All Forums | Systems & Strategies

I know what you´re gonna say, its just another chase system...

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 45977
Posts: 806
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 468
Posted: #51
wow i got this at -119 i got to get a different book lol
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 110
Posted: #52
Let's go for them cal!  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1107
Posted: #53
Quote Originally Posted by payday000:

wow i got this at -119 i got to get a different book lol


Yeah man, since the system forces you to play quite an amount of games it definately makes a difference...I highly recommend Matchbook, I didnt find any better...

GL man
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1107
Posted: #54
YTD 1-0-0
+1 UNIT

Todays Picks:

TEX -136 @ Matchbook; Risking 1.36 UNITS to win 1 UNIT
LAA -127 @ Matchbook; Risking 1.27 UNITS to win 1 UNIT
CWS -157 @ Matchbook; Risking 1.57 UNITS to win 1 UNIT
ATL -126 @ Matchbook; Risking 1.26 UNITS to win 1 UNIT

Obviously the first round of series is packed with favorites, lets see how this get started...Boston was obviously a nice start into the season...

BOL everyone
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 1925
Posted: #55

What is the best money management tool to use here?  Any of you vets care to make a call on this?  What about a 4 line progressive Labby set up like this:

Game 1 10-10-10-10
Game 2 20 20-20-20
Game 3 30-30-30-30
Game 4 60-60-60-60

Any other ideas would be greatly appreciated!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 34
Posted: #56
could you explain your thought process of how you've picked boston yesterday? those two teams were first group.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 468
Posted: #57
his first rule is that he plays everyteam which is in group one on their first home game no matter who they play .. it makes sence since a top 12 team rarely gets swept
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 34
Posted: #58
then why was atlanta a play? i thought top 10 standings last year should be a play.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 1925
Posted: #59

Atlanta and the Cubs are both in Group 2.  He doesnt just play teams from Group 1.  Re-read the 1st couple of posts and you should be able to figure it out.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 34
Posted: #60
what about seattle and Oak. they were both in group 2
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 34
Posted: #61
arizona and SD was in same group3
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1107
Posted: #62

Quote Originally Posted by kp4life82:

arizona and SD was in same group3

 

I see that you are confused, which I can understand at this point...ARI and SD wasnt a play for me since SD, OAK and TOR all had the same record and one could argue that SD was in group 2 (which is fair), it wasnt an obvious play so I left it out.

 

Seattle and Oakland is the same thing, with OAK beeing the home team you could argue that they are a group 3 team hosting one from group 2...it was just not an obvious play so I left it out...hope that makes things a little clearer...and as supereagle stated, re-read the first posts, most of it should be explained there...

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1107
Posted: #63

YTD 5-0-0

+5 UNITS

 

 Nice start for the season I would say...todays picks will follow later, BOL everyone

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 3172
Posted: #64

I love your idea Call82!!

Good luck on your next picks

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1107
Posted: #65
Quote Originally Posted by tomius:

I love your idea Call82!!

Good luck on your next picks

 

Thanks man, GL to you too...

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1107
Posted: #66

YTD 5-0-0

+5 UNITS

I checked the schedule and I see the following games on the go!

Todays Picks:

HOU -132 @ Matchbook, Risking 1.32 UNITS to win 1 UNIT

Houston lost the first game of the series, therfore it qualifies!

MIL -137 @ Matchbook, Risking 1.37 UNITS to win 1 UNIT

Milwaukee lost the first game of the series, therfore it qualifies!

OAK -125 @ Matchbook, Risking 1.25 UNITS to win 1 UNIT

Oakland lost the first game of the series, therfor it qualifies!

TB(RL) +114 @ Matchbook, Risking 1 UNIT to win 1.14 UNITS

Tampa Bay is such a heavy favorite that I use the runline (as soon as there are lines higher or eaqual to 175 in both directions I use the runline!). TB is in group 2, BAL in group 3!

 

Good Luck everyone

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 306
Posted: #67
Just a thought to tweak your system,82.  When you use the runline, youmight want to use team's ATS record instead of or in addition to their SU record.  Going one step further, you could evaluate the game based on the home team's HOME ATS record, or even the home team's home ats AND the visiting team's ROAD ATS.  I used these criteria in the second half of NBA this year and it works very well.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 306
Posted: #68
Of course in the NBA, you don't have runlines.  You're dealing with point spreads instead, but the same principles apply.  By the way, 82.  I have no problem understanding you're written English, and your spelling is actually better than a lot of American-born Covers contributors.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1107
Posted: #69

Quote Originally Posted by Snappa:

Just a thought to tweak your system,82.  When you use the runline, youmight want to use team's ATS record instead of or in addition to their SU record.  Going one step further, you could evaluate the game based on the home team's HOME ATS record, or even the home team's home ats AND the visiting team's ROAD ATS.  I used these criteria in the second half of NBA this year and it works very well.

 

Thanks for the English comment, I appreciate it

 

Just to make sure I got you correct with respect to the ATS comment: When taking the runline you mean I should see how much money they made over the course of the season right? I mean, compared to the NBA or NFL where you have point spreads I dont know where the difference between the WL record and the ATS should be...

 

Hope you can help me here...

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1107
Posted: #70

HOU -132 @ Matchbook, Risking 1.32 UNITS to win 1 UNIT

Houston lost the first game of the series, therfore it qualifies!

MIL -137 @ Matchbook, Risking 1.37 UNITS to win 1 UNIT

Milwaukee lost the first game of the series, therfore it qualifies!

OAK -125 @ Matchbook, Risking 1.25 UNITS to win 1 UNIT

Oakland lost the first game of the series, therfor it qualifies!

TB(RL) +114 @ Matchbook, Risking 1 UNIT to win 1.14 UNITS

Tampa Bay is such a heavy favorite that I use the runline (as soon as there are lines higher or eaqual to 175 in both directions I use the runline!). TB is in group 2, BAL in group 3!  I hate it when that happens...the series is done than, I wont pick the next game here since they already won a game!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1107
Posted: #71

YTD 7-2

+4.68 UNITS

Yesterday 2-2

-0.32 UNITS

 

Todays games will follow later, was allready pissed when the A´s didnt make it in the 9th with bases loaded and only 1 out...thankfully they made it in the 10th...

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1107
Posted: #72

Allright, yesterdays was a mixed bag and today seems to be a pure dogs day, so I will wait a little longer to get better lines...the public should push the lines in favour of the favs but I will state the games here now so you can put them on your watchlist:

 

HOU for 2 UNITS: Houston lost the two games of the first series against SF and to be honest, they dont seem to win this one either. But a system is a system and you dont wanna change it, since I left the first game out and had 1 UNIT on them yesterday for today the game is set up with 2 UNITS and hopefully we will be able to get it somewhere in the +140-150 region.

 

CIN for 1 UNIT: its the second game of the series, the first one got lost and now its our time to get in with 1 UNIT, hopefully around +130.

 

KC for 1 UNIT: same thing here, lost game one where I was on the sideline, now I step in in the second of three and plan to put up 1 UNIT in the +130 area as well.

 

Good luck everyone, I will be back later with the actual lines I got.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1107
Posted: #73
[Quote: Originally Posted by Call82]

Allright, yesterdays was a mixed bag and today seems to be a pure dogs day, so I will wait a little longer to get better lines...the public should push the lines in favour of the favs but I will state the games here now so you can put them on your watchlist:

I mean in favor of the dog picks of cause

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 489
Posted: #74
WHAT ABOUT WASHINGTON
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 468
Posted: #75

when you put the two units on huston .... do we factor in the juice we lost to on top of the 2 units or just play the 2 units and hope we get it back on the + line

All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.