All Forums | Systems & Strategies

MLB system releases...

Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 238592
Posts: 2245
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #476
Quote Originally Posted by UsaSurfer:

I am making my first attempt at this with the Phillies vs. Nationals game today.  These teams and pitchers face each other often and I think there will be a lot of info out there.
 
If anyone could provide me with there calculations or even just results for this game, it would be very appreciated.

    Nationals 6.2 vs Phillies 5.7 .........total:11.9

    lean:WAS+240

    total play:over 9

    alternative:scratch

  take note:the above #'s are based on the BR/RC formula in 'pure' form, with no handicapping variables applicated.......later

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 289
Posted: #477
When you calculated Total Bases, do you include 1 base for a walk?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #478
Quote Originally Posted by UsaSurfer:

When you calculated Total Bases, do you include 1 base for a walk?

YES.......

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #479
MLB system releases Saturday 05/30/09 Base_Runs formula....
 
                                      Cardinals+125 RL
                                      Tigers+140 RL
                                      Yankees+105 RL
 
                                      Twins vs DevilRays OVER 8.5
                                      RedSox vs BlueJays UNDER 10
                                      Reds vs Brewers OVER 7.5
                                      Braves vs Diamondbacks OVER 8.5
 
 
gp:7
projected wins:5
reference:experimental RL / DOG
wagering$:yes
objective:documentation
form:unit management/value plays
 
 
                                 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 101
Posted: #480
so for the over r we just taking the offense on both sides vs starting pitcher and if both teams hit that guy well we go for it?  dumb ? i know but this is interesting?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #481
Quote Originally Posted by bigcountry26:

so for the over r we just taking the offense on both sides vs starting pitcher and if both teams hit that guy well we go for it?  dumb ? i know but this is interesting?

The odds against both teams having exact final equations are astronomical...The BR 'read' is your base, and is used as a tool in determining your final "cut" leading to your wagers on the days action....

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 101
Posted: #482
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:

The odds against both teams having exact final equations are astronomical...The BR 'read' is your base, and is used as a tool in determining your final "cut" leading to your wagers on the days action....

 

ok that makes more sense would you be able to give a quick dummy example pretend lets say the dodger and cubs without realy spending your time lookn at it just throw me an example if it isn't too much trouble

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #483
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:

    Nationals 6.2 vs Phillies 5.7 .........total:11.9

    lean:WAS+240

    total play:over 9

    alternative:scratch

  take note:the above #'s are based on the BR/RC formula in 'pure' form, with no handicapping variables applicated.......later

bigcountry26, your requested 'example'.......

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 289
Posted: #484
 
I completed my base Runs analysis for the Phils vs. Nationals game.  I want to start with simply attacking the first five innings to see how my methods work.  I am getting a similar result of Nationals with a slight edge, but I am also getting numbers higher than what is reasonable.  (WAS 7.5 vs. PHI 5.5 for the first five innings)
 
My process was determing the Base Runs for each player against the opposing starter, then dividing that figure by 9 innings, then multiplying the per inning base runs by 5 to determine the first five innings result.  I am sure I am oversimplifying the process.
 
Any advice?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 101
Posted: #485
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:

bigcountry26, your requested 'example'.......

 

that helps thanks!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 101
Posted: #486
br being base runs correct?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #487
Quote Originally Posted by UsaSurfer:

 
  (WAS 7.5 vs. PHI 5.5 for the first five innings)*
 
My process was determing the Base Runs for each player against the opposing starter, then dividing that figure by 9 innings, then multiplying the per inning base runs by 5 to determine the first five innings result.  I am sure I am oversimplifying the process.
 
Any advice?

*cut this in half, and you have your BR results:

        (WAS 3.7 vs PHI 2.7  5innings)

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #488
Quote Originally Posted by bigcountry26:

br being base runs correct?

BR=Base_Runs

RC=Runs_Created

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #489
Quote Originally Posted by UsaSurfer:

 
   " I am sure I am oversimplifying the process."
 
Any advice?

better to 'oversimplify' than 'undercomplicate' ........

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 101
Posted: #490

Sports N

How long does it take you on an average game day to cap this info?  Today isnt bad because of being off work, but as i was reading earlier in this thread time can be an issue during the week.  Do you do every game or do look at pitchn mathcup first and work your way from there?

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 101
Posted: #491
Sports N,
 
one more ? do you factor in how each pitcher mathces up against right or left handed hitters or just go on the previous history against each team?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #492
Quote Originally Posted by bigcountry26:

Sports N

How long does it take you on an average game day to cap this info?  Today isnt bad because of being off work, but as i was reading earlier in this thread time can be an issue during the week.  Do you do every game or do look at pitchn mathcup first and work your way from there?

I capp every game (about 20 minutes per) then make a final cut to decide on the wagers, which in this particular form have resulted in RL plays/action (I am speaking on the experimental form iniciated)

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #493
Quote Originally Posted by bigcountry26:

Sports N,
 
one more ? do you factor in how each pitcher mathces up against right or left handed hitters or just go on the previous history against each team?

righty/lefty plays a strong factor, every available sabermetric stat is taken into consideration, and applied, take nothing for granted...

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 23
Posted: #494
hey network, out of the Cardinals+125 RL
                                      Tigers+140 RL
                                      Yankees+105 RL which one you have the strongest lean or runs different? thanks
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #495
Quote Originally Posted by kC1234:

hey network, out of the Cardinals+125 RL
                                      Tigers+140 RL
                                      Yankees+105 RL which one you have the strongest lean or runs different? thanks

Cardinals+125 RL  is two**  I have 4 units invested in this game...

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 101
Posted: #496
got ya.  i guess some days ill just have to do what i can.  i'm going to watch u guys for a bit on the overs ill just cap teams to win for now
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 23
Posted: #497
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:

Cardinals+125 RL  is two**  I have 4 units invested in this game...


thanks network, i was considering that as well after checking out both carpender and zitos record.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #498
Quote Originally Posted by bigcountry26:

got ya.  i guess some days ill just have to do what i can.  i'm going to watch u guys for a bit on the overs ill just cap teams to win for now

I would recommend you scroll through the entire thread from it's conception, to gain insight, and concept, it's self explainatory, and brings the answer's to your questions to the forefront, upon review. the details will give you a more in-depth understanding, and an assessment on it's success ratio, that stands at a 70% advantage

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #499
Quote Originally Posted by kC1234:


thanks network, i was considering that as well after checking out both carpender and zitos record.

 Zito's stats are inflated, and not 'clear'..he's weak, and holding on for the sake of his multi-contract. As the season progresses, Zito's value as a SP will deteriate to zero effect.....

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 7
Posted: #500
Quote Originally Posted by PuckHog:

Thanks   uzovka........  is the other file u shared related to BBL?

                                    LM SETUP.exe

Hi Puck.

The other file I created for my friend, who is testing progressive Labouchere math system in long run for MLB. It's old version, we're using the new one now.

We need to wait couple of months for the results ;)


                     

All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.