pendo, here's the way I calculate the MLB Shutout Sysytem 2016:
MM system: Làbrouché [flat betting a 2u formulated ratio of 1/6 attached to a MM equation of $20 per WIN]
unit denomination: $10
WINS: 82=164 units=$1,640
LOSS: 1=64 units=$640
ROI: ytd=approx $1000
pendo, here's the way I calculate the MLB Shutout Sysytem 2016:
MM system: Làbrouché [flat betting a 2u formulated ratio of 1/6 attached to a MM equation of $20 per WIN]
unit denomination: $10
WINS: 82=164 units=$1,640
LOSS: 1=64 units=$640
ROI: ytd=approx $1000
pendo, here's the way I calculate the MLB Shutout Sysytem 2016:
MM system: Làbrouché [flat betting a 2u formulated ratio of 1/6 attached to a MM equation of $20 per WIN]
unit denomination: $10
WINS: 82=164 units=$1,640
LOSS: 1=64 units=$640
ROI: ytd=approx $1000
pendo, here's the way I calculate the MLB Shutout Sysytem 2016:
MM system: Làbrouché [flat betting a 2u formulated ratio of 1/6 attached to a MM equation of $20 per WIN]
unit denomination: $10
WINS: 82=164 units=$1,640
LOSS: 1=64 units=$640
ROI: ytd=approx $1000
split it...hit it..or...cut it in half....
quite a simple MM (remembering; MM always overpowers the winning % ratio) concept to those dedicated to playin' the chase...
split it...hit it..or...cut it in half....
quite a simple MM (remembering; MM always overpowers the winning % ratio) concept to those dedicated to playin' the chase...
Yes, the half-martingale is an intervention when applying the Labouchere methodology to a win ratio of games (chase) where as a capper 'splits' his BR in 'half' after losing the first two games in a chase system, attaching the split to the third, fourth, or fifth wager, if necessary. this can be seen by my explanation to pendo in regards to the dramatic difference in d_opie +33 units (a structured, conservative MM, low risk approach) as opposed to playing the identical system, with the only difference being the application of a higher risk factor in MM, and the vast ROI margin of $1000 to $330...take care
Yes, the half-martingale is an intervention when applying the Labouchere methodology to a win ratio of games (chase) where as a capper 'splits' his BR in 'half' after losing the first two games in a chase system, attaching the split to the third, fourth, or fifth wager, if necessary. this can be seen by my explanation to pendo in regards to the dramatic difference in d_opie +33 units (a structured, conservative MM, low risk approach) as opposed to playing the identical system, with the only difference being the application of a higher risk factor in MM, and the vast ROI margin of $1000 to $330...take care
oil
the complete formulated split-Martingale system can be found at Wikipedia/Labouchere/Split Martingale.org...or simply google it for in-depth comprehension..it's not a secret..many handicapping sites give exclusive value to MM strategy, and the value by which it possesses..take care
oil
the complete formulated split-Martingale system can be found at Wikipedia/Labouchere/Split Martingale.org...or simply google it for in-depth comprehension..it's not a secret..many handicapping sites give exclusive value to MM strategy, and the value by which it possesses..take care
based on blind betting, and the value of game 3 has after two losses, the numbers you ask for are improbable to describe without an actual game at hand for discussion purposes, did you even acknowledge the recommendation in regards to doing research by way of wikipedia; who gives in-depth formulated MM systems, related to Labby, Martingale application (which are intertwined) what you are seeing in this thread is a mere outline to a formulated concept; 'a tip of the iceberg if you will' your questions have merit, and are justified, unfortunately, your taking simplicity, and going off the grid with complexity, based solely on the projection that you're just to lazy to do a little reading/research in your own behalf...it's just too much of a repetition to reprint what you can read and get full details on many sites dedicated to the answers by what you seek, that's not what this thread is about, and I Am not going to sabotage the subject matter on an unrelated discussion...PM me, or start your own (MM) thread for open discussion/participation...take care, and the best to you always,
based on blind betting, and the value of game 3 has after two losses, the numbers you ask for are improbable to describe without an actual game at hand for discussion purposes, did you even acknowledge the recommendation in regards to doing research by way of wikipedia; who gives in-depth formulated MM systems, related to Labby, Martingale application (which are intertwined) what you are seeing in this thread is a mere outline to a formulated concept; 'a tip of the iceberg if you will' your questions have merit, and are justified, unfortunately, your taking simplicity, and going off the grid with complexity, based solely on the projection that you're just to lazy to do a little reading/research in your own behalf...it's just too much of a repetition to reprint what you can read and get full details on many sites dedicated to the answers by what you seek, that's not what this thread is about, and I Am not going to sabotage the subject matter on an unrelated discussion...PM me, or start your own (MM) thread for open discussion/participation...take care, and the best to you always,
d_opie Appreciate the break down, and stats (3rd season in a row showing a profitable ROI +37.7 units) not bad at all....considering it suffered three losses, and recovered!
d_opie Appreciate the break down, and stats (3rd season in a row showing a profitable ROI +37.7 units) not bad at all....considering it suffered three losses, and recovered!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.