All Forums | Systems & Strategies

JM Nba System Tracking Various Methods

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 43254
Posts: 402
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 815
Posted: #76
ahh the anti jm system.... sorry for my questions.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 186
Posted: #77
JFISH - those are the Anti-JM (AJM) plays. You just play the opposite of what the JM system would have you play on. Since the AJM lost both A bets of the series, you would then keep betting against those teams until they lose (B or C) a bet.

Smits - okay, I am just trying to be clear here. Please pardon the repetition.
I see a posted record for AJM last year was 80-2.
What I am asking is -
             Is the 80-2 AJM record from simply betting the opposite of what JM would play on for 3 games until a win (without buying pts of course - I get that and thx) against v1 and v2, or is it only against v1?
We both understand what the AJM is...I just want to know what the 80-2 record is from last year...is it against both v1 and v2? or just v1?
thx in advance
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 2387
Posted: #78
Quote Originally Posted by LSU2thBone:

JFISH - those are the Anti-JM (AJM) plays. You just play the opposite of what the JM system would have you play on. Since the AJM lost both A bets of the series, you would then keep betting against those teams until they lose (B or C) a bet.

Smits - okay, I am just trying to be clear here. Please pardon the repetition.
I see a posted record for AJM last year was 80-2.
What I am asking is -
             Is the 80-2 AJM record from simply betting the opposite of what JM would play on for 3 games until a win (without buying pts of course - I get that and thx) against v1 and v2, or is it only against v1?
We both understand what the AJM is...I just want to know what the 80-2 record is from last year...is it against both v1 and v2? or just v1?
thx in advance


80-2 is the combined record for v1 and v2. 
v3 is not included in the 80-2 record (v3 JM was 26-2, AJM v3 was worse).
If you look at last years thread, I denote the plays as JM1 for version 1 and JM2 as version 2, but the 80-2 record is combined.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 1094
Posted: #79

I'm going to do this:

Whenever I lose a JM v4 play (the other thread titled "NHL Road Chase), I'm going to play the Anti-JM wagers, -only if- they are a v1 or v2 play

That way, I won't have to worry about making 2 (A) bets on the same day against each other.  If I keep losing the v4 play, I won't play any anti-JM plays for the series.  If I win the v4 play, I'll start playing the anti-JM (assuming it's v1 or v2)

Sound smart?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 331
Posted: #80
haha you payed for the system ill be here to the end dont worry
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 1094
Posted: #81
Quote Originally Posted by smdio:

I'm going to do this:

Whenever I lose a JM v4 play (the other thread titled "NHL Road Chase), I'm going to play the Anti-JM wagers, -only if- they are a v1 or v2 play

That way, I won't have to worry about making 2 (A) bets on the same day against each other.  If I keep losing the v4 play, I won't play any anti-JM plays for the series.  If I win the v4 play, I'll start playing the anti-JM (assuming it's v1 or v2)

Sound smart?

This should have said "NBA Road Chase"

Sorry, getting systems crossed :/

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 331
Posted: #82
-------------------------------------------------
Anti JM Version 2: Labby

Record: 0-2 
Profit: -$
Risked: $22
ROI: -100%

Line 1) 5-5-5-5-11
Line 1a) 5-5-5-5-11

Line 1)  New Jersey Nets -2.5   -110   $17.60 yo win $16.00
--------------------------------------------------------

Anti JM Version 2: ABC

Record: 0-2
Profit: -$22
Risked: $22
ROI: -100%

B-Bet: New Jersey Nets -2.5 -110  $23.20 to win $21
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 7571
Posted: #83
Quote Originally Posted by pokerpro40k:

-------------------------------------------------
Anti JM Version 2: Labby

Record: 0-2 
Profit: -$
Risked: $22
ROI: -100%

Line 1) 5-5-5-5-11
Line 1a) 5-5-5-5-11

Line 1)  New Jersey Nets -2.5   -110   $17.60 yo win $16.00
--------------------------------------------------------

Anti JM Version 2: ABC

Record: 0-2
Profit: -$22
Risked: $22
ROI: -100%

B-Bet: New Jersey Nets -2.5 -110  $23.20 to win $21
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 186
Posted: #84
Smitler-

I understand the 80-2 record on the JM v1 and v2. Forget about that.

What I want to know is what versions did the AJM GO AGAINST to come up with the 80-2 AJM record for last year?

Respectfully

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 2387
Posted: #85
Quote Originally Posted by pokerpro40k:

-------------------------------------------------
Anti JM Version 2: Labby

Record: 0-2 
Profit: -$
Risked: $22
ROI: -100%

Line 1) 5-5-5-5-11
Line 1a) 5-5-5-5-11

Line 1)  New Jersey Nets -2.5   -110   $17.60 yo win $16.00
--------------------------------------------------------

Anti JM Version 2: ABC

Record: 0-2
Profit: -$22
Risked: $22
ROI: -100%

B-Bet: New Jersey Nets -2.5 -110  $23.20 to win $21


Your individual game record may be 0-2 bit if you are chasing then your record is 0-0 with 2 pending.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 1094
Posted: #86
Quote Originally Posted by LSU2thBone:

Smitler-

I understand the 80-2 record on the JM v1 and v2. Forget about that.

