Hey Eagle, glad it works so good...can you please give me some info or a link to this money management system you refer too? Seems to be worth a look
Hey Eagle, glad it works so good...can you please give me some info or a link to this money management system you refer too? Seems to be worth a look
I am gonna add you as a friend, maybe you can send me some stuff about this then...
I am gonna add you as a friend, maybe you can send me some stuff about this then...
At Wikipedia they refer to it as a roulette system...I guess thats the origin of it? Is that the one you guys are talking about?
At Wikipedia they refer to it as a roulette system...I guess thats the origin of it? Is that the one you guys are talking about?
Guten Morgen Call82!!
You are doing great,the most important for me is your % in right sides,65%!
I noticed that you have different units in some games depending on at what point of the series the teams involved are.I have 4 questions to ask you about the winning units,considering 1 Unit for each play,flat stake without playing 1 unit here and 3 units there,
1.Playing both Fav and Dog as ML but with the same 1 Units each time,the profit would have been how much ?
2.If you were playing the Fav at -1.5 and the Dog as ML how many would have been the winning units so far ?
3.In case of playing both Fav and Dog at -1.5 then the units would have been how many ?
4.In case of playing Fav -1.5 and Dog +1.5 then the units would have been how many ?
Thanks!!
Guten Morgen Call82!!
You are doing great,the most important for me is your % in right sides,65%!
I noticed that you have different units in some games depending on at what point of the series the teams involved are.I have 4 questions to ask you about the winning units,considering 1 Unit for each play,flat stake without playing 1 unit here and 3 units there,
1.Playing both Fav and Dog as ML but with the same 1 Units each time,the profit would have been how much ?
2.If you were playing the Fav at -1.5 and the Dog as ML how many would have been the winning units so far ?
3.In case of playing both Fav and Dog at -1.5 then the units would have been how many ?
4.In case of playing Fav -1.5 and Dog +1.5 then the units would have been how many ?
Thanks!!
Guten Morgen Call82!!
You are doing great,the most important for me is your % in right sides,65%!
I noticed that you have different units in some games depending on at what point of the series the teams involved are.I have 4 questions to ask you about the winning units,considering 1 Unit for each play,flat stake without playing 1 unit here and 3 units there,
1.Playing both Fav and Dog as ML but with the same 1 Units each time,the profit would have been how much ?
2.If you were playing the Fav at -1.5 and the Dog as ML how many would have been the winning units so far ?
3.In case of playing both Fav and Dog at -1.5 then the units would have been how many ?
4.In case of playing Fav -1.5 and Dog +1.5 then the units would have been how many ?
Thanks!!
Hellas!
I can pretty fast answer all of your questions:
I have no idea...question 1 might be the easiest one to answer but I havent checked that, with respect to the others I wanna be honest with you: Its too much work to check that, I am one hell of a lazy guy and I really dont feel like checking that...would be a problem to get all the old RL numbers anyway...I hope you understand...but just in case you will find out, I am willing to know
Guten Morgen Call82!!
You are doing great,the most important for me is your % in right sides,65%!
I noticed that you have different units in some games depending on at what point of the series the teams involved are.I have 4 questions to ask you about the winning units,considering 1 Unit for each play,flat stake without playing 1 unit here and 3 units there,
1.Playing both Fav and Dog as ML but with the same 1 Units each time,the profit would have been how much ?
2.If you were playing the Fav at -1.5 and the Dog as ML how many would have been the winning units so far ?
3.In case of playing both Fav and Dog at -1.5 then the units would have been how many ?
4.In case of playing Fav -1.5 and Dog +1.5 then the units would have been how many ?
Thanks!!
Hellas!
I can pretty fast answer all of your questions:
I have no idea...question 1 might be the easiest one to answer but I havent checked that, with respect to the others I wanna be honest with you: Its too much work to check that, I am one hell of a lazy guy and I really dont feel like checking that...would be a problem to get all the old RL numbers anyway...I hope you understand...but just in case you will find out, I am willing to know
No problem,if all the 64 picks you have given so far are in this thread I ll search it and if you want I can send you a message with the results,ok?
No problem,if all the 64 picks you have given so far are in this thread I ll search it and if you want I can send you a message with the results,ok?
No problem,if all the 64 picks you have given so far are in this thread I ll search it and if you want I can send you a message with the results,ok?
They are all in here, it would be great if you´d do that work. Thanks in advance
No problem,if all the 64 picks you have given so far are in this thread I ll search it and if you want I can send you a message with the results,ok?
They are all in here, it would be great if you´d do that work. Thanks in advance
YTD 42-22
+16.65 UNITS
Yesterday 3-1
- 3.48 UNITS
Here are todays picks:
ARI -136; Risking 1.36 UNITS to win 1 UNIT
BOS -138; Risking 1.38 UNITS to win 1 UNIT (and they better win)
MIN -151; Risking 1.51 UNITS to win 1 UNIT
CHW even; Risking 1 UNIT to win 1 UNIT
BOL everyone
YTD 42-22
+16.65 UNITS
Yesterday 3-1
- 3.48 UNITS
Here are todays picks:
ARI -136; Risking 1.36 UNITS to win 1 UNIT
BOS -138; Risking 1.38 UNITS to win 1 UNIT (and they better win)
MIN -151; Risking 1.51 UNITS to win 1 UNIT
CHW even; Risking 1 UNIT to win 1 UNIT
BOL everyone
Labbying this seems like the way to go from a risk management standpoint...I've always had a hard time figuring it out though...maybe because I've always read it in passing and never actually put it into practice with concrete examples to gain an understanding of it.
