[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Seattle 3 < L.A.Angels > 2
@ - 133
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona > PPD.
( B ) : Atlanta 2 < Philadelphia > 5
@ - 146
( C ) : Miami 4 < Washington > 6
@ + 150
( C ) : L.A. Dodgers 3 < Milwaukee > 4
@ - 173
Series net unit record for May : 5 - 0
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Seattle 3 < L.A.Angels > 2
@ - 133
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona > PPD.
( B ) : Atlanta 2 < Philadelphia > 5
@ - 146
( C ) : Miami 4 < Washington > 6
@ + 150
( C ) : L.A. Dodgers 3 < Milwaukee > 4
@ - 173
Series net unit record for May : 5 - 0
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona >
( A ) : San Francisco < San Diego >
( C ) : Atlanta < Philadelphia >
( C ) : N.Y.Mets < Baltimore >
( D ) : Miami < Washington >
( D ) : L.A. Dodgers < Milwaukee >
C ya in the winners circle
A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona >
( A ) : San Francisco < San Diego >
( C ) : Atlanta < Philadelphia >
( C ) : N.Y.Mets < Baltimore >
( D ) : Miami < Washington >
( D ) : L.A. Dodgers < Milwaukee >
C ya in the winners circle
A.R.
shouldn't there be two more A) level wagers today? Both Cincinnati and the Mets were shutout on Sunday and were off yesterday. Leaving a wager on of:
A)Pitt
A)Balt
Hope I didn't offend anyone, just wanting to understand the parameters of this chase and make sure I am playing the correct teams and levels.
shouldn't there be two more A) level wagers today? Both Cincinnati and the Mets were shutout on Sunday and were off yesterday. Leaving a wager on of:
A)Pitt
A)Balt
Hope I didn't offend anyone, just wanting to understand the parameters of this chase and make sure I am playing the correct teams and levels.
shouldn't there be two more A) level wagers today? Both Cincinnati and the Mets were shutout on Sunday and were off yesterday. Leaving a wager on of:
A)Pitt
A)Balt
Hope I didn't offend anyone, just wanting to understand the parameters of this chase and make sure I am playing the correct teams and levels.
shouldn't there be two more A) level wagers today? Both Cincinnati and the Mets were shutout on Sunday and were off yesterday. Leaving a wager on of:
A)Pitt
A)Balt
Hope I didn't offend anyone, just wanting to understand the parameters of this chase and make sure I am playing the correct teams and levels.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona >
( A ) : San Francisco < San Diego >
( A ) : Pittsburgh < Cincinnati >
( C ) : Atlanta < Philadelphia >
( C ) : N.Y.Mets < Baltimore >
vs.
( A ) : Baltimore < N.Y. Mets >
( D ) : Miami < Washington >
( D ) : L.A. Dodgers < Milwaukee >
C ya in the winners circle
A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona >
( A ) : San Francisco < San Diego >
( A ) : Pittsburgh < Cincinnati >
( C ) : Atlanta < Philadelphia >
( C ) : N.Y.Mets < Baltimore >
vs.
( A ) : Baltimore < N.Y. Mets >
( D ) : Miami < Washington >
( D ) : L.A. Dodgers < Milwaukee >
C ya in the winners circle
A.R.
shouldn't there be two more A) level wagers today? Both Cincinnati and the Mets were shutout on Sunday and were off yesterday. Leaving a wager on of:
A)Pitt
A)Balt
Hope I didn't offend anyone, just wanting to understand the parameters of this chase and make sure I am playing the correct teams and levels.
shouldn't there be two more A) level wagers today? Both Cincinnati and the Mets were shutout on Sunday and were off yesterday. Leaving a wager on of:
A)Pitt
A)Balt
Hope I didn't offend anyone, just wanting to understand the parameters of this chase and make sure I am playing the correct teams and levels.
Series record for September : 56 - 0
( A ) : 32 - 24
( B ) : 12 - 12
( C ) : 5 - 7
( D ) : 5 - 2
( E ) : 2 - 0
( F ) : 0 - 0
The 56 represents a total of 56 units net profit as well as 56 series that finished. In the first level ( A ), we won 32 series and lost 24 units. The loss is a temporary loss, because we continue trying to recoup those losses in the next level. We then recouped 12 of the 24 losses in level ( B ), so that left us with 12 more series to try and get a + 1 unit win along the way. So lets say ( for the point of being completely transparent ) that we had one of the September series that lost all 6 games. We would then list the full amount of loss in our net heading. That would have brought the month of September to a final tally of ( 55 - 63 ). Hopefully, we will never have to realize a full loss. However, if you are actually willing to follow this system through as a six game chase, we could theoretically suffer through two six games series defeats and still show a profit at the end of the season. Just something to consider and I hope this clears things up for you CASHEASY.
A.R.
Series record for September : 56 - 0
( A ) : 32 - 24
( B ) : 12 - 12
( C ) : 5 - 7
( D ) : 5 - 2
( E ) : 2 - 0
( F ) : 0 - 0
The 56 represents a total of 56 units net profit as well as 56 series that finished. In the first level ( A ), we won 32 series and lost 24 units. The loss is a temporary loss, because we continue trying to recoup those losses in the next level. We then recouped 12 of the 24 losses in level ( B ), so that left us with 12 more series to try and get a + 1 unit win along the way. So lets say ( for the point of being completely transparent ) that we had one of the September series that lost all 6 games. We would then list the full amount of loss in our net heading. That would have brought the month of September to a final tally of ( 55 - 63 ). Hopefully, we will never have to realize a full loss. However, if you are actually willing to follow this system through as a six game chase, we could theoretically suffer through two six games series defeats and still show a profit at the end of the season. Just something to consider and I hope this clears things up for you CASHEASY.
