Like cappin' your win...you also must capp your MM. which totally overpowers your winning % and provides 'insurance' when putting together a 'package' (four plays or more) The amount of unit$ wagered on each play is determined by the strength of the lean, and the value it possesses'....This is the concept behind the many MM formula's applied to MLB package play, with the core being the RL...a capper could go 3-4 (as I did a couple day's ago) and still come out with +2unit$...thus, a capper on the same Identical plays, with in-correct MM could go 4-3, and be -2unit$ by a blink..
The key ingredient to MM is the almighty Bankroll, with an improper BR, a capper is at a severe dis-advantage, regardless of how successful his form is initiated..How does one acquire a BR, to begin correct MM? Can it be done through sports wagering? Are their any formula's attached to the BR syndrome? What's the ideology behind a sports wagering/investment BR?
Like cappin' your win...you also must capp your MM. which totally overpowers your winning % and provides 'insurance' when putting together a 'package' (four plays or more) The amount of unit$ wagered on each play is determined by the strength of the lean, and the value it possesses'....This is the concept behind the many MM formula's applied to MLB package play, with the core being the RL...a capper could go 3-4 (as I did a couple day's ago) and still come out with +2unit$...thus, a capper on the same Identical plays, with in-correct MM could go 4-3, and be -2unit$ by a blink..
The key ingredient to MM is the almighty Bankroll, with an improper BR, a capper is at a severe dis-advantage, regardless of how successful his form is initiated..How does one acquire a BR, to begin correct MM? Can it be done through sports wagering? Are their any formula's attached to the BR syndrome? What's the ideology behind a sports wagering/investment BR?
Post #785 states directly that he went 4-6 for the day but was up 2+ units for the day. I know it is only one day, but you said that "Every individual should have their own MM system and can apply it accordingly, SN should not have to do that for us."
Well my MM system is to play games evenly. If I wanted to follow his system I would be losing money with my MM and his system. Now if Sports Network wanted to list his units per play with picks it would make this a lot easier.
I understand he has no obligadtion to do this and i also understand that he is doing all this for free. However, I respect others on this site to not mislead them and I hope others would do the same. I like to think of Covers as a place where most posters are honest and not lying to look better. Im not accusing anyone of lying, but until Sports Network starts posting units with plays how am I to believe that he goes 4-6 on a given day and still makes 2+ units, or goes 5-3-1 and wins an astounding 14+ units in a day.
Im not saying it cant be done. But it needs to be stated before the fact, not after.
Billwag is correct when Sports Network does give out useful info. And we all do appreciate his effort. However, this site isn't for trying to impress people, its for finding effective ways to beat books. And I would hate to think that someone is embellishing their records for the sake of trying to look better.
I apologize for any typo's as I have had a few tonight, but this has been bothering me for some time. I dont mean this post as a method for trying to bash, but more as a means for being honest and forthcoming. BOL to everyone and please if I am wrong, let me know....and ill blame it on the alcohol.
Post #785 states directly that he went 4-6 for the day but was up 2+ units for the day. I know it is only one day, but you said that "Every individual should have their own MM system and can apply it accordingly, SN should not have to do that for us."
Well my MM system is to play games evenly. If I wanted to follow his system I would be losing money with my MM and his system. Now if Sports Network wanted to list his units per play with picks it would make this a lot easier.
I understand he has no obligadtion to do this and i also understand that he is doing all this for free. However, I respect others on this site to not mislead them and I hope others would do the same. I like to think of Covers as a place where most posters are honest and not lying to look better. Im not accusing anyone of lying, but until Sports Network starts posting units with plays how am I to believe that he goes 4-6 on a given day and still makes 2+ units, or goes 5-3-1 and wins an astounding 14+ units in a day.
Im not saying it cant be done. But it needs to be stated before the fact, not after.
Billwag is correct when Sports Network does give out useful info. And we all do appreciate his effort. However, this site isn't for trying to impress people, its for finding effective ways to beat books. And I would hate to think that someone is embellishing their records for the sake of trying to look better.