Labbying this seems like the way to go from a risk management standpoint...I've always had a hard time figuring it out though...maybe because I've always read it in passing and never actually put it into practice with concrete examples to gain an understanding of it.
much appreciated kind sir...love the avatar too
much appreciated kind sir...love the avatar too
Hey call, I've been reading the whole thread, and I'm going to watch this for the whole year
I appreciate all the work you've put into this -- feel free to add me as a friend
supereagle43: i sent you a friend invite and I'm interested in your labby system
jay1234: correct me if I'm wrong, but your avatar is Melissa Midwest, yea?
Hey call, I've been reading the whole thread, and I'm going to watch this for the whole year
I appreciate all the work you've put into this -- feel free to add me as a friend
supereagle43: i sent you a friend invite and I'm interested in your labby system
jay1234: correct me if I'm wrong, but your avatar is Melissa Midwest, yea?
Hey Call82,I did the research of your picks on the questions I had asked you for in the morning and here are the results betting each game with a flat stake of 1 unit.
Total plays 65 Won 44 Lost 21 67.68% as ML the profit is +9.42 Units
Betting Favs Won 38 Lost 13 74.5%
Betting Dogs Won 6 Lost 8 42.85%
Fav ML 38-13 +10.85 Units Fav -1.5 28-23 +14.55 Units
Dog ML 6-8 -1.43 Unit Dog +1.5 7-7 -2.08 Dog -1.5 2-12 -7.3 Units
Hey Call82,I did the research of your picks on the questions I had asked you for in the morning and here are the results betting each game with a flat stake of 1 unit.
Total plays 65 Won 44 Lost 21 67.68% as ML the profit is +9.42 Units
Betting Favs Won 38 Lost 13 74.5%
Betting Dogs Won 6 Lost 8 42.85%
Fav ML 38-13 +10.85 Units Fav -1.5 28-23 +14.55 Units
Dog ML 6-8 -1.43 Unit Dog +1.5 7-7 -2.08 Dog -1.5 2-12 -7.3 Units
Guys, the results you find when you google the labby is not exactly near the way some of us play it. So dont be misled by what you find in the search. The searches give you the original system and the bare basics. There are many variations. I use the 3 line modified labouchere taught by PSIC. It takes a while to become comfortable with because situational questions pop up along the way. It takes a little time and practice to master it. At 1st it is very confusing, but it is really easy when you get it learned. Because of the learning curve involved most people are intimidated away from it towards easier systems like Martingale, but man is it worth learning. Look at my results here compared to the Martingale users. I have played every play of this system with the exception of 1 extra win that I picked up on the Nats and stand at +33.5 Units. If you just Martingaled the same games you are only up 16.5 Units. I guarantee that whatever units Call82 backtested this sytem to give with the Martingale, it would be AT Least 33% higher had he done so with the modified labby and probably more. The win percentage with Calls system is phenominal. You can lose 58% of your picks with the labby and break even. In taking home teams like he does you cant help but to win. This system is so good he could sell it and make a killing. With the right discipline, this is gonna be a fun ride. We still have 10 days of April left and I am already at 33.5 units. There is no telling how high we will end up.
Guys, the results you find when you google the labby is not exactly near the way some of us play it. So dont be misled by what you find in the search. The searches give you the original system and the bare basics. There are many variations. I use the 3 line modified labouchere taught by PSIC. It takes a while to become comfortable with because situational questions pop up along the way. It takes a little time and practice to master it. At 1st it is very confusing, but it is really easy when you get it learned. Because of the learning curve involved most people are intimidated away from it towards easier systems like Martingale, but man is it worth learning. Look at my results here compared to the Martingale users. I have played every play of this system with the exception of 1 extra win that I picked up on the Nats and stand at +33.5 Units. If you just Martingaled the same games you are only up 16.5 Units. I guarantee that whatever units Call82 backtested this sytem to give with the Martingale, it would be AT Least 33% higher had he done so with the modified labby and probably more. The win percentage with Calls system is phenominal. You can lose 58% of your picks with the labby and break even. In taking home teams like he does you cant help but to win. This system is so good he could sell it and make a killing. With the right discipline, this is gonna be a fun ride. We still have 10 days of April left and I am already at 33.5 units. There is no telling how high we will end up.
Hey call, I've been reading the whole thread, and I'm going to watch this for the whole year
I appreciate all the work you've put into this -- feel free to add me as a friend
supereagle43: i sent you a friend invite and I'm interested in your labby system
jay1234: correct me if I'm wrong, but your avatar is Melissa Midwest, yea?
Hey call, I've been reading the whole thread, and I'm going to watch this for the whole year
I appreciate all the work you've put into this -- feel free to add me as a friend
supereagle43: i sent you a friend invite and I'm interested in your labby system
jay1234: correct me if I'm wrong, but your avatar is Melissa Midwest, yea?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.