I have to admit I am curious about this system. It seems so simple.
It is very mechanical and straight forward. Re read post # 3 for the answer to your second question.
A.R.
It is very mechanical and straight forward. Re read post # 3 for the answer to your second question.
A.R.
It is very mechanical and straight forward. Re read post # 3 for the answer to your second question.
A.R.
Please remember that each series cleared will net us 1 unit in profit. We have no way in knowing how many levels it will take to clear each series.
Plays for Saturday May 02 :
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Chicago Cubs 1 < Milwaukee > 6
@ - 173
( A ) : New York Mets 0 < Washington > 1
@ + 117
( A ) : L.A. Dodgers 6 < Arizona > 4
@ - 150
( A ) : Minnesota 5 < Chicago White Sox > 3
@ - 108
( A ) : Tampa Bay 0 < Baltimore > 4
Series net unit record for May : 2 - 0
( A ) : 2 - 3
( B ) : 0 - 0
( C ) : 0 - 0
( D ) : 0 - 0
( E ) : 0 - 0
( F ) : 0 - 0
Please remember that each series cleared will net us 1 unit in profit. We have no way in knowing how many levels it will take to clear each series.
Plays for Saturday May 02 :
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Chicago Cubs 1 < Milwaukee > 6
@ - 173
( A ) : New York Mets 0 < Washington > 1
@ + 117
( A ) : L.A. Dodgers 6 < Arizona > 4
@ - 150
( A ) : Minnesota 5 < Chicago White Sox > 3
@ - 108
( A ) : Tampa Bay 0 < Baltimore > 4
Series net unit record for May : 2 - 0
( A ) : 2 - 3
( B ) : 0 - 0
( C ) : 0 - 0
( D ) : 0 - 0
( E ) : 0 - 0
( F ) : 0 - 0
Plays for Sunday May 03 :
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Miami < Philadelphia >
( A ) : New York Mets < Washington >
vs.
( B ) : Washington < N.Y.Mets >
( A ) : Tampa Bay < Baltimore >
vs.
( B ) : Baltimore < Tampa Bay >
( B ) : Milwaukee < Chicago Cubs >
C ya in the winners circle
A.R.
Plays for Sunday May 03 :
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Miami < Philadelphia >
( A ) : New York Mets < Washington >
vs.
( B ) : Washington < N.Y.Mets >
( A ) : Tampa Bay < Baltimore >
vs.
( B ) : Baltimore < Tampa Bay >
( B ) : Milwaukee < Chicago Cubs >
C ya in the winners circle
A.R.
I'm sorry for the mistake filled card I posted earlier this morning. A lack of sleep makes you see things that aren't really there. Here is the updated card for today.
Plays for Sunday May 03 :
vs.
( B ) : New York Mets < Washington >
( A ) : Baltimore < Tampa Bay >
vs.
( B ) : Tampa Bay < Baltimore >
( B ) : Chicago Cubs < Milwaukee >
C ya in the winners circle
A.R.
I'm sorry for the mistake filled card I posted earlier this morning. A lack of sleep makes you see things that aren't really there. Here is the updated card for today.
Plays for Sunday May 03 :
vs.
( B ) : New York Mets < Washington >
( A ) : Baltimore < Tampa Bay >
vs.
( B ) : Tampa Bay < Baltimore >
( B ) : Chicago Cubs < Milwaukee >
C ya in the winners circle
A.R.
Any of the 30 MLB teams can qualify as a " bet against " whenever they are shutout. We then begin our 6 game chase against that team on their very next outing. It doesn't matter who they will play in the very next game ( we will bet against them ). And yes, a small % of the time you will be betting both sides. Just try and get as good odds on both sides if you can.
As an example ; on May 2nd we had an ( A ) wager against the Washington Nationals and we were hoping that the N.Y.Mets would get the win. The Nationals won the game which now means we take the N.Y.Mets to a ( B ) wager against the Nationals. Now in the very same game, the N.Y.Mets ( qualified ) for the system by being shutout. We now start a series against the Mets in the very next game and that means that Washington is now an ( A ) wager over the N.Y.Mets. What this all means is that one series will end with a 1 unit win and the other side will continue to be bet again on Monday.
The veterans who followed last year's thread know that's how the system works. You're not looking to " middle " the game. You want each qualifying team to complete its own series with a plus one unit win.
A.R.
