AS OF NOW, I'm not going tout. Selling my picks and system would be very profitable. I am a college student who takes time out of studies to constantly check and recheck this system for flaws. If anybody would like to donate my paypal is hampt333@yahoo.com. Otherwise as of the near future I will hold off on going tout!!! thanks to all that follow.
AS OF NOW, I'm not going tout. Selling my picks and system would be very profitable. I am a college student who takes time out of studies to constantly check and recheck this system for flaws. If anybody would like to donate my paypal is hampt333@yahoo.com. Otherwise as of the near future I will hold off on going tout!!! thanks to all that follow.
TO MAKE IT EASIER FOR PEOPLE TO GET PLAYS I HAVE CREATED A FACEBOOK GROUP THAT I WILL ALSO POST PLAYS TO SO YOU CAN EASLIY SEE THE PLAYS ON A MOBILE DEVICE.
ITS CALLED
TO MAKE IT EASIER FOR PEOPLE TO GET PLAYS I HAVE CREATED A FACEBOOK GROUP THAT I WILL ALSO POST PLAYS TO SO YOU CAN EASLIY SEE THE PLAYS ON A MOBILE DEVICE.
ITS CALLED
Hampt333
Been following for about 3 weeks now and like what you have done and the system you have been using is easy to do on your own as well when you explained it. I do though have a hard time following how you’re doing your parlays. Are you using the same indexes or are you using something else? (I may have missed a post in the thread also so sorry if that is the case) Anyhow great work.
T2B
Hampt333
Been following for about 3 weeks now and like what you have done and the system you have been using is easy to do on your own as well when you explained it. I do though have a hard time following how you’re doing your parlays. Are you using the same indexes or are you using something else? (I may have missed a post in the thread also so sorry if that is the case) Anyhow great work.
T2B
Hampt333
Been following for about 3 weeks now and like what you have done and the system you have been using is easy to do on your own as well when you explained it. I do though have a hard time following how you’re doing your parlays. Are you using the same indexes or are you using something else? (I may have missed a post in the thread also so sorry if that is the case) Anyhow great work.
T2B
Hampt333
Been following for about 3 weeks now and like what you have done and the system you have been using is easy to do on your own as well when you explained it. I do though have a hard time following how you’re doing your parlays. Are you using the same indexes or are you using something else? (I may have missed a post in the thread also so sorry if that is the case) Anyhow great work.
T2B
Haha dont buy it then. Doesnt matter to me If you do or not. By the way Hectar, your welcome for the system.
Haha dont buy it then. Doesnt matter to me If you do or not. By the way Hectar, your welcome for the system.
i'm seeing green stars statfox for cards in mlb and this Dunkel Pick: St. Louis (-135);
and in nba green statfox star nuggets and this The Nuggets look to build on their 12-2 ATS record in their last 14 games as an underdog. Denver is the pick (+5 1/2) according to Dunkel, which has the game Even. Dunkel Pick: Denver (+5 1/2).
i'm seeing green stars statfox for cards in mlb and this Dunkel Pick: St. Louis (-135);
and in nba green statfox star nuggets and this The Nuggets look to build on their 12-2 ATS record in their last 14 games as an underdog. Denver is the pick (+5 1/2) according to Dunkel, which has the game Even. Dunkel Pick: Denver (+5 1/2).
yesterday this system (as I interpretted it ) went 2-1 it picked memphis and denver to cover in the nba -- both winners and cards in mlb who lost in the bottom of the ninth
here is what I see today
Dunkel Pick: Cincinnati (-170);
Statfox
Team Pitcher Estimate Edge
PITTSBURGH CORREIA +230
CINCINNATI WOOD -230 @ play is reds
Dunkel Pick: San Francisco (-135)
statfox
Team Pitcher Estimate Edge
SAN FRANCISCO LINCECUM -174 @
COLORADO ROGERS +174 play is giants
looks like Hamp wants to get paid for this - if anyone else sees anything different today please post - its early in the morning and apparently the statfox edges change as the day goes on
yesterday this system (as I interpretted it ) went 2-1 it picked memphis and denver to cover in the nba -- both winners and cards in mlb who lost in the bottom of the ninth
here is what I see today
Dunkel Pick: Cincinnati (-170);
Statfox
Team Pitcher Estimate Edge
PITTSBURGH CORREIA +230
CINCINNATI WOOD -230 @ play is reds
Dunkel Pick: San Francisco (-135)
statfox
Team Pitcher Estimate Edge
SAN FRANCISCO LINCECUM -174 @
COLORADO ROGERS +174 play is giants
looks like Hamp wants to get paid for this - if anyone else sees anything different today please post - its early in the morning and apparently the statfox edges change as the day goes on
yesterday this system (as I interpretted it ) went 2-1 it picked memphis and denver to cover in the nba -- both winners and cards in mlb who lost in the bottom of the ninth
here is what I see today
Dunkel Pick: Cincinnati (-170);
Statfox
Team Pitcher Estimate Edge
PITTSBURGH CORREIA +230
CINCINNATI WOOD -230 @ play is reds
Dunkel Pick: San Francisco (-135)
statfox
Team Pitcher Estimate Edge
SAN FRANCISCO LINCECUM -174 @
COLORADO ROGERS +174 play is giants
looks like Hamp wants to get paid for this - if anyone else sees anything different today please post - its early in the morning and apparently the statfox edges change as the day goes on
yesterday this system (as I interpretted it ) went 2-1 it picked memphis and denver to cover in the nba -- both winners and cards in mlb who lost in the bottom of the ninth
here is what I see today
Dunkel Pick: Cincinnati (-170);
Statfox
Team Pitcher Estimate Edge
PITTSBURGH CORREIA +230
CINCINNATI WOOD -230 @ play is reds
Dunkel Pick: San Francisco (-135)
statfox
Team Pitcher Estimate Edge
SAN FRANCISCO LINCECUM -174 @
COLORADO ROGERS +174 play is giants
looks like Hamp wants to get paid for this - if anyone else sees anything different today please post - its early in the morning and apparently the statfox edges change as the day goes on
well both games were blow outs - system goes 1-1 tonight unfortunately biggest chalk reds lost
I will try to post what I believe the plays to be each day any suggestions are welcome
well both games were blow outs - system goes 1-1 tonight unfortunately biggest chalk reds lost
I will try to post what I believe the plays to be each day any suggestions are welcome
APR 19 -- 2 plays in MLB that both index's agree on
San Diego at Chicago Cubs (8:05 p.m. EST)
Dunkel Ratings: San Diego (Moseley) 15.698; Cubs (Russell) 14.900
Dunkel Line: San Diego by 1; 7
Vegas Line: Chicago Cubs (-120); No Run Total
Dunkel Pick: San Diego (+100); N/A
Statfox gives green star to Padres -- play on San Diego
Pitcher | Estimate | Edge | |||
SAN DIEGO | MOSELEY | -138 | CHICAGO CUBS | RUSSELL | +138 |
Pitcher | Estimate | Edge | |||
SAN DIEGO | MOSELEY | -138 | CHICAGO CUBS | RUSSELL | +138 |
Pitcher | Estimate | Edge | |||
SAN DIEGO | MOSELEY | -138 | CHICAGO CUBS | RUSSELL | +138 |
Game 979-980: Detroit at Seattle (10:10 p.m. EST)
Dunkel Ratings: Detroit (Coke) 15.663; Seattle (Fister) 14.030
Dunkel Line: Detroit by 1 1/2; 7 1/2
Vegas Line: Detroit (-120); 7
Dunkel Pick: Detroit (-120); Over
Statfox gives green star to Tigers - play on Detroit
APR 19 -- 2 plays in MLB that both index's agree on
San Diego at Chicago Cubs (8:05 p.m. EST)
Dunkel Ratings: San Diego (Moseley) 15.698; Cubs (Russell) 14.900
Dunkel Line: San Diego by 1; 7
Vegas Line: Chicago Cubs (-120); No Run Total
Dunkel Pick: San Diego (+100); N/A
Statfox gives green star to Padres -- play on San Diego
Pitcher | Estimate | Edge | |||
SAN DIEGO | MOSELEY | -138 | CHICAGO CUBS | RUSSELL | +138 |
Pitcher | Estimate | Edge | |||
SAN DIEGO | MOSELEY | -138 | CHICAGO CUBS | RUSSELL | +138 |
Pitcher | Estimate | Edge | |||
SAN DIEGO | MOSELEY | -138 | CHICAGO CUBS | RUSSELL | +138 |
Game 979-980: Detroit at Seattle (10:10 p.m. EST)
Dunkel Ratings: Detroit (Coke) 15.663; Seattle (Fister) 14.030
Dunkel Line: Detroit by 1 1/2; 7 1/2
Vegas Line: Detroit (-120); 7
Dunkel Pick: Detroit (-120); Over
Statfox gives green star to Tigers - play on Detroit
It's against the covers rules to ask for money for picks!!!
It's against the covers rules to ask for money for picks!!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.