JM NFL System

1)      BET ID=302370587 

Straight Wager   12/19/09 10:34 ET

bet 50.00 to win 135.00 (paid 185.0) Result: Wager Won

Cowboys(Dallas) 24        12/19/09(20:25 ET) Cowboys(Dallas) +270
Saints(NewOrleans) 17

2)      BET ID=302370586 

Straight Wager  12/19/09 10:34 ET

bet 55.00 to win 50.00 (paid 105.0)  Result: Wager Won

Cowboys(Dallas) 24        12/19/09(20:25 ET) Cowboys(Dallas) +7.5
Saints(NewOrleans) 17

3)      BET ID=302345164 

Straight Wager  12/18/09 22:54 ET

bet 52.50 to win 50.00 (paid 102.5)  Result: Wager Won

Cowboys(Dallas) 24       12/19/09(20:25 ET) Cowboys(Dallas) +7.5
Saints(NewOrleans) 17

Just so everyone knows....JM never sent out an e-mail for any NFL games this week.  I would surmise then that KC is not an official play.  I am staying away, especially after some recent [C] losses in hockey.

Dallas was a nice modified winner, though.  Congrats!  

Same here Nole.

DR D...WRONG!!!!

No C losses in NHL.

You and silanrchy are hacks, probably working for a book, trying to discourge people by introducing the slightest bit of doubt, which is detrimental to the wagering mind.

Quote Originally Posted by on3:

Week 15 modified system play:
Dallas +9

this is the last play of the season for the modified system. you are welcomed to play Kansas City as well if you dont want to apply the filter and actually gamble for a change.

Thanks on3 for the mod and a great season. Great call on DAL.

Nole...Ramper...

The two NHL [C] losses I was referring to were with the Home Chase system posted elsewhere here in Strategies.  Also suffered a [C] loss in the NBA with DET, although JM claims a win.

The modified  AWAY CHASE NHL continues to be perfect and I will continue to play it.

As for this thread with the NFL...JM finally sent an e-mail early this morning stating that while KC met the betting criteria, it was to be played cautiously due to their elimination from the playoffs.  As you now know...it lost...but may still win on a [B] or [C].

I am not negative, nor a hack....just posting to help inform.  Ramper, occasionally you need to take a chill pill. 

DR D...Then be specific just like you did in your reply thats all...

Dont just throw out there "especially after some recent (C) losses in hockey"...was that so hard...

Im stragetically tailing these systems (and fading BL wisely) and have my skeds prepared, but how are you helping inform a newbie for instance with statements like that...

Yeah that was good to stay away from KC (NFL), but the NHL season is still young and it hardly compares to the NFL season as in your example...

and I hope your not playing an NHL home chase system...please dont...

I didnt lose the DET (C)...I know what your referring to and I saw all the controversy...I won it as a (B) on a 3 tm 6 pt tease +11 vs NO on 12/16 with UTA and LAC...Ah see the right way to use these systems rather than to blindly tail the JM system...Its called gambling (for a living), of which is why I live in LV...

hey, I dont want issues with you or silanarchy (who wishes I was a person), but come on man...youve seen that ESPN MNF NFL segement right "cmon man"...

and if your not a hacker or book plant you got to admit there is a ton of shady crap and characters in these forums...just like all over LV...its the same thing to a T... 

anyway G/L to you and all...

and be wise with that NHL home chase...its better to keep an eye on those NHL RD UD's.../r

Quote Originally Posted by MontanaMax:




Yup........Ramper - - ........... - on3
We had a 2 star scumbag play of the week with that one
A JM play
While............
Our boy B Lang tripped and fell on Neo


I hate them boys...........
But couldn't last night - had to hold my nose
Well those Saints fans too
But hey.........
Business is business and money doesn't have a face
Now I can go back and hating on my div foe

Hey MonMax, whats up...

Is BL a work of crap or what...Im busy putting a keen focus on RC's pending NBA action, but I am gonna look at some CBB fades for sure...

looking like gems.../r

Ramper...

Congratulations on not suffering the losses I have with the NBA game and the NHL home chase system.  You are obviously smarter than I am with these systems with your ability to pick the right ones and stay out of trouble.

I didn't feel the need to expound on my NHL losses initially because this is the NFL thread and I just wanted to apprise all of JM's e-mail...or lack thereof...concerning KC...and why I wasn't playing it. That's all.

I have no issues with you, and now, hopefully, you will have none with me.  Please take my posts on face value, and don't try to read anything surreptitious into them.  You'll find I'm a good guy and not a hack or a shill for any book.  The doctor part of my name is legitimate. 

Good luck to you in all your wagering endeavors! 

on3...thanks to you as well...

All the best to all in '10...

If you count the final system play on KC...which may or may not have been played, depending on your taste...the system went 21-0.  One [C] wager win and 4 [B] wager wins (if you include KC).  The rest were all [A] wins.

So a $500 per chase bettor made at least $10,500.

Clearly, the best JM system so far.

no, jm just saying that it's possible to have that many plays. but everyone knows it's very unlikely to happen.