A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona > PPD
( A ) : San Francisco 6 < San Diego > 0
@ + 110
( A ) : Pittsburgh 1 < Cincinnati > 7
@ - 140
( C ) : Atlanta 9 < Philadelphia > 0
@ - 145
( C ) : N.Y.Mets 3 < Baltimore > 2
@ - 120
vs.
( A ) : Baltimore 2 < N.Y. Mets > 3
@ + 118
( D ) : Miami 2 < Washington > 1
@ + 165 ( best dog win to date )
( D ) : L.A. Dodgers 8 < Milwaukee > 2
@ - 150
Series net unit record for May : 10 - 0
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona > PPD
( A ) : San Francisco 6 < San Diego > 0
@ + 110
( A ) : Pittsburgh 1 < Cincinnati > 7
@ - 140
( C ) : Atlanta 9 < Philadelphia > 0
@ - 145
( C ) : N.Y.Mets 3 < Baltimore > 2
@ - 120
vs.
( A ) : Baltimore 2 < N.Y. Mets > 3
@ + 118
( D ) : Miami 2 < Washington > 1
@ + 165 ( best dog win to date )
( D ) : L.A. Dodgers 8 < Milwaukee > 2
@ - 150
Series net unit record for May : 10 - 0
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona >
( A ) : San Francisco < San Diego >
( A ) : Boston < Tampa Bay >
( A ) : Atlanta < Philadelphia >
( B ) : Pittsburgh < Cincinnati >
( B ) : Baltimore < N.Y. Mets >
* please note that Colorado will be involved in a DH today. Should they lose the first game, we will then move them up to a ( B ) level in the second game for today's card.
C ya in the winners circle
A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona >
( A ) : San Francisco < San Diego >
( A ) : Boston < Tampa Bay >
( A ) : Atlanta < Philadelphia >
( B ) : Pittsburgh < Cincinnati >
( B ) : Baltimore < N.Y. Mets >
* please note that Colorado will be involved in a DH today. Should they lose the first game, we will then move them up to a ( B ) level in the second game for today's card.
C ya in the winners circle
A.R.
Thank you A.R. and thanks to GhostNL for the explanations. Duh! I should have figured that out. Just new to chase stuff and I must get used to the reasoning and accounting. You guys are pretty cool to not only post your results and plays, but to explain things.
And thank you dougiefresh for your input as well.
Thank you A.R. and thanks to GhostNL for the explanations. Duh! I should have figured that out. Just new to chase stuff and I must get used to the reasoning and accounting. You guys are pretty cool to not only post your results and plays, but to explain things.
And thank you dougiefresh for your input as well.
Thank you A.R. and thanks to GhostNL for the explanations. Duh! I should have figured that out. Just new to chase stuff and I must get used to the reasoning and accounting. You guys are pretty cool to not only post your results and plays, but to explain things.
Thanks for the kind words CASH. Yea, the system is a season long grind and yea it has its specific nuances. It doesn't take too long before everyone who follows this system gets it down pat. We've got some very patient " vets " that give great input on a weekly basis. Welcome aboard and your ticket has been punched on the Pacific Surfliner sir.
A.R.
And thank you dougiefresh for your input as well.
Thank you A.R. and thanks to GhostNL for the explanations. Duh! I should have figured that out. Just new to chase stuff and I must get used to the reasoning and accounting. You guys are pretty cool to not only post your results and plays, but to explain things.
Thanks for the kind words CASH. Yea, the system is a season long grind and yea it has its specific nuances. It doesn't take too long before everyone who follows this system gets it down pat. We've got some very patient " vets " that give great input on a weekly basis. Welcome aboard and your ticket has been punched on the Pacific Surfliner sir.
A.R.
And thank you dougiefresh for your input as well.
Well, the football game in Coors Field is over and the Rockies lose by a touchdown 13-7.
We now move Colorado up to the ( B ) level in the second game which starts shortly against the Diamondbacks.
A.R.
Well, the football game in Coors Field is over and the Rockies lose by a touchdown 13-7.
We now move Colorado up to the ( B ) level in the second game which starts shortly against the Diamondbacks.
A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Colorado 7 < Arizona > 13
@ - 122
( A ) : San Francisco 1 < San Diego > 9
@ - 119
( A ) : Boston 3 < Tampa Bay > 5
@ - 120
( A ) : Atlanta 7 < Philadelphia > 5
@ - 126
( B ) : Pittsburgh 0 < Cincinnati > 3
@ - 145
( B ) : Baltimore 1 < N.Y. Mets > 5
@ + 113
( B ) : Colorado 1 < Arizona > 5
@ - 122
Series net unit record for May : 11 - 0
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Colorado 7 < Arizona > 13
@ - 122
( A ) : San Francisco 1 < San Diego > 9
@ - 119
( A ) : Boston 3 < Tampa Bay > 5
@ - 120
( A ) : Atlanta 7 < Philadelphia > 5
@ - 126
( B ) : Pittsburgh 0 < Cincinnati > 3
@ - 145
( B ) : Baltimore 1 < N.Y. Mets > 5
@ + 113
( B ) : Colorado 1 < Arizona > 5
@ - 122
Series net unit record for May : 11 - 0
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.