System record: 2-0-0
Plays for 4/13:
Series #2 (game 2) 1:05 kc @ DET -123
Series #3 (game 1 wins) TB
Pending:
SF @ lad (4/16)
PHI @ atl (4/20)
FLA @ hou (4/20)-- fading HOU at home
cle @ MIN (4/20)--- fading CLE on road
TOR @ tb (4/23)
Game 1 wins= 2
Game 2 wins = 0
Game 3 wins = 0
System record: 2-0-0
Plays for 4/13:
Series #2 (game 2) 1:05 kc @ DET -123
Series #3 (game 1 wins) TB
Pending:
SF @ lad (4/16)
PHI @ atl (4/20)
FLA @ hou (4/20)-- fading HOU at home
cle @ MIN (4/20)--- fading CLE on road
TOR @ tb (4/23)
Game 1 wins= 2
Game 2 wins = 0
Game 3 wins = 0
Okay to something more productive than complaining.
AL 2007 120-7
Playing all teams greater than -150 on -1.5 RL = 118-9
added games = 11 (i.e. playing -150 on -1.5 RL will push series to a game 2 or 3 as opposed to winning game 1 or 2)
Game 1 wins = 71 (71-58, 55%)
Game 2 wins = 34 (34-24, 58.6%)
Game 3 wins = 15 (15-9, 62.5%) 120-91, 56.9%
Okay to something more productive than complaining.
AL 2007 120-7
Playing all teams greater than -150 on -1.5 RL = 118-9
added games = 11 (i.e. playing -150 on -1.5 RL will push series to a game 2 or 3 as opposed to winning game 1 or 2)
Game 1 wins = 71 (71-58, 55%)
Game 2 wins = 34 (34-24, 58.6%)
Game 3 wins = 15 (15-9, 62.5%) 120-91, 56.9%
System record: 3-0-0
Results for 4/13:
Series #2 (game 2 wins) DET -123
---thank you baseball gods for the huge 7th inning!
Pending:
SF @ lad (4/16)
PHI @ atl (4/20)
FLA @ hou (4/20)-- fading HOU at home
cle @ MIN (4/20)--- fading CLE on road
TOR @ tb (4/23)
Game 1 wins= 2
Game 2 wins = 1
Game 3 wins = 0
System record: 3-0-0
Results for 4/13:
Series #2 (game 2 wins) DET -123
---thank you baseball gods for the huge 7th inning!
Pending:
SF @ lad (4/16)
PHI @ atl (4/20)
FLA @ hou (4/20)-- fading HOU at home
cle @ MIN (4/20)--- fading CLE on road
TOR @ tb (4/23)
Game 1 wins= 2
Game 2 wins = 1
Game 3 wins = 0
System record: 3-0-0
No Plays for 4/14:
Pending:
SF @ lad (4/16)
TB @ BOS (4/16) or CWS (4/20)
PHI @ atl (4/20)
FLA @ hou (4/20)-- fading HOU at home
cle @ MIN (4/20)--- fading CLE on road
TOR @ tb (4/23)
NYY @ bal (4/27)-- fading BAL at home
Game 1 wins= 2
Game 2 wins = 1
Game 3 wins = 0
-- a little apprehensive about all the road plays as these have been slightly higher risk in the past
System record: 3-0-0
No Plays for 4/14:
Pending:
SF @ lad (4/16)
TB @ BOS (4/16) or CWS (4/20)
PHI @ atl (4/20)
FLA @ hou (4/20)-- fading HOU at home
cle @ MIN (4/20)--- fading CLE on road
TOR @ tb (4/23)
NYY @ bal (4/27)-- fading BAL at home
Game 1 wins= 2
Game 2 wins = 1
Game 3 wins = 0
-- a little apprehensive about all the road plays as these have been slightly higher risk in the past
One thing I wrote a note to look at, but it had slipped my mind:
2009
AL 17 road series = 1 loss, 2 interleague losses
NL 17 road series = 1 loss, 1 interleague loss
2008
AL 13 road series = 0 losses, 0 interleague losses
NL 21 road series = 1 loss, 1 interleague loss
2007
AL 25 road series = 1 loss, 2 interleague losses
NL 8 road series = 0 losses, 0 interleague losses
** would recommend not playing IL games as add little value considering added losses. There have been a consistent number of road series plays last three years with some added risk but likely still profitable overall. Just wanted to point this out as these plays may increase risk some.
---2008 record based on opening lines (at pinnacle) to see if they are similar to the closing lines used in initially testing this should be up by the end of the night.
One thing I wrote a note to look at, but it had slipped my mind:
2009
AL 17 road series = 1 loss, 2 interleague losses
NL 17 road series = 1 loss, 1 interleague loss
2008
AL 13 road series = 0 losses, 0 interleague losses
NL 21 road series = 1 loss, 1 interleague loss
2007
AL 25 road series = 1 loss, 2 interleague losses
NL 8 road series = 0 losses, 0 interleague losses
** would recommend not playing IL games as add little value considering added losses. There have been a consistent number of road series plays last three years with some added risk but likely still profitable overall. Just wanted to point this out as these plays may increase risk some.
---2008 record based on opening lines (at pinnacle) to see if they are similar to the closing lines used in initially testing this should be up by the end of the night.
One thing I wrote a note to look at, but it had slipped my mind:
2009
AL 17 road series = 1 loss, 2 interleague losses
NL 17 road series = 1 loss, 1 interleague loss
2008
AL 13 road series = 0 losses, 0 interleague losses
NL 21 road series = 1 loss, 1 interleague loss
2007
AL 25 road series = 1 loss, 2 interleague losses
NL 8 road series = 0 losses, 0 interleague losses
** would recommend not playing IL games as add little value considering added losses. There have been a consistent number of road series plays last three years with some added risk but likely still profitable overall. Just wanted to point this out as these plays may increase risk some.
---2008 record based on opening lines (at pinnacle) to see if they are similar to the closing lines used in initially testing this should be up by the end of the night.
Sorry everyone I posted this in the wrong thread. It was intended for my other system. I have not found a difference in interleague plays for this system. Sorry for any confusion
One thing I wrote a note to look at, but it had slipped my mind:
2009
AL 17 road series = 1 loss, 2 interleague losses
NL 17 road series = 1 loss, 1 interleague loss
2008
AL 13 road series = 0 losses, 0 interleague losses
NL 21 road series = 1 loss, 1 interleague loss
2007
AL 25 road series = 1 loss, 2 interleague losses
NL 8 road series = 0 losses, 0 interleague losses
** would recommend not playing IL games as add little value considering added losses. There have been a consistent number of road series plays last three years with some added risk but likely still profitable overall. Just wanted to point this out as these plays may increase risk some.
---2008 record based on opening lines (at pinnacle) to see if they are similar to the closing lines used in initially testing this should be up by the end of the night.
Sorry everyone I posted this in the wrong thread. It was intended for my other system. I have not found a difference in interleague plays for this system. Sorry for any confