Really unhappy with this weekend. Looks to be a ery bad start. Yet - should work out long-time but I hate this. Oakland again back, Rays just lost their first series of the year. In a sweep...
0
Really unhappy with this weekend. Looks to be a ery bad start. Yet - should work out long-time but I hate this. Oakland again back, Rays just lost their first series of the year. In a sweep...
Really unhappy with this weekend. Looks to be a ery bad start. Yet - should work out long-time but I hate this. Oakland again back, Rays just lost their first series of the year. In a sweep...
I hear ya... I got burnt last week by dodgers and brewers... I suggest, less series... and really put thought into it, possibly taking 4 game series and home team but not a mass favorite... just my opinion... also even trying over unders... but as I said I lost 2 sweeps already so I am climbing out of a hole
0
Quote Originally Posted by Thasian:
Really unhappy with this weekend. Looks to be a ery bad start. Yet - should work out long-time but I hate this. Oakland again back, Rays just lost their first series of the year. In a sweep...
I hear ya... I got burnt last week by dodgers and brewers... I suggest, less series... and really put thought into it, possibly taking 4 game series and home team but not a mass favorite... just my opinion... also even trying over unders... but as I said I lost 2 sweeps already so I am climbing out of a hole
Really unhappy with this weekend. Looks to be a ery bad start. Yet - should work out long-time but I hate this. Oakland again back, Rays just lost their first series of the year. In a sweep...
I hear ya... I got burnt last week by dodgers and brewers... I suggest, less series... and really put thought into it, possibly taking 4 game series and home team but not a mass favorite... just my opinion... also even trying over unders... but as I said I lost 2 sweeps already so I am climbing out of a hole
Thanks for the feedback yanks and BOL at your climb ;)
As written above, I was very succesful with my series picking-approach in the past. And am not willing o change the system just because of two early losses.. some losses WILL appear, just hoped they would pop up significantly later..
0
Quote Originally Posted by yanks21x:
Quote Originally Posted by Thasian:
Really unhappy with this weekend. Looks to be a ery bad start. Yet - should work out long-time but I hate this. Oakland again back, Rays just lost their first series of the year. In a sweep...
I hear ya... I got burnt last week by dodgers and brewers... I suggest, less series... and really put thought into it, possibly taking 4 game series and home team but not a mass favorite... just my opinion... also even trying over unders... but as I said I lost 2 sweeps already so I am climbing out of a hole
Thanks for the feedback yanks and BOL at your climb ;)
As written above, I was very succesful with my series picking-approach in the past. And am not willing o change the system just because of two early losses.. some losses WILL appear, just hoped they would pop up significantly later..
So I realized, if you bet 1.1 to win 1... game 2 bet, isn't it to win 1 + 1.1? You seem to be adding the bet plus win amount potential plus anot her unit?
0
So I realized, if you bet 1.1 to win 1... game 2 bet, isn't it to win 1 + 1.1? You seem to be adding the bet plus win amount potential plus anot her unit?
So I realized, if you bet 1.1 to win 1... game 2 bet, isn't it to win 1 + 1.1? You seem to be adding the bet plus win amount potential plus anot her unit?
I add one unit "to win" per Game. Rewarding me for the extra work, so to say, and aiming for 1 unit per game.
Quick example, all bets at 2.0 / +100 :
A-Game: Risk 1.00 to win 1.00 (my one unit, I want to have)
B-Game: Risk 3.00 to win 3.00 (1 unit loss recovery, 1 unit "to win" from the A-Game, 1 extra unit since its B-Game)
C-Game: Risk 7.00 to win 7.00; 1+3=4 units loss recovery, 1 unit each for A,B,C [third stage, so i want 3 units]
D-Game: Risk 15.00 to win 15.00; 1+3+7=11 units loss recovery, 1 unit each for A,B,C,D [fourth stage, so i want 4 units]
0
Quote Originally Posted by yanks21x:
So I realized, if you bet 1.1 to win 1... game 2 bet, isn't it to win 1 + 1.1? You seem to be adding the bet plus win amount potential plus anot her unit?
I add one unit "to win" per Game. Rewarding me for the extra work, so to say, and aiming for 1 unit per game.
Quick example, all bets at 2.0 / +100 :
A-Game: Risk 1.00 to win 1.00 (my one unit, I want to have)
B-Game: Risk 3.00 to win 3.00 (1 unit loss recovery, 1 unit "to win" from the A-Game, 1 extra unit since its B-Game)
C-Game: Risk 7.00 to win 7.00; 1+3=4 units loss recovery, 1 unit each for A,B,C [third stage, so i want 3 units]
D-Game: Risk 15.00 to win 15.00; 1+3+7=11 units loss recovery, 1 unit each for A,B,C,D [fourth stage, so i want 4 units]
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.