minus and add the spreads together.

    Now, when the Spurs line came out at -9.5 (or -9 for that matter) we had a system trigger. The system is to take the opposite ATS result of the previous game. Since the Spurs covered against the Mavericks, our bet would have been on the Suns +9.5. Like I said it’s fairly confusing at first glance but after a while you’re just looking for a FAV following a DOG and then it’s pretty easy. I’ll explain why this makes logical sense in the next post. BOL.

    CAP

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.

    Through 105 system games this season, I’ve found a 70% NBA Against the Spread winner. 73 Wins and 32 Losses. I actually found this accidentally and just backtested the results on this season’s games so far. It’s remarkably simple once you understand it but at first it might not make sense. What we’re looking for are FAVORITES that were UNDERDOGS in their last game. Those teams pass the first test of the system. Once we have those teams we’re looking for the ones that the point spread from the last game to this game has shifted by MORE THAN 10 POINTS, which is confusing as hell to explain without an example:

    Jan. 25 Spurs +1.5 at Mavericks (W)

    Jan. 26 Spurs -9.5 vs. Suns (L)

    In those back to back games the Spurs went from a DOG to a FAV and the spread moved by 11 points. If that’s still difficult to comprehend just remove the plus and minus and add the spreads together.

    Now, when the Spurs line came out at -9.5 (or -9 for that matter) we had a system trigger. The system is to take the opposite ATS result of the previous game. Since the Spurs covered against the Mavericks, our bet would have been on the Suns +9.5. Like I said it’s fairly confusing at first glance but after a while you’re just looking for a FAV following a DOG and then it’s pretty easy. I’ll explain why this makes logical sense in the next post. BOL.

    CAP

     
    BCap888
    BCap888
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2012
    Posts: 823
    Posted: Jan. 29, 2013 - 2:27 AM ET #2

    If you care, an explanation on why the above system should work:

    When a line moves by more than 10 points from one game to the next for a team, it's usually because the two teams they were playing were very different. Because the team in question is almost always exactly the same from one game to the next. If a team covers as a dog and is a favorite in their next game that means they're almost always playing a worse team in the second game than the first. This means complacency can set in. On the flip side if a team fails to cover against the better team, there's a good chance they're looking to make up for it when they go against the inferior team next time out as a favorite. I was shocked that the results were as successful as they were and hopefully they can stay that way the rest of the year. BOL.

    CAP
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    If you care, an explanation on why the above system should work:

    When a line moves by more than 10 points from one game to the next for a team, it's usually because the two teams they were playing were very different. Because the team in question is almost always exactly the same from one game to the next. If a team covers as a dog and is a favorite in their next game that means they're almost always playing a worse team in the second game than the first. This means complacency can set in. On the flip side if a team fails to cover against the better team, there's a good chance they're looking to make up for it when they go against the inferior team next time out as a favorite. I was shocked that the results were as successful as they were and hopefully they can stay that way the rest of the year. BOL.

    CAP
     
    BCap888
    BCap888
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2012
    Posts: 823
    Posted: Jan. 29, 2013 - 2:33 AM ET #3

    Tomorrow there is actually a hit for this system:

    Portland  -2.5

    They were 8.5 point dogs against the Clippers last game and failed to cover so I'm looking for them to cover at home against Dallas. If the Lakers line moves up to -7.5 I'll be on the Hornets in that game since the Lakers covered as 3 point dogs against OKC. For now though just the one.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Tomorrow there is actually a hit for this system:

    Portland  -2.5

    They were 8.5 point dogs against the Clippers last game and failed to cover so I'm looking for them to cover at home against Dallas. If the Lakers line moves up to -7.5 I'll be on the Hornets in that game since the Lakers covered as 3 point dogs against OKC. For now though just the one.
     
    Borat38
    Borat38
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2008
    Posts: 4749
    Posted: Jan. 29, 2013 - 10:13 AM ET #4

    Be careful with POR though, as this is POR's 3rd game in 4 nights, and because their bench is the least productive at 16.5 ppg, POR starters log in the most playing minutes of any NBA team.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Be careful with POR though, as this is POR's 3rd game in 4 nights, and because their bench is the least productive at 16.5 ppg, POR starters log in the most playing minutes of any NBA team.
     