Any of the 30 MLB teams can qualify as a " bet against " whenever they are shutout. We then begin our 6 game chase against that team on their very next outing. It doesn't matter who they will play in the very next game ( we will bet against them ). And yes, a small % of the time you will be betting both sides. Just try and get as good odds on both sides if you can.
As an example ; on May 2nd we had an ( A ) wager against the Washington Nationals and we were hoping that the N.Y.Mets would get the win. The Nationals won the game which now means we take the N.Y.Mets to a ( B ) wager against the Nationals. Now in the very same game, the N.Y.Mets ( qualified ) for the system by being shutout. We now start a series against the Mets in the very next game and that means that Washington is now an ( A ) wager over the N.Y.Mets. What this all means is that one series will end with a 1 unit win and the other side will continue to be bet again on Monday.
The veterans who followed last year's thread know that's how the system works. You're not looking to " middle " the game. You want each qualifying team to complete its own series with a plus one unit win.
A.R.
Any of the 30 MLB teams can qualify as a " bet against " whenever they are shutout. We then begin our 6 game chase against that team on their very next outing. It doesn't matter who they will play in the very next game ( we will bet against them ). And yes, a small % of the time you will be betting both sides. Just try and get as good odds on both sides if you can.
As an example ; on May 2nd we had an ( A ) wager against the Washington Nationals and we were hoping that the N.Y.Mets would get the win. The Nationals won the game which now means we take the N.Y.Mets to a ( B ) wager against the Nationals. Now in the very same game, the N.Y.Mets ( qualified ) for the system by being shutout. We now start a series against the Mets in the very next game and that means that Washington is now an ( A ) wager over the N.Y.Mets. What this all means is that one series will end with a 1 unit win and the other side will continue to be bet again on Monday.
The veterans who followed last year's thread know that's how the system works. You're not looking to " middle " the game. You want each qualifying team to complete its own series with a plus one unit win.
A.R.
Interesting. Thank you for the explanation A.R.
Any of the 30 MLB teams can qualify as a " bet against " whenever they are shutout. We then begin our 6 game chase against that team on their very next outing. It doesn't matter who they will play in the very next game ( we will bet against them ). And yes, a small % of the time you will be betting both sides. Just try and get as good odds on both sides if you can.
As an example ; on May 2nd we had an ( A ) wager against the Washington Nationals and we were hoping that the N.Y.Mets would get the win. The Nationals won the game which now means we take the N.Y.Mets to a ( B ) wager against the Nationals. Now in the very same game, the N.Y.Mets ( qualified ) for the system by being shutout. We now start a series against the Mets in the very next game and that means that Washington is now an ( A ) wager over the N.Y.Mets. What this all means is that one series will end with a 1 unit win and the other side will continue to be bet again on Monday.
The veterans who followed last year's thread know that's how the system works. You're not looking to " middle " the game. You want each qualifying team to complete its own series with a plus one unit win.
A.R.
Interesting. Thank you for the explanation A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Miami 2 < Philadelphia > 6
@ - 173
( A ) : Washington 1 < N.Y.Mets > 0
@ EV
vs.
( B ) : New York Mets 0 < Washington > 1
@ - 102
( A ) : Baltimore 4 < Tampa Bay > 2
@ - 107
vs.
( B ) : Tampa Bay 2 < Baltimore > 4
@ + 105
( B ) : Chicago Cubs 3 < Milwaukee > 5
@ - 142
Series net unit record for May : 4 - 0
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Miami 2 < Philadelphia > 6
@ - 173
( A ) : Washington 1 < N.Y.Mets > 0
@ EV
vs.
( B ) : New York Mets 0 < Washington > 1
@ - 102
( A ) : Baltimore 4 < Tampa Bay > 2
@ - 107
vs.
( B ) : Tampa Bay 2 < Baltimore > 4
@ + 105
( B ) : Chicago Cubs 3 < Milwaukee > 5
@ - 142
Series net unit record for May : 4 - 0
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Seattle < L.A.Angels >
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona >
( B ) : Atlanta < Philadelphia >
( C ) : Miami < Washington >
( C ) : L.A. Dodgers < Milwaukee >
C ya in the winners circle
A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Seattle < L.A.Angels >
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona >
( B ) : Atlanta < Philadelphia >
( C ) : Miami < Washington >
( C ) : L.A. Dodgers < Milwaukee >
C ya in the winners circle
A.R.
Very cool of you to answer, Ghost
Very cool of you to answer, Ghost
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.