9/20 Tuesday's Play: OVER on game with strongest road fave
(C) Astros OV 8 -115 risk 5.1U (to win 4.4U)
***Jays are "strongest road fave" today, but I just cant' see that game going over 12 runs***
Not sure what exactly I was looking at when I posted the above (Cards/Rocks?), but the result serves as friendly reminder as to why I rely on systems and not my capping abilities. Going to re-start the chase.
9/21 Wednesday's Play: OVER on game with strongest road fave
(A) Nats OV 7.5 +105 risk 1U
YTD: +37.5units (+14.5)
0
9/20 Tuesday's Play: OVER on game with strongest road fave
(C) Astros OV 8 -115 risk 5.1U (to win 4.4U)
***Jays are "strongest road fave" today, but I just cant' see that game going over 12 runs***
Not sure what exactly I was looking at when I posted the above (Cards/Rocks?), but the result serves as friendly reminder as to why I rely on systems and not my capping abilities. Going to re-start the chase.
9/21 Wednesday's Play: OVER on game with strongest road fave
Chaser,thanks for this system. I learned some things like having a small enough unit size to accommodate a game 5 if needed.Have you thought about playing both HFandAF? Im going to backtest playing both in a Tony Stoffo 8 game parlay.Any insights? And thanks again
0
Chaser,thanks for this system. I learned some things like having a small enough unit size to accommodate a game 5 if needed.Have you thought about playing both HFandAF? Im going to backtest playing both in a Tony Stoffo 8 game parlay.Any insights? And thanks again
Chaser,thanks for this system. I learned some things like having a small enough unit size to accommodate a game 5 if needed.Have you thought about playing both HFandAF? Im going to backtest playing both in a Tony Stoffo 8 game parlay.Any insights? And thanks again
You're welcome, Leo...Hope this simple "over" chase added some units to your roll. As to your question, I've not considered parlaying HF and AF, but would be interested (and appreciative) to know what you discover in the backtest.
0
Quote Originally Posted by leo81:
Chaser,thanks for this system. I learned some things like having a small enough unit size to accommodate a game 5 if needed.Have you thought about playing both HFandAF? Im going to backtest playing both in a Tony Stoffo 8 game parlay.Any insights? And thanks again
You're welcome, Leo...Hope this simple "over" chase added some units to your roll. As to your question, I've not considered parlaying HF and AF, but would be interested (and appreciative) to know what you discover in the backtest.
9/28 Wednesday's Result: OVER on game with strongest road fave
(A) Dodgers OV 8 -105 risk 1.1U WON +1u
***THIS CONCLUDES THE "OVER" CHASE SYSTEM FOR 2016***
STARTING BR: 35 UNITS
FINAL TALLY: +42.5 UNITS
ROI: 121%
final thoughts and "take-aways"...first off, while I fell short of my 50unit goal, I'm quite satisfied with the gain in general (especially given all my goofs of learning along the way). Secondly, The added filter of chasing on "the heavy road fave" only, and stretching the chase to 5 games instead of 4, kept this system in the positive and would have insured the realization of the goal if applied from the start. Finally, "stick to the system, Chaser!"...twice (once after capping) I bailed-out after a "C" bet loss only to win the very next play...this cost no-less than 16units...couple that with the earlier "D" game loss before extending the chase to 5 games and its conceivable that this system would have produced around 80units for the 2016 season.
...to the ice we go...
0
***FINAL CHASE OF THE SEASON***
9/28 Wednesday's Result: OVER on game with strongest road fave
(A) Dodgers OV 8 -105 risk 1.1U WON +1u
***THIS CONCLUDES THE "OVER" CHASE SYSTEM FOR 2016***
STARTING BR: 35 UNITS
FINAL TALLY: +42.5 UNITS
ROI: 121%
final thoughts and "take-aways"...first off, while I fell short of my 50unit goal, I'm quite satisfied with the gain in general (especially given all my goofs of learning along the way). Secondly, The added filter of chasing on "the heavy road fave" only, and stretching the chase to 5 games instead of 4, kept this system in the positive and would have insured the realization of the goal if applied from the start. Finally, "stick to the system, Chaser!"...twice (once after capping) I bailed-out after a "C" bet loss only to win the very next play...this cost no-less than 16units...couple that with the earlier "D" game loss before extending the chase to 5 games and its conceivable that this system would have produced around 80units for the 2016 season.
9/28 Wednesday's Result: OVER on game with strongest road fave
(A) Dodgers OV 8 -105 risk 1.1U WON +1u
***THIS CONCLUDES THE "OVER" CHASE SYSTEM FOR 2016***
STARTING BR: 35 UNITS
FINAL TALLY: +42.5 UNITS
ROI: 121%
final thoughts and "take-aways"...first off, while I fell short of my 50unit goal, I'm quite satisfied with the gain in general (especially given all my goofs of learning along the way).
Secondly, The added filter of chasing on "the heavy road fav" only, and stretching the chase to 5 games instead of 4, kept this system in the positive and would have insured the realization of the goal if applied from the start.
Finally, "stick to the system, Chaser!"...twice (once after capping) I bailed-out after a "C" bet loss only to win the very next play...this cost no-less than 16units...couple that with the earlier "D" game loss before extending the chase to 5 games and its conceivable that this system would have produced around 80units for the 2016 season.
...to the ice we go...