I apologize for any typo's as I have had a few tonight, but this has been bothering me for some time. I dont mean this post as a method for trying to bash, but more as a means for being honest and forthcoming. BOL to everyone and please if I am wrong, let me know....and ill blame it on the alcohol.
Un-like the others I am getting ready to address, we have discussed this by way of PM and shall continue to do so; attaching your screen name to there's as a form of class action, only shows their ignorance, as you understand a completely different side of the coin, based on our past correspondance, please continue, through PM.. best regards SN
Un-like the others I am getting ready to address, we have discussed this by way of PM and shall continue to do so; attaching your screen name to there's as a form of class action, only shows their ignorance, as you understand a completely different side of the coin, based on our past correspondance, please continue, through PM.. best regards SN
your respect, and approach shines, I made an attemp to share the unit formula, and it's application with you two weeks ago as you requested, you rejected the PM , and to this day it is still 'pending' check your Space! this thread is not geared to "help" anyone out. I donate my time to those who have an interest in my work, and a respectable approach, to gain this courtesy...check your PM before you continue to embarass yourself...best regards SN
your respect, and approach shines, I made an attemp to share the unit formula, and it's application with you two weeks ago as you requested, you rejected the PM , and to this day it is still 'pending' check your Space! this thread is not geared to "help" anyone out. I donate my time to those who have an interest in my work, and a respectable approach, to gain this courtesy...check your PM before you continue to embarass yourself...best regards SN
I understand you are the only 'true' professional' and your assessment has substance, I have received your PM and waiting for you to activate my response, looking forward to working with you...I am NOT messing with peoples minds in no way, on the contrary, I am forcing them to "use" their own minds, mine is not for rent, or lease.. With all due respect....SN
I understand you are the only 'true' professional' and your assessment has substance, I have received your PM and waiting for you to activate my response, looking forward to working with you...I am NOT messing with peoples minds in no way, on the contrary, I am forcing them to "use" their own minds, mine is not for rent, or lease.. With all due respect....SN
First of all, don't include Darkhorse in your commentary without out his consent, he never asked me anything 3weeks ago, and his resent above post has nothing to do with you. stand on your own two feet! Like kbit, I ANSWERED your question through PM it was you who did not activate, and it's still 'pending' So why would you come into my thread to gain nothing other than attention, and refer to my work as 'bullshit' "time to show and prove" this thread is totally documented and speaks for itself to be successful, it's flawless in nature of negative approach. Take what you refer to as BS and go somewhere else to "bottom feed" this thread, or your amatuer understanding of MLB handicapping is way over your head at this point; good bye
don't they have a special 'word' for people who degrade proven success beyond a shadow of doubt ? I am under the impression this word is.. "Idiot" with a capitol " I " SN
First of all, don't include Darkhorse in your commentary without out his consent, he never asked me anything 3weeks ago, and his resent above post has nothing to do with you. stand on your own two feet! Like kbit, I ANSWERED your question through PM it was you who did not activate, and it's still 'pending' So why would you come into my thread to gain nothing other than attention, and refer to my work as 'bullshit' "time to show and prove" this thread is totally documented and speaks for itself to be successful, it's flawless in nature of negative approach. Take what you refer to as BS and go somewhere else to "bottom feed" this thread, or your amatuer understanding of MLB handicapping is way over your head at this point; good bye
don't they have a special 'word' for people who degrade proven success beyond a shadow of doubt ? I am under the impression this word is.. "Idiot" with a capitol " I " SN
Your post deserves no response, your assessment is that of a dis-grunted "bottom feeder" what you say means nothing to me or this thread in particular..Capp your own games, and attach your own units, I am not your handicapping "bitch" go somewhere else if you don't understand the concept of this thread..Did I invite you? SN
Your post deserves no response, your assessment is that of a dis-grunted "bottom feeder" what you say means nothing to me or this thread in particular..Capp your own games, and attach your own units, I am not your handicapping "bitch" go somewhere else if you don't understand the concept of this thread..Did I invite you? SN
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.