So both pitchers need to have over 4.00 ERA for SEASON? Also, 8.00 ERA combined for SEASON and 7.60 ERA for CAREER?
Because todays Angels/Indians would of qualified for 8.00 era and 7.60 career ERA's. Santana's under 4.00 was the reason for no play, correct?
Thanks for sorting this out.
So both pitchers need to have over 4.00 ERA for SEASON? Also, 8.00 ERA combined for SEASON and 7.60 ERA for CAREER?
Because todays Angels/Indians would of qualified for 8.00 era and 7.60 career ERA's. Santana's under 4.00 was the reason for no play, correct?
Thanks for sorting this out.
So both pitchers need to have over 4.00 ERA for SEASON? Also, 8.00 ERA combined for SEASON and 7.60 ERA for CAREER?
Because todays Angels/Indians would of qualified for 8.00 era and 7.60 career ERA's. Santana's under 4.00 was the reason for no play, correct?
Thanks for sorting this out.
So both pitchers need to have over 4.00 ERA for SEASON? Also, 8.00 ERA combined for SEASON and 7.60 ERA for CAREER?
Because todays Angels/Indians would of qualified for 8.00 era and 7.60 career ERA's. Santana's under 4.00 was the reason for no play, correct?
Thanks for sorting this out.
Kansas City/Cleveland only has a .930 winning percentage. Is this just a case of altering the numbers (not going by the .950 pct) because you like the game and it's close to the filters?
Are there other details to the systems than the parameters you told us? I thought you were going to PM me with the details. I understand if you don't want to, but just come out and tell a guy.
Your system is running awesome and I'm not complaining so I don't want to sound like I am. I'm just trying to understand completely so I can look at the slate every day and pick the games out myself rather than wait for your post. Much appreciated.
Kansas City/Cleveland only has a .930 winning percentage. Is this just a case of altering the numbers (not going by the .950 pct) because you like the game and it's close to the filters?
Are there other details to the systems than the parameters you told us? I thought you were going to PM me with the details. I understand if you don't want to, but just come out and tell a guy.
Your system is running awesome and I'm not complaining so I don't want to sound like I am. I'm just trying to understand completely so I can look at the slate every day and pick the games out myself rather than wait for your post. Much appreciated.
Kansas City/Cleveland only has a .930 winning percentage. Is this just a case of altering the numbers (not going by the .950 pct) because you like the game and it's close to the filters?
Are there other details to the systems than the parameters you told us? I thought you were going to PM me with the details. I understand if you don't want to, but just come out and tell a guy.
Your system is running awesome and I'm not complaining so I don't want to sound like I am. I'm just trying to understand completely so I can look at the slate every day and pick the games out myself rather than wait for your post. Much appreciated.
Kansas City/Cleveland only has a .930 winning percentage. Is this just a case of altering the numbers (not going by the .950 pct) because you like the game and it's close to the filters?
Are there other details to the systems than the parameters you told us? I thought you were going to PM me with the details. I understand if you don't want to, but just come out and tell a guy.
Your system is running awesome and I'm not complaining so I don't want to sound like I am. I'm just trying to understand completely so I can look at the slate every day and pick the games out myself rather than wait for your post. Much appreciated.
Ok then, keep on rolling. Basicly, if its CLOSE give it the 10-4 go ahead
Ok then, keep on rolling. Basicly, if its CLOSE give it the 10-4 go ahead
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.