    BCap888
    BCap888
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2012
    Posts: 823
    Posted: Jan. 29, 2013 - 11:32 AM ET #5

    Hornets are at +7.5 and are a play. I've Locked in Blazers -2.5 and Hornets +7.5. BOL
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Hornets are at +7.5 and are a play. I've Locked in Blazers -2.5 and Hornets +7.5. BOL
     
    Buford1
    Buford1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2009
    Posts: 56
    Posted: Jan. 29, 2013 - 12:03 PM ET #6

    BCap,

    What site are you using for backtesting?

    Thx
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    BCap,

    What site are you using for backtesting?

    Thx
     
    BCap888
    BCap888
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2012
    Posts: 823
    Posted: Jan. 29, 2013 - 12:30 PM ET #7

    The Gold Sheet
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    The Gold Sheet
     
    Air1
    Air1
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 909
    Posted: Jan. 29, 2013 - 12:44 PM ET #8

    cap do you only use opening line or closing lines? Or if it moves within the 10 pt range during the day (i.e opened and closed at 9.5, but at one pt was 10.5)?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    cap do you only use opening line or closing lines? Or if it moves within the 10 pt range during the day (i.e opened and closed at 9.5, but at one pt was 10.5)?
     
    BCap888
    BCap888
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2012
    Posts: 823
    Posted: Jan. 29, 2013 - 12:56 PM ET #9

    I only used the closing lines from TGS. However while going through the games it occurred to me that 10 points was sort of an arbitrary number and that a lot of games were hitting going off at 9 or 9.5 also. Because of that I'd be comfortable jumping on a game when the line hits 10 points difference because it's most likely not going to stray too far. And let's remember that the whole idea was that the opponent was much different from the last one. 9, 9.5, or 10 points are all about the same, to me, for that purpose. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I only used the closing lines from TGS. However while going through the games it occurred to me that 10 points was sort of an arbitrary number and that a lot of games were hitting going off at 9 or 9.5 also. Because of that I'd be comfortable jumping on a game when the line hits 10 points difference because it's most likely not going to stray too far. And let's remember that the whole idea was that the opponent was much different from the last one. 9, 9.5, or 10 points are all about the same, to me, for that purpose. 
     
    Alldaygambler28
    Alldaygambler28
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2008
    Posts: 1456
    Posted: Jan. 29, 2013 - 1:53 PM ET #10

    I got it at 95-95 last year roughly that is using 10 pt closing lines from pinnacle.  Perhaps the shortened season affected results.   
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I got it at 95-95 last year roughly that is using 10 pt closing lines from pinnacle.  Perhaps the shortened season affected results.   
     
    BCap888
    BCap888
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2012
    Posts: 823
    Posted: Jan. 29, 2013 - 1:57 PM ET #11

    Thanks ADG. I'm going to see how it starts as of now and if it starts losing, then maybe it's more of a better bet to fade as it moves closer back down to the .500 mark.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Thanks ADG. I'm going to see how it starts as of now and if it starts losing, then maybe it's more of a better bet to fade as it moves closer back down to the .500 mark.
     
    BCap888
    BCap888
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2012
    Posts: 823
    Posted: Jan. 29, 2013 - 11:17 PM ET #12

    Not looking good for tonight. Tomorrow Sacramento taking +7 from Boston is a play as long as it's 7 or more. Toronto is also a play at +6.5 against Atlanta. Probably not catching as many points as we would have on Sacramento if Rondo was playing but more than 6.5 is enough for me. BOL.

    CAP
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Not looking good for tonight. Tomorrow Sacramento taking +7 from Boston is a play as long as it's 7 or more. Toronto is also a play at +6.5 against Atlanta. Probably not catching as many points as we would have on Sacramento if Rondo was playing but more than 6.5 is enough for me. BOL.

    CAP
     
    Air1
    Air1
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 909
    Posted: Jan. 30, 2013 - 12:09 AM ET #13

    Hey cap i'm backtesting this system and its giving me a headache. I am using covers lines closing at 9.5. The way you posted the system it is hitting ~50%.
    I have noticed that a team can go on a steak with this system so by the end of the season I can see it settling close to 50% again.

