For those who prefer simplicity, here's a super-easy system I've played throughout the years that always grinds out a profit...some years better than others. So far this year its been a pretty good earner (+23 units on a 35 unit BR in only a month of play...not bad). Barring disaster, it should produce at least 80+ units.
The system: Play ON the "OVER" in the game with the biggest favorite. That's it! As a disclaimer, I'm not always rigid in this pick and will cap on occasion, but the pick is ALWAYS on a lob-sided contest. If I see another game that's a lob-sided contest and I feel better about it, I'll play it (especially if the fave in that contest is the visitor and is assured the 9 at-bats). I play this is as a 4-game chase on a straight marty.
BR: I recommend no less than 35 units to start. This accounts for two losses though there have been none this season (In fact, it hasn't gone past a "B" game this season). Expect to get lightly juiced on the play.
For those who care, I will be posting the (one) daily play in this forum and will be using Boyd's prices. GL to any and all who follow
Today's Play:Risk Amt
(A) CWS over 7 -115 1.15u
YTD: +23 units
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
For those who prefer simplicity, here's a super-easy system I've played throughout the years that always grinds out a profit...some years better than others. So far this year its been a pretty good earner (+23 units on a 35 unit BR in only a month of play...not bad). Barring disaster, it should produce at least 80+ units.
The system: Play ON the "OVER" in the game with the biggest favorite. That's it! As a disclaimer, I'm not always rigid in this pick and will cap on occasion, but the pick is ALWAYS on a lob-sided contest. If I see another game that's a lob-sided contest and I feel better about it, I'll play it (especially if the fave in that contest is the visitor and is assured the 9 at-bats). I play this is as a 4-game chase on a straight marty.
BR: I recommend no less than 35 units to start. This accounts for two losses though there have been none this season (In fact, it hasn't gone past a "B" game this season). Expect to get lightly juiced on the play.
For those who care, I will be posting the (one) daily play in this forum and will be using Boyd's prices. GL to any and all who follow
Although using opening lines, Mets were a bigger fav than Jays on the 4th- so that would be just 3 losses in a row. Not big on chase systems but with a good size bankroll it makes sense. I've got one where I just pick my dog of the day in bases and always try to make a unit. Good luck with your overs.
0
Although using opening lines, Mets were a bigger fav than Jays on the 4th- so that would be just 3 losses in a row. Not big on chase systems but with a good size bankroll it makes sense. I've got one where I just pick my dog of the day in bases and always try to make a unit. Good luck with your overs.
I've got it losing 4 times in a row from May 1st thru the 4th. Hardly consistent with never going past a B play,
Thanks for the input, but I'm not trying to snow anyone here buddy. As I stated in Post #1, I'm not rigid in my pick and do cap on occasion (though ALWAYS play a lob-sided affair). My May results are as follows:
5/1 (A)Cubs OVER 7 push
5/2 (A)Mets OVER 7.5 won
5/3 (A)Cubs OVER 7 won
5/4 (A)Mets OVER 7 won
5/5 (A)Mets OVER 7 won
5/6 (A)Giants OVER 7 won
5/7 (A)Cws OVER 7 won
5/8 (A)Cubs OVER 7.5 loss
I have no doubt that "C" and "D" plays will come (even the eventual loss), but my May results are VERY CONSISTENT with never going past a "B" play
0
Quote Originally Posted by vinnyherbert:
I've got it losing 4 times in a row from May 1st thru the 4th. Hardly consistent with never going past a B play,
Thanks for the input, but I'm not trying to snow anyone here buddy. As I stated in Post #1, I'm not rigid in my pick and do cap on occasion (though ALWAYS play a lob-sided affair). My May results are as follows:
5/1 (A)Cubs OVER 7 push
5/2 (A)Mets OVER 7.5 won
5/3 (A)Cubs OVER 7 won
5/4 (A)Mets OVER 7 won
5/5 (A)Mets OVER 7 won
5/6 (A)Giants OVER 7 won
5/7 (A)Cws OVER 7 won
5/8 (A)Cubs OVER 7.5 loss
I have no doubt that "C" and "D" plays will come (even the eventual loss), but my May results are VERY CONSISTENT with never going past a "B" play
Thanks for posting, I always appreciate others having some input to these forums. However I do have one concern with the way you go about your business, and that is the fact that in post 1 you have started your unit count at +23units, and are now counting based on that. As far as Im concerned if you havent been documenting your plays, you start at ZERO. Please adjust your figures moving forward to give a true representation of your plays.
0
Thanks for posting, I always appreciate others having some input to these forums. However I do have one concern with the way you go about your business, and that is the fact that in post 1 you have started your unit count at +23units, and are now counting based on that. As far as Im concerned if you havent been documenting your plays, you start at ZERO. Please adjust your figures moving forward to give a true representation of your plays.
Thanks for posting, I always appreciate others having some input to these forums. However I do have one concern with the way you go about your business, and that is the fact that in post 1 you have started your unit count at +23units, and are now counting based on that. As far as Im concerned if you havent been documenting your plays, you start at ZERO. Please adjust your figures moving forward to give a true representation of your plays.
I'd agree with this especially if you look at the lines, there very well could have been a 4 game loss May 1-4 as mentioned earlier. The only way that is avoided is if Chaser switched a play to an away team favorite as he mentioned. Since the plays weren't posted it's kind of hard to determine the true units profited.
Maybe add +/- since posting?
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Quote Originally Posted by rivermonsterz:
Thanks for posting, I always appreciate others having some input to these forums. However I do have one concern with the way you go about your business, and that is the fact that in post 1 you have started your unit count at +23units, and are now counting based on that. As far as Im concerned if you havent been documenting your plays, you start at ZERO. Please adjust your figures moving forward to give a true representation of your plays.
I'd agree with this especially if you look at the lines, there very well could have been a 4 game loss May 1-4 as mentioned earlier. The only way that is avoided is if Chaser switched a play to an away team favorite as he mentioned. Since the plays weren't posted it's kind of hard to determine the true units profited.
***excuse the late posting time, just too many distractions today!This was the play I put in, and hopefully those who are following did too***, (I know, I know, "chaser, you cant post this after the game has played"....or "Chaser, these numbers aren't reliable"...blah, blah blah. Treat it like "Ripley's", and believe it or not. Its here for my tracking purposes
YTD: +27units (+4)
0
5/14 Saturday
Today's Play:Risk Amt
(B) Cubs over 8.5 +100 2.1u
YTD: +25.9units (+2.9)
***excuse the late posting time, just too many distractions today!This was the play I put in, and hopefully those who are following did too***, (I know, I know, "chaser, you cant post this after the game has played"....or "Chaser, these numbers aren't reliable"...blah, blah blah. Treat it like "Ripley's", and believe it or not. Its here for my tracking purposes
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
