Milkman,
I ran quickly through and found 16 losses in the AL in 2008 and 16 losses 2009. Some teams were very solid while others werent. I am going to go back through the data for running the chase both ways to determine which teams accounted for the losses.
Milkman,
I ran quickly through and found 16 losses in the AL in 2008 and 16 losses 2009. Some teams were very solid while others werent. I am going to go back through the data for running the chase both ways to determine which teams accounted for the losses.
Milkman,
what do you mean by their next similar series?
I have been working all day on another angle. I will post it in another thread. Looks pretty promising also. Would have been very good in 2009, but haven't tested it for 2008 yet...
Milkman,
what do you mean by their next similar series?
I have been working all day on another angle. I will post it in another thread. Looks pretty promising also. Would have been very good in 2009, but haven't tested it for 2008 yet...
Okay guys since we have some time before our next play. I looked back at the theoretical losses from 2008, 2009 to see if we had any habitual offenders. Here is what I found
2008:
AL
Home : KC, CLE, TOR x2, NYY
Away: Tex, DET
2009:
Home: MIN
Away: DET, NYY
NL
2008:
Home: COL*, StL, PIT x 2, MIL*, WAS
Away: LAD, COL*, MIL*, WAS* , FLA
2009:
Home: MIL*, HOU
Away: AZ, MIL*, CIN, PHI, FLA
A few repeat offenders, primarily MIL who has accounted for two losses each year. Four teams DET, NYY, MIL, FLA appeared as losses both seasons. I backtested them into 2007 and the only one that would have posted a loss that year was NYY with one loss.... I guess my point is to use caution this season when these teams appear as plays. I will try to point them out as we go along.
Okay guys since we have some time before our next play. I looked back at the theoretical losses from 2008, 2009 to see if we had any habitual offenders. Here is what I found
2008:
AL
Home : KC, CLE, TOR x2, NYY
Away: Tex, DET
2009:
Home: MIN
Away: DET, NYY
NL
2008:
Home: COL*, StL, PIT x 2, MIL*, WAS
Away: LAD, COL*, MIL*, WAS* , FLA
2009:
Home: MIL*, HOU
Away: AZ, MIL*, CIN, PHI, FLA
A few repeat offenders, primarily MIL who has accounted for two losses each year. Four teams DET, NYY, MIL, FLA appeared as losses both seasons. I backtested them into 2007 and the only one that would have posted a loss that year was NYY with one loss.... I guess my point is to use caution this season when these teams appear as plays. I will try to point them out as we go along.
Milkman,
what do you mean by their next similar series?
I have been working all day on another angle. I will post it in another thread. Looks pretty promising also. Would have been very good in 2009, but haven't tested it for 2008 yet...
Milkman,
what do you mean by their next similar series?
I have been working all day on another angle. I will post it in another thread. Looks pretty promising also. Would have been very good in 2009, but haven't tested it for 2008 yet...
System record: 1-0-0
Plays for 4/12:
Series #2 (game 1) 1:05 kc @ DET
Series #3 (game 1) 7:05 TB @ bal
Pending:
SF @ lad (4/16)
PHI @ atl (4/20)
FLA @ hou (4/20)-- fading HOU at home
cle @ MIN (4/20)--- fading CLE on road
TOR @ tb (4/23)
Game 1 wins= 1
Game 2 wins = 0
Game 3 wins = 0
System record: 1-0-0
Plays for 4/12:
Series #2 (game 1) 1:05 kc @ DET
Series #3 (game 1) 7:05 TB @ bal
Pending:
SF @ lad (4/16)
PHI @ atl (4/20)
FLA @ hou (4/20)-- fading HOU at home
cle @ MIN (4/20)--- fading CLE on road
TOR @ tb (4/23)
Game 1 wins= 1
Game 2 wins = 0
Game 3 wins = 0
System record: 2-0-0
Plays for 4/13:
Series #2 (game 2) 1:05 kc @ DET -145
Series #3 (game 1 wins) TB
Pending:
SF @ lad (4/16)
PHI @ atl (4/20)
FLA @ hou (4/20)-- fading HOU at home
cle @ MIN (4/20)--- fading CLE on road
TOR @ tb (4/23)
Game 1 wins= 2
Game 2 wins = 0
Game 3 wins = 0
System record: 2-0-0
Plays for 4/13:
Series #2 (game 2) 1:05 kc @ DET -145
Series #3 (game 1 wins) TB
Pending:
SF @ lad (4/16)
PHI @ atl (4/20)
FLA @ hou (4/20)-- fading HOU at home
cle @ MIN (4/20)--- fading CLE on road
TOR @ tb (4/23)
Game 1 wins= 2
Game 2 wins = 0
Game 3 wins = 0
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.