    I thought of some filters. Must open previous game as a dog and betting game as a fave...Only play if previous game is a win only or loss only. Only play certain teams. Only play certain teams if previous was a win only or if previous was a loss only. A total filter?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Hey cap i'm backtesting this system and its giving me a headache. I am using covers lines closing at 9.5. The way you posted the system it is hitting ~50%.
    I have noticed that a team can go on a steak with this system so by the end of the season I can see it settling close to 50% again.

    I thought of some filters. Must open previous game as a dog and betting game as a fave...Only play if previous game is a win only or loss only. Only play certain teams. Only play certain teams if previous was a win only or if previous was a loss only. A total filter?
     
    BCap888
    BCap888
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2012
    Posts: 823
    Posted: Jan. 30, 2013 - 1:03 AM ET #14

    1-1 Since Post 74-33 YTD.

    Would have rather had Portland continue to get their teeth kicked in rather than win the game with no cover. 

    Air are you testing for this season and getting around 50%? And filters would definitely help but I don't know what you mean by a team can go on a streak. We're not really going to be betting into streaks since most times we're never betting a team in back to back games. Unless we're betting against a FAV and then betting on that same DOG in their next game as a FAV. I'd love to hear some more suggestions though if you have them, I'm not exactly married to the way I presented the system.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    1-1 Since Post 74-33 YTD.

    Would have rather had Portland continue to get their teeth kicked in rather than win the game with no cover. 

    Air are you testing for this season and getting around 50%? And filters would definitely help but I don't know what you mean by a team can go on a streak. We're not really going to be betting into streaks since most times we're never betting a team in back to back games. Unless we're betting against a FAV and then betting on that same DOG in their next game as a FAV. I'd love to hear some more suggestions though if you have them, I'm not exactly married to the way I presented the system.
     
    Air1
    Air1
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 909
    Posted: Jan. 30, 2013 - 4:38 AM ET #15

    I tested previous seasons. Not this season. And when I spoke about streaks, I meant chasing a team for 3 games to win 1 unit does not work.  A team can start out 2-0 and end up 4-6.

    I think there might be something by breaking it down by teams and only playing if previous game was a win ats or only play if previous was a loss ats.
    i.e boston is only a play if they won their previous as a dog and are now favs - they usually lose in this situation. Or atlanta lost their previous game as a dog and are now faves.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I tested previous seasons. Not this season. And when I spoke about streaks, I meant chasing a team for 3 games to win 1 unit does not work.  A team can start out 2-0 and end up 4-6.

    I think there might be something by breaking it down by teams and only playing if previous game was a win ats or only play if previous was a loss ats.
    i.e boston is only a play if they won their previous as a dog and are now favs - they usually lose in this situation. Or atlanta lost their previous game as a dog and are now faves.
     
    Budman717
    Budman717
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2008
    Posts: 108
    Posted: Jan. 30, 2013 - 7:47 AM ET #16

    BCap;

    If I understand the system correctly, wouldn't Det +8 @ Ind also be a play?  Ind was a dog in their last game by 5.5 and they covered.

    Thanks for the work on this.  It looks promising.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    BCap;

    If I understand the system correctly, wouldn't Det +8 @ Ind also be a play?  Ind was a dog in their last game by 5.5 and they covered.

    Thanks for the work on this.  It looks promising.

     
    1958a
    1958a
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2008
    Posts: 142
    Posted: Jan. 30, 2013 - 1:08 PM ET #17

    Bcap,
    I remember you from a very interesting MLB thread last season.
    did you do an SDQL query on this?  you are so good at it...

    F and p:D and p:line-line>10 and p:ats margin>0 and season=2012
    15-38 ats GREAT!

    D and p:F and line-p:line>10 and p:ats margin<0 and season=2012
    14-39 ats GREAT!

    but if you check another season, this is NOT GOOD

    please check my queries and answer back
    SU results look very interesting.
    my regards
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Bcap,
    I remember you from a very interesting MLB thread last season.
    did you do an SDQL query on this?  you are so good at it...

    F and p:D and p:line-line>10 and p:ats margin>0 and season=2012
    15-38 ats GREAT!

    D and p:F and line-p:line>10 and p:ats margin<0 and season=2012
    14-39 ats GREAT!

    but if you check another season, this is NOT GOOD

    please check my queries and answer back
    SU results look very interesting.
    my regards
     
    BCap888
    BCap888
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2012
    Posts: 823
    Posted: Jan. 30, 2013 - 3:44 PM ET #18

    Sorry guys power has been out all day.

