Why am I trying for unders lol? I just want winners lol... trying to force plays trying to win back 1400 quickly to try to win something this season lol... so angels scoring now damn. They got the both games vs dodgers and now first with rays... dbacks are rolling...not sure what about Colorado equals a lot of runs, the weather winds and altitude or w.e mountain stuff... I guess
0
Why am I trying for unders lol? I just want winners lol... trying to force plays trying to win back 1400 quickly to try to win something this season lol... so angels scoring now damn. They got the both games vs dodgers and now first with rays... dbacks are rolling...not sure what about Colorado equals a lot of runs, the weather winds and altitude or w.e mountain stuff... I guess
not sure why i even ask but just wondering your opinion...
chasing can get scary real quick... and i find myself just jumping off if i am already up for the week... too scared to take that one big loss to wipe out a lot of wins...
0
astros reds under series?
nats phillies over series?
mets braves over series?
cardinals marlins under series?
not sure why i even ask but just wondering your opinion...
chasing can get scary real quick... and i find myself just jumping off if i am already up for the week... too scared to take that one big loss to wipe out a lot of wins...
astros reds under series? nats phillies over series? mets braves over series? cardinals marlins under series? not sure why i even ask but just wondering your opinion... chasing can get scary real quick... and i find myself just jumping off if i am already up for the week... too scared to take that one big loss to wipe out a lot of wins...
Haha. Looking for some action despite my failings? :)
I got:
Astros @Red Under - basically, due to solid pitching on both sides, but a very bad ranking for CIN-Offense. Houston also stronger on the defensive end. You got that too, out of your gut feeling, so this could work out.
Giants @Dodgers Under; Giants offense sucks. Dodgers Offense is solid but nothing more.
Marlins @Cardinals Under: Here we agree Marlins offense sucks, STL is just average in my rating defensively (and with the bat too - which should be ok to handle for MIA-Pitching) but good enough to play strong against the Marlins.
Red Sox @Twins Over: Both solid on defense, but offense is above averange for both and that could / should add up for high scoring games.
Royals @Mariners Over: Royals below average on both sides of the ball, but offense is a tick stronger. Mariners WAY better with the ball as with pitching.
Regarding the two questions open:
Nats v Phillies: Both average on both sides. Nats on both sides a little above, Phillies below. I don't think that the Nats-Pitching will falter and their down Offense should be better as the Phillies-Pitching but not by a broad margin. I wouldn't touch this series.
Braves v Mets: Mets are nearly total average, Braves are better on offense than on defense. So the trend is okay. Summed up, I got powerranking of +5 on offense, +2 on Defense and I need difference of 5 to make a call. Anyhow: No clear Veto, BOL if you go for it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by yanks21x:
astros reds under series? nats phillies over series? mets braves over series? cardinals marlins under series? not sure why i even ask but just wondering your opinion... chasing can get scary real quick... and i find myself just jumping off if i am already up for the week... too scared to take that one big loss to wipe out a lot of wins...
Haha. Looking for some action despite my failings? :)
I got:
Astros @Red Under - basically, due to solid pitching on both sides, but a very bad ranking for CIN-Offense. Houston also stronger on the defensive end. You got that too, out of your gut feeling, so this could work out.
Giants @Dodgers Under; Giants offense sucks. Dodgers Offense is solid but nothing more.
Marlins @Cardinals Under: Here we agree Marlins offense sucks, STL is just average in my rating defensively (and with the bat too - which should be ok to handle for MIA-Pitching) but good enough to play strong against the Marlins.
Red Sox @Twins Over: Both solid on defense, but offense is above averange for both and that could / should add up for high scoring games.
Royals @Mariners Over: Royals below average on both sides of the ball, but offense is a tick stronger. Mariners WAY better with the ball as with pitching.
Regarding the two questions open:
Nats v Phillies: Both average on both sides. Nats on both sides a little above, Phillies below. I don't think that the Nats-Pitching will falter and their down Offense should be better as the Phillies-Pitching but not by a broad margin. I wouldn't touch this series.
