All Forums | Systems & Strategies

MLB Over's System

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 21914
Posts: 225
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 477
Posted: #26
great work. why u dont today's plays?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 1687
Posted: #27
TUESDAY MLB Over's System
1. Baltimore at Toronto Over 8.5
2. Chi. Cubs at Milwaukee Over 8.5
3. Kansas City at Boston Over 10.5
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 477
Posted: #28
Thanks Gilmar. Good luck!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 1687
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by JoshLewis:

Thanks Gilmar. Good luck!
Your Welcome
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 1
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by Gilmar406:

TUESDAY MLB Over's System
1. Baltimore at Toronto Over 8.5
2. Chi. Cubs at Milwaukee Over 8.5
3. Kansas City at Boston Over 10.5


Hey Gilmar, you have a interesting system but how did Bal and Chc qualify? The combined winning percentages for both games was not over .95. The Hou over yesterday did not meet the same requirement.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 1687
Posted: #31
The winning percentage depends on how big the opposite team has the winning percentage. if th oposite has a big diference between them it can be a official play.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 1687
Posted: #32

  YTD:18-7  
TUESDAY MLB Over's System
1. Baltimore at Toronto Over 8.5 Win
2. Chi. Cubs at Milwaukee Over 8.5 Lose(Sorry guys i dont know how they couldnt score more Runs, when they got 5 RUNS IN THE FIRST Inning Im so sorry guys these game was a Easy Over... SORRY GUYS IT WOULD NOT HAppend again...)
3. Kansas City at Boston Over 10.5 Win


SORRY GUYS!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 477
Posted: #33
sorry? u kidding me? 2-1 is a great night bud, thanks for the winners!


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 1687
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by JoshLewis:

sorry? u kidding me? 2-1 is a great night bud, thanks for the winners!


Im so sorry because it was a 100% winner since the first innning and then everything went down it could it been a excellent day for us...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 1687
Posted: #35
WEDNESDAY MLB Over's System

1. Seattle at NY Yankees Over 8.5
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 477
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by Gilmar406:

Im so sorry because it was a 100% winner since the first innning and then everything went down it could it been a excellent day for us...

Oh yeah, i saw 3-2 score in 1st inning and went to bed. When i saw game ended 3-2, i was shocked, lol. what a joke.

but no need to be sorry, its not your fault. its all brewers&cubs batters fault. they cant hit a sh*t, lol.

good luck today! this pick looks like a winner too. hughes is a gas can this year. its only play or is there any other qualifiers? 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 8
Posted: #37
only one pick today?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 1687
Posted: #38
I think this the only play for the day i will have to take a closer look at the other games to see if there is another play.. GL guys
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 477
Posted: #39
Thanks Gilmar. Good job dude! 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 1456
Posted: #40
"1.Pitchers must have a 4.00 Era or more in his career and 8.00 Era or more together."
 
 
Just wondering if you mean for SEASON and not CAREER?  If it is career than Seattle/NY Yankees wouldn't be a play as they have 7.77 combined era's coming in (Felix a 3.23 career ERA).
 
 
Also when you say .800 runs/game does that mean over 8 RUNS/GAME? 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 44
Posted: #41
[Quote: Originally Posted by Gilmar406]
3.Both teams need to have RA .700 or more togeher as teams.
4.Both tams need to have RS .800 Or more together as teams.[/Qote]
 
What does this calculation refer to? (.700 R/Allowed and .800 R/Scored)  70% of what?........ How do you calculate this factor?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 1687
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by Alldaygambler28:

"1.Pitchers must have a 4.00 Era or more in his career and 8.00 Era or more together."
 
 
Just wondering if you mean for SEASON and not CAREER?  If it is career than Seattle/NY Yankees wouldn't be a play as they have 7.77 combined era's coming in (Felix a 3.23 career ERA).
 
 
Also when you say .800 runs/game does that mean over 8 RUNS/GAME? 

You know what you are right yankees was not an official play, it needs to be 8.00 era or more and they had 7.77 Im so sorry if you guys bet on this game, next time i need to check the games right after posting this....
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 1687
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by ScreaminPain:

Quote Originally Posted by Gilmar406:

3.Both teams need to have RA .700 or more togeher as teams.
4.Both tams need to have RS .800 Or more together as teams.[/Qote]
 
What does this calculation refer to? (.700 R/Allowed and .800 R/Scored)  70% of what?........ How do you calculate this factor?
you add The RA. of both teams to get .700 or more and the same for RS.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 1687
Posted: #44
Guys Todays was a offcial play because before the game they had 10.76 Era adding both pitchers so it was an oficcial play.......
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 1456
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by Gilmar406:

you add The RA. of both teams to get .700 or more and the same for RS.

When I see runs against for each team I see 3.85 for the Yankees and 3.84 for Seattle.  How does that equal .700? 

 

Can you show an example?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 1456
Posted: #46

Quote Originally Posted by Gilmar406:

Guys Todays was a offcial play because before the game they had 10.76 Era adding both pitchers so it was an oficcial play.......

 

Can you clarify this?  Where are you getting 10.76?  We already said it was 7.77 combined ERA.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 1687
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by Alldaygambler28:

When I see runs against for each team I see 3.85 for the Yankees and 3.84 for Seattle.  How does that equal .700? 

 

Can you show an example?

CLick to see the Image
Click on the link and you will see an example..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 1687
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by Alldaygambler28:

 

Can you clarify this?  Where are you getting 10.76?  We already said it was 7.77 combined ERA.

If both pitchers had more than 8 before the game starts and more than 7.60 on there whole career it would be an official play plus the RA. and the RS.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 1456
Posted: #49

I'm sorry, I'm just not getting you at all with the criteria you have given. 

According to your criteria both pitchers need above 8.00 ERA for CAREER.  It was 7.77.  Where are you getting 10.76 and now you are saying more than 7.6?  I thought it was more than 8.00 combined ERAs? 

Also, that link you provided just has their total runs scored for year.  Can you explain how you derive more than .700 from that? 

I also went through the Tigers/Angels and they should of been a play according to your criteria.  Do you just pick and choose your games that qualify or are you suppose to play all of them? 

I understand if you don't want to give your system up, but people in this section expect to be able to know it.  What you provided as the system details isn't accurate.  I'm not trying to sound like a dick I would just like to find the plays myself rather than have to wait for a guy to post on here. 

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 1687
Posted: #50
Quote Originally Posted by Alldaygambler28:

I'm sorry, I'm just not getting you at all with the criteria you have given. 

According to your criteria both pitchers need above 8.00 ERA for CAREER.  It was 7.77.  Where are you getting 10.76 and now you are saying more than 7.6?  I thought it was more than 8.00 combined ERAs? 

Also, that link you provided just has their total runs scored for year.  Can you explain how you derive more than .700 from that? 

I also went through the Tigers/Angels and they should of been a play according to your criteria.  Do you just pick and choose your games that qualify or are you suppose to play all of them? 

I understand if you don't want to give your system up, but people in this section expect to be able to know it.  What you provided as the system details isn't accurate.  I'm not trying to sound like a dick I would just like to find the plays myself rather than have to wait for a guy to post on here. 

I will write something out to explain you everything and hope you can understand...
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.