    Budman you are right Detroit +8 is a play. 

    Toronto +6.5
    Sacramento +7
    Detroit +8

    1958 I didn't query this but yours look right. As I mentioned earlier I'll be looking to maybe fade this if it starts moving back towards .500. I'll be back later with some more stuff, not much time right this second. BOL guys.

    CAP
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Sorry guys power has been out all day.

    Budman you are right Detroit +8 is a play. 

    Toronto +6.5
    Sacramento +7
    Detroit +8

    1958 I didn't query this but yours look right. As I mentioned earlier I'll be looking to maybe fade this if it starts moving back towards .500. I'll be back later with some more stuff, not much time right this second. BOL guys.

    CAP
     
    BCap888
    BCap888
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2012
    Posts: 823
    Posted: Jan. 30, 2013 - 10:03 PM ET #19

    OK 1958 and Air: I just queried through some filters and found a relatively successful one. If we add that the total has to be under 193 both sides of the system (previous winners or previous losers) have combined for 29-7 this season. Although Detroit not covering tonight made it 29-8. It's very confusing, at least for me, to explain which system is which so I'll just include the query:

    line<0 and 0<p:line and p:line-line>10 and p:ats margin>0 and total<193 and season=2012

    D and p:F and line-p:line>10 and p:ats margin<0 and total<193 and season=2012

    1958 I'm going to do something very similar for baseball again this season, can I PM you the plan?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    OK 1958 and Air: I just queried through some filters and found a relatively successful one. If we add that the total has to be under 193 both sides of the system (previous winners or previous losers) have combined for 29-7 this season. Although Detroit not covering tonight made it 29-8. It's very confusing, at least for me, to explain which system is which so I'll just include the query:

    line<0 and 0<p:line and p:line-line>10 and p:ats margin>0 and total<193 and season=2012

    D and p:F and line-p:line>10 and p:ats margin<0 and total<193 and season=2012

    1958 I'm going to do something very similar for baseball again this season, can I PM you the plan?
     
    1958a
    1958a
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2008
    Posts: 142
    Posted: Jan. 31, 2013 - 4:30 PM ET #20

    What about 2011? not good at all...



    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    What about 2011? not good at all...



     
    BCap888
    BCap888
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2012
    Posts: 823
    Posted: Jan. 31, 2013 - 6:12 PM ET #21

    Yeah I know which is why I'm going to start fading the system as of the next time there is a play. There isn't one tonight.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Yeah I know which is why I'm going to start fading the system as of the next time there is a play. There isn't one tonight.
     
    BCap888
    BCap888
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2012
    Posts: 823
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2013 - 2:26 PM ET #22

    To fade the system tonight we have Washington +6 and Cleveland +4.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    To fade the system tonight we have Washington +6 and Cleveland +4.
     
    cactusjack
    cactusjack
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 35
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2013 - 4:22 PM ET #23

    I understand the original system, but can you give an example on the fade system.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    I understand the original system, but can you give an example on the fade system.

     
    Air1
    Air1
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 909
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2013 - 5:13 PM ET #24

    Quote Originally Posted by cactusjack:

    I understand the original system, but can you give an example on the fade system.


    Jack, i believe he means to just fade the original system
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by cactusjack:

    I understand the original system, but can you give an example on the fade system.


    Jack, i believe he means to just fade the original system
     
     
    BCap888
    BCap888
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2012
    Posts: 823
    Posted: Feb. 1, 2013 - 10:28 PM ET #25

    Yeah I'm scrapping this. Not enough evidence for me to be confident anymore. See you for baseball season fellas.

    CAP
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Yeah I'm scrapping this. Not enough evidence for me to be confident anymore. See you for baseball season fellas.

    CAP
    All Forums | Systems & Strategies
    12 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Monday 9/14/2026 680 Covers arrow
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 57,671 Covers arrow
    • Couple Beers 1,970 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 97,191 Covers arrow
    • Trump's legacy? 25,357 Covers arrow
    • Week One-Post Week One Plays Here 1,849 Covers arrow
    • Betting NFL isnt the same anymore Tapping out. 1,269 Covers arrow
    • *** MONDAY NFL *** 5,734 Covers arrow
    • We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever 26,733 Covers arrow
    • 2026 POW Week 1 322 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.