What I want to know is what versions did the AJM GO AGAINST to come up with the 80-2 AJM record for last year?

Respectfully

I think it's against v1 v2 as well, pretty sure I read that somewhere

Anti JM doesn't work for v3 or v4

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 186
Posted: #87
thx smdio

I was hoping whoever tracked it would tell me instead of guessing. 

I know it does NOT work against v3 & v4. I backtested those either yesterday or the day before and they both came to about 75% win.
This is EXACTLY why I want to make sure the 80-2 record that was tracked WAS against v1 & v2. I don't want to assume it was.

Just cannot get a straight definitive answer...

I appreciate tho
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 186
Posted: #88
Maybe it was only against v1?

Who knows?

But I'm trying real hard to find out...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 1094
Posted: #89

I'm sure someone has done it.  Just can't remember where I got it from

I know I haven't, as I've only tracked the system that I'm following in the other thread

But I know it's been tracked.  Keep asking, you'll find the guy that did it

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 2387
Posted: #90
Quote Originally Posted by LSU2thBone:

Smitler-

I understand the 80-2 record on the JM v1 and v2. Forget about that.

What I want to know is what versions did the AJM GO AGAINST to come up with the 80-2 AJM record for last year?

Respectfully



The answer to your question is!!!!!!!!! (drum roll); VERSION 1 AND VERSION 2!!!

If you would take 1 minute to read each page of last years thread (about 20 minutes)  might happen. You might also gain some insight to increase your chances of success this season.
I also plan to re-read the thread for the same purpose, but it will take me longer since my OCD requires that I analyze every damn sentence.

I'm just fuckin with ya LSU2thBone, My intent is not to offend you.
I hope you understand. I will be lurking and hope to contribute by sharing my JM/AJM experiences.


https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=79&sub=100575598&page=1
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 2387
Posted: #91
I am an idiot. That link doesn't work. Its the "Anti-JM NBA thread".
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 815
Posted: #92

so is teh consensus out that Under the ANIT JM SYSTEM, NYJ -2.5 is the play? 

also, is everyone here buying points for all teh systems or are we just playing the spreads outright? thanks alot guys. i really appreciate it

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 815
Posted: #93
we always buy PTS correct?? only time we do not buy points is for the ANTI JM??? thanks
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 186
Posted: #94
Smit-

I take no offense

JFISH
NJ -2.5 IS the correct AJM play tonight. You do not buy points under this system which makes it more inviting to roll Martingale. Jus sayin.

If it were a regular JM play you would buy 3 pts, but it is AJM so you don't.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 815
Posted: #95
Quote Originally Posted by LSU2thBone:

Smit-

I take no offense

JFISH
NJ -2.5 IS the correct AJM play tonight. You do not buy points under this system which makes it more inviting to roll Martingale. Jus sayin.

If it were a regular JM play you would buy 3 pts, but it is AJM so you don't.

 

thanks ALOT lsu,

anti jm was pretty profitable last year???

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 815
Posted: #96

hate to clutter this thread up, but does anyone know how many times the ANTI JM system went to a "C" bet?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 331
Posted: #97
no clue jfish...the records in parenthesis next to the record column is the overall series records so if you look back to the other nights results you will see

Record: 2-0 (2-0)

first is if you had wagered straight....the 2nd in parentheses is the chase record 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 1094
Posted: #98

Sorry guys but the Martingale is really not a good idea to use.  Not for any of JM's systems, in my opinion.  Not even Anti JM

You would make *just as much* profits using an aggressive Labourchere, as well as laying far FAR less per bet. Example?

Your base bet is $50.  You're using Martingale.  This is a JM v1 bet, so you'll be buying points.  You lose your (A) bet, which was $85 to win $50.  Your next bet would have to recover the $85 just lost, plus profit the original $50, so it would have to be $229.50 to win $135.  Let's say you lose.  You're now down $229.50 + $85.  Your next (C) bet would have to recover those losses, plus profit your original $50.  Your (C) bet would have to be $618.80 to win $364.  God forbid you run into one of the losses for the year!  You're now out over $1200 !!

Even if you didn't buy points for the Anti JM, as LSU suggest, your final (C) bet would be $231 to win $210.  Lose that and you're out $441, which is equivilant to almost 9 units.

Labourchere used in the same situation will recover -all- of your losses while laying less than half of the bets for Martingale.  You only have to win 40% of your bets to turn a profit using Labourchere, and both the Anti-JM and JM systems hit far more than that.  By the end of the year, using a Labby for both JM and Anti-JM, you'll end up recovering every bet you ever lost, and profiting about 80-100 units.  Seems far more attractive to me than anything Martingale-related..

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 815
Posted: #99
any plays for 2nite, New jersey hit with AJM last night.... lets get paiiiiiddd
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 288
Posted: #100
Kangaroo or what the user is called backtracked the AJM last season for the season before, and that went even steven as far as I remember.

Just a note for those who might be blinded by the fact that it went without a loss last season.
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.