Braves v Mets: Mets are nearly total average, Braves are better on offense than on defense. So the trend is okay. Summed up, I got powerranking of +5 on offense, +2 on Defense and I need difference of 5 to make a call. Anyhow: No clear Veto, BOL if you go for it.
am such a degenerate... but i thank you for this... hoping you have an awesome season and help me finish in the green... and i will definitely offer to paypal you something...
the totals are tempting. it seems like it could work but also may not... it just gets boring sometimes when no action lmao...
ummmm your lines are normally much better, i don't know if you realize but you got some really bad lines today... like very bad
0
am such a degenerate... but i thank you for this... hoping you have an awesome season and help me finish in the green... and i will definitely offer to paypal you something...
the totals are tempting. it seems like it could work but also may not... it just gets boring sometimes when no action lmao...
ummmm your lines are normally much better, i don't know if you realize but you got some really bad lines today... like very bad
as i say i can't imagine betting an over under 8... so honestly i may just skip it, but i must say yankees are an over team and their pitching is nothing special...
0
as i say i can't imagine betting an over under 8... so honestly i may just skip it, but i must say yankees are an over team and their pitching is nothing special...
Had a spontaneous bookiechange today, since I was excluded by my old one. Still waiting for reasons, they simply paid all my money out and thats it.
New one applies the german gambling tax in combination with bad odds. Yet, I wanted to post something here. Looking for a mid- and longterm solution right now, but this was the quickest to be able to post something and stay in the game.
0
Had a spontaneous bookiechange today, since I was excluded by my old one. Still waiting for reasons, they simply paid all my money out and thats it.
New one applies the german gambling tax in combination with bad odds. Yet, I wanted to post something here. Looking for a mid- and longterm solution right now, but this was the quickest to be able to post something and stay in the game.
damn but I didn't go for it... so up in the air with this... if too many go deep into series I would not be fully able to chase. I only am betting 25 as a unit with 1k as balance
0
astros reds under series? winner
nats phillies over series? postponed
mets braves over series? winner
cardinals marlins under series? winner
damn but I didn't go for it... so up in the air with this... if too many go deep into series I would not be fully able to chase. I only am betting 25 as a unit with 1k as balance
Just for your info: I just run a check on just playing A&B-Bets: +23.78 so far..
Hm. I have to check again. I got too many losses in their in my count.
Having 112 winning bets in my quick and dirty sheet is okay, seeing that I should have 84+27=111. In the end, it's just to get an idea.
But 27 (Losing A-Bets)+14+9 = 50 doesn't add up with the 78 Losing results I got. So.. I will run it again, with a little more time, but shouldn't get worse
0
Quote Originally Posted by Thasian:
Just for your info: I just run a check on just playing A&B-Bets: +23.78 so far..
Hm. I have to check again. I got too many losses in their in my count.
Having 112 winning bets in my quick and dirty sheet is okay, seeing that I should have 84+27=111. In the end, it's just to get an idea.
But 27 (Losing A-Bets)+14+9 = 50 doesn't add up with the 78 Losing results I got. So.. I will run it again, with a little more time, but shouldn't get worse
I lost 55 A-Bets (27+14+9 + some open), and 23 B-Bets. So it adds up.
A-Bets are 84-55 +10.76
B-Bets are just 27-23 +0.76
C-Bets are 14-9 +35.48
D-Bets 0-2 -37.15, so lets forget them REALLY quick ;)
Ttoals +9.85, so some difference to the 10.37 I got here, but at the moment I'm not motivated to search for the mistake :) Seems like one game I got in another way here, probably an A-Bet Dog that lost.
On the other hand: Let now a couple of those win, and we are good.
0
My mistake.
I lost 55 A-Bets (27+14+9 + some open), and 23 B-Bets. So it adds up.
A-Bets are 84-55 +10.76
B-Bets are just 27-23 +0.76
C-Bets are 14-9 +35.48
D-Bets 0-2 -37.15, so lets forget them REALLY quick ;)
Ttoals +9.85, so some difference to the 10.37 I got here, but at the moment I'm not motivated to search for the mistake :) Seems like one game I got in another way here, probably an A-Bet Dog that lost.
On the other hand: Let now a couple of those win, and we are good.
Copyright � 1995 - 2024
CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.