All Forums | Systems & Strategies

Jeff Sagarin Ratings

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 12379
Posts: 87
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1951
Posted: #76
see a couple: temple, texas tech, tenn, colo st, memphis(again), bowling green, unc
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 815
Posted: #77
i love TEN, just way to many points
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 33972
Posted: #78

Here we go guys!!!!

$$agarins Underdog Game of the Year $$

PITTSBURGH STEELERS  +1       50 unit play  

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1951
Posted: #79
Quote Originally Posted by Wizerguy:

Here we go guys!!!!

$$agarins Underdog Game of the Year $$

PITTSBURGH STEELERS  +1       50 unit play  

 




Huge ratings difference

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 815
Posted: #80
wizer you gonna play the ML to??
 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2001
Posts: 87445
Posted: #81
So how is this doing so far ?  It doesn't look like many picks are being posted.
 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2001
Posts: 87445
Posted: #82
So I'm guessing it's not panning out as expected ?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 790
Posted: #83
Quote Originally Posted by Wizerguy:


Compare these 2 teams Sagarins ratings  and schedule strength and rank  Marshall was a 12pt home dog vs overrated West Virginia

After one game which some may think doesnt mean alot..but does imo, Marshall had a 42 point ( schedule) advantage and #1 Rank .  Even though they lost the game they played WV tough and did cover ATS. Marshalls loss against Ohio St last wk was more impressive numericly than WV home win last wk. Where they ended up on the chart after that first game proves it.So does the outcome of tonights game. They should have beat WV,, they choked, but still won the money


I think because the Head Coach of Marshall was the OC for WV for a number of years was the real reason Mar had a chance to win, 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 33972
Posted: #84

Quote Originally Posted by Lippsman:

So I'm guessing it's not panning out as expected ?
\

Its panning. However, just havent seen to many plays out there this year. I will post them here once I see a play Lipps. Pitt Steelers was a nice play, but the intangable (TO) cost me the game. Had a couple Superior Scheduled Favorites a few weeks back in the NFL. Indy when they played KC and Det. when they played Stl.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 612
Posted: #85
Teasing ECU +8.5 and North Carolina +10
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 33972
Posted: #86

2 plays that fit my system:

2 Team 7 pt TeaserTeaser:

Raiders +12/Clevland +8.5

Flat play on:

Clevland +1.5

 

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2002
Posts: 1705
Posted: #87

Wizer

I think you got to good picks there , I think they both got a shot at winning straight up.

All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.