JM: A 12/05 Nuggets +3.5/+6.5 W by 7 21-0
AJM: A 12/05 Spurs -3.5 L by 7
B 12/07 76ers +6.5 L by 10
C 12/08 Bobcats +3.5 W by 12 23-2
Version 2.0 Play
JM: A 12/06 Cavs -7/-4 W by 15 22-0
AJM: A 12/06 Bucks +7 L by 15
B 12/08 Griz +8 W by 2 24-2
JM is retracting the play:
Congrats on yet another easy v2.0 NBA winner with Golden State!
We're completely undefeated so far this NBA season with my v2.0 system!
As a customer of my NBA v2.0 system, I want to send you a reminder
of our upcoming NBA v2.0 betting series:
[A] 12/10/09 Boston Thu @ Washington
[b] 12/12/09 Boston Sat @ Chicago
[C] 12/14/09 Boston Mon @ Memphis
Note: Boston has the best road record. This increases the risk for
your wager.
This means that you would make the [A] wager for the road team on
the left on the date that the game is played. Remember to purchase
3 points for the team you're betting on.
Email response from Lan Tan from V2 subscriber's question:
Got an e-mail from JM when I questioned only 1 opponent in the 3 games being cross-conference instead of 2 per V2 rules and he said it was a "mistake but he assures me it's still a very good series to bet on".
Shouln't cout this one, it might mess up your data.
JM is retracting the play:
Congrats on yet another easy v2.0 NBA winner with Golden State!
We're completely undefeated so far this NBA season with my v2.0 system!
As a customer of my NBA v2.0 system, I want to send you a reminder
of our upcoming NBA v2.0 betting series:
[A] 12/10/09 Boston Thu @ Washington
[b] 12/12/09 Boston Sat @ Chicago
[C] 12/14/09 Boston Mon @ Memphis
Note: Boston has the best road record. This increases the risk for
your wager.
This means that you would make the [A] wager for the road team on
the left on the date that the game is played. Remember to purchase
3 points for the team you're betting on.
Email response from Lan Tan from V2 subscriber's question:
Got an e-mail from JM when I questioned only 1 opponent in the 3 games being cross-conference instead of 2 per V2 rules and he said it was a "mistake but he assures me it's still a very good series to bet on".
Shouln't cout this one, it might mess up your data.
Because the Celtics were at the Wizards, a really strong system would have them both come out winners! LOL Well at least a win for AJM.
Because the Celtics were at the Wizards, a really strong system would have them both come out winners! LOL Well at least a win for AJM.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.