0
Quote Originally Posted by chaser15:
***FINAL CHASE OF THE SEASON***
9/28 Wednesday's Result: OVER on game with strongest road fave
(A) Dodgers OV 8 -105 risk 1.1U WON +1u
***THIS CONCLUDES THE "OVER" CHASE SYSTEM FOR 2016***
STARTING BR: 35 UNITS
FINAL TALLY: +42.5 UNITS
ROI: 121%
final thoughts and "take-aways"...first off, while I fell short of my 50unit goal, I'm quite satisfied with the gain in general (especially given all my goofs of learning along the way).
Secondly, The added filter of chasing on "the heavy road fav" only, and stretching the chase to 5 games instead of 4, kept this system in the positive and would have insured the realization of the goal if applied from the start.
Finally, "stick to the system, Chaser!"...twice (once after capping) I bailed-out after a "C" bet loss only to win the very next play...this cost no-less than 16units...couple that with the earlier "D" game loss before extending the chase to 5 games and its conceivable that this system would have produced around 80units for the 2016 season.
***FINAL CHASE OF THE SEASON***9/28 Wednesday's Result: OVER on game with strongest road fave(A) Dodgers OV 8 -105 risk 1.1U WON +1u***THIS CONCLUDES THE "OVER" CHASE SYSTEM FOR 2016***STARTING BR: 35 UNITSFINAL TALLY: +42.5 UNITSROI: 121%final thoughts and "take-aways"...first off, while I fell short of my 50unit goal, I'm quite satisfied with the gain in general (especially given all my goofs of learning along the way). Secondly, The added filter of chasing on "the heavy road fav" only, and stretching the chase to 5 games instead of 4, kept this system in the positive and would have insured the realization of the goal if applied from the start. Finally, "stick to the system, Chaser!"...twice (once after capping) I bailed-out after a "C" bet loss only to win the very next play...this cost no-less than 16units...couple that with the earlier "D" game loss before extending the chase to 5 games and its conceivable that this system would have produced around 80units for the 2016 season....to the ice we go...
Does the NHL chase start today?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Pendo:
Quote Originally Posted by chaser15:
***FINAL CHASE OF THE SEASON***9/28 Wednesday's Result: OVER on game with strongest road fave(A) Dodgers OV 8 -105 risk 1.1U WON +1u***THIS CONCLUDES THE "OVER" CHASE SYSTEM FOR 2016***STARTING BR: 35 UNITSFINAL TALLY: +42.5 UNITSROI: 121%final thoughts and "take-aways"...first off, while I fell short of my 50unit goal, I'm quite satisfied with the gain in general (especially given all my goofs of learning along the way). Secondly, The added filter of chasing on "the heavy road fav" only, and stretching the chase to 5 games instead of 4, kept this system in the positive and would have insured the realization of the goal if applied from the start. Finally, "stick to the system, Chaser!"...twice (once after capping) I bailed-out after a "C" bet loss only to win the very next play...this cost no-less than 16units...couple that with the earlier "D" game loss before extending the chase to 5 games and its conceivable that this system would have produced around 80units for the 2016 season....to the ice we go...
Ok, I went through the whole thread and you hardly ever even go past B plays, as in you win so often that there is no need. Now its the D play already with -6,1 units. Its time for me to start tailing this. I dont wanna jinx it but I dont see you losing with this system.
I will tail just flat bet in the beginning but might also go with the B, C, D etc. bets later.
Good luck!
0
Ok, I went through the whole thread and you hardly ever even go past B plays, as in you win so often that there is no need. Now its the D play already with -6,1 units. Its time for me to start tailing this. I dont wanna jinx it but I dont see you losing with this system.
I will tail just flat bet in the beginning but might also go with the B, C, D etc. bets later.
Ok, I went through the whole thread and you hardly ever even go past B plays, as in you win so often that there is no need. Now its the D play already with -6,1 units. Its time for me to start tailing this. I dont wanna jinx it but I dont see you losing with this system.
I will tail just flat bet in the beginning but might also go with the B, C, D etc. bets later.
Good luck!
What a dreadful start to this system. The 14.4units lost already has emasculated me to the point of re-starting the chase (a decision which came back to haunt me a couple times last season) so hopefully this bankroll lives to see at least a few more plays before vaporizing.
Scrivero, I don't think flat betting will turn a profit for you unfortunately. A simple back test of last season's wins vs losses probably reveals a losing record, which spells "slow death" for the flat bet. I'm not sure of this...it's just a guess. Run the numbers and let me know if you would please.
Next play on this system will be an "A" wager to win 2units, and will only be chased 3 times (thru the "C" wager).
Mercilessly , there is no qualifying play today.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Scrivero:
Ok, I went through the whole thread and you hardly ever even go past B plays, as in you win so often that there is no need. Now its the D play already with -6,1 units. Its time for me to start tailing this. I dont wanna jinx it but I dont see you losing with this system.
I will tail just flat bet in the beginning but might also go with the B, C, D etc. bets later.
Good luck!
What a dreadful start to this system. The 14.4units lost already has emasculated me to the point of re-starting the chase (a decision which came back to haunt me a couple times last season) so hopefully this bankroll lives to see at least a few more plays before vaporizing.
Scrivero, I don't think flat betting will turn a profit for you unfortunately. A simple back test of last season's wins vs losses probably reveals a losing record, which spells "slow death" for the flat bet. I'm not sure of this...it's just a guess. Run the numbers and let me know if you would please.
Next play on this system will be an "A" wager to win 2units, and will only be chased 3 times (thru the "C" wager).
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.