Hey everybody, I’m brand new around here…and am super interested in this particular “One-Good-Three-Point-Play-a Day” system EXACTLY as JonnyMega first configured it, both in ChallengePost (over there it was 24 bets over 30 calendar days, earning 16.12% of startup bank...easily EXCEEDING his very down-to-earth target performance rate—not revealed to us until he moved the system over here--of 10% per calendar month).
Jonny, you’re doing GREAT with this the way it is…you want to dabble with risky ten-bangers go ahead…but don’t abandon this baby (this is the real deal, and appears to have the makings of something quite rare…STAYING POWER COMBINED WITH GOOD PERFORMANCE…in the long run way better than a sexy-slugger that sizzles then disappears (which is what is destined for all “systems” consistently invoking 5%-plus plays)…Please,
just because of a less than inspiring (not cold/just choppy) 7-7 start to it after you re-launched in this thread, PLEASE DON’T ABANDON THIS BABY for something more sexy…here’s why…
If you look at the OVERALL record of your Three-Point “One-A-Day” Play…here’s what we have, once we “splice” it together…remember the 10,000 start in the first post became $11,612.95…just pro-rate bump the $1000 launch-bank in this thread up to that level…and we now have
*a great 38 plays (22-16, or 58%...all with nice odds that hadn’t eroded much at all from even money), placed one a day over 44 calendar days…
*bringing a very nice 16.53% return to our starting bank (the 10k moving to 11,613 over the first “sexy” 15-9 stage at the ChallengePost…but “weathering” the dull 7-7 bit since you relaunched here very nicely…even appreciating a bit to 11,652…
*for an OVERALL PERFORMANCE (10,000 becoming 11,612 in stage 1…then after moving and enduring a 7-7 lull…drifting up to its current true level 11,652) of 16.52% in just 44 days…
*that’s 137.12% p.annum and, more importantly….that’s 11.27% p.month (what u wanted, dude…and who can not want that, too?)
Jonny, whatever you do, please keep the trades (with or without your well-stated rationale) coming but DO NOT CHANGE YOUR SELECTION CRITERIA one iota to adjust to the last two-weeks of “blah” but not bad results…the current selections are just fine…58% winners will come and go in “spells”…the results can’t always be amazing as they were during stage 1 when you first floated this over at the ChallengePost….
Anyhow, my first post has become an impassioned public service plea to not change your 3%-a-day selection mode or system configuration…I’m sure others appreciate it as much as I do, especially now that they see it as 38 plays over 44 days, presented in two stages on two different posts, with performance that exceeds its target. Keep it coming…(I need the plays to dabble with a bit more in a very conservative staking system that may be a perfect match for it...more on that later, if it pans out.)
Glad to be here…and hope I’ve been able to keep Jonny’s “Real Thing” in the market. Don’t suppose anybody here’s old enough to remember when Coca Cola tried to change it’s formula…lol?
Hey everybody, I’m brand new around here…and am super interested in this particular “One-Good-Three-Point-Play-a Day” system EXACTLY as JonnyMega first configured it, both in ChallengePost (over there it was 24 bets over 30 calendar days, earning 16.12% of startup bank...easily EXCEEDING his very down-to-earth target performance rate—not revealed to us until he moved the system over here--of 10% per calendar month).
Jonny, you’re doing GREAT with this the way it is…you want to dabble with risky ten-bangers go ahead…but don’t abandon this baby (this is the real deal, and appears to have the makings of something quite rare…STAYING POWER COMBINED WITH GOOD PERFORMANCE…in the long run way better than a sexy-slugger that sizzles then disappears (which is what is destined for all “systems” consistently invoking 5%-plus plays)…Please,
just because of a less than inspiring (not cold/just choppy) 7-7 start to it after you re-launched in this thread, PLEASE DON’T ABANDON THIS BABY for something more sexy…here’s why…
If you look at the OVERALL record of your Three-Point “One-A-Day” Play…here’s what we have, once we “splice” it together…remember the 10,000 start in the first post became $11,612.95…just pro-rate bump the $1000 launch-bank in this thread up to that level…and we now have
*a great 38 plays (22-16, or 58%...all with nice odds that hadn’t eroded much at all from even money), placed one a day over 44 calendar days…
*bringing a very nice 16.53% return to our starting bank (the 10k moving to 11,613 over the first “sexy” 15-9 stage at the ChallengePost…but “weathering” the dull 7-7 bit since you relaunched here very nicely…even appreciating a bit to 11,652…
*for an OVERALL PERFORMANCE (10,000 becoming 11,612 in stage 1…then after moving and enduring a 7-7 lull…drifting up to its current true level 11,652) of 16.52% in just 44 days…
*that’s 137.12% p.annum and, more importantly….that’s 11.27% p.month (what u wanted, dude…and who can not want that, too?)
Jonny, whatever you do, please keep the trades (with or without your well-stated rationale) coming but DO NOT CHANGE YOUR SELECTION CRITERIA one iota to adjust to the last two-weeks of “blah” but not bad results…the current selections are just fine…58% winners will come and go in “spells”…the results can’t always be amazing as they were during stage 1 when you first floated this over at the ChallengePost….
Anyhow, my first post has become an impassioned public service plea to not change your 3%-a-day selection mode or system configuration…I’m sure others appreciate it as much as I do, especially now that they see it as 38 plays over 44 days, presented in two stages on two different posts, with performance that exceeds its target. Keep it coming…(I need the plays to dabble with a bit more in a very conservative staking system that may be a perfect match for it...more on that later, if it pans out.)
Glad to be here…and hope I’ve been able to keep Jonny’s “Real Thing” in the market. Don’t suppose anybody here’s old enough to remember when Coca Cola tried to change it’s formula…lol?
Can't argue with a Devils/Rangers Under play ever.. but do you take into consideration more recent numbers than say, just season totals? The Devils have been playing much better of late and as a result are scoring 2.9 goals/game over their last 20 (2.8 over last 10) and the Rangers are scoring 2.6 over the past 10.
Does this come into play for your analysis?
Keep up the good work
Can't argue with a Devils/Rangers Under play ever.. but do you take into consideration more recent numbers than say, just season totals? The Devils have been playing much better of late and as a result are scoring 2.9 goals/game over their last 20 (2.8 over last 10) and the Rangers are scoring 2.6 over the past 10.
Does this come into play for your analysis?
Keep up the good work
I think this fits in more as a play because of the line we're given.
If this line was -110 for the Under 5 it would be unlikely to qualify as a play. I'll often play a line like this just based on the value. Historical trends point to an Under here, even tho recent game play dictates an Over 5. At plus money, it creates the value needed where if you made this wager 100 times you know you would finish ahead.
Under 5, +103
I think this fits in more as a play because of the line we're given.
If this line was -110 for the Under 5 it would be unlikely to qualify as a play. I'll often play a line like this just based on the value. Historical trends point to an Under here, even tho recent game play dictates an Over 5. At plus money, it creates the value needed where if you made this wager 100 times you know you would finish ahead.
Under 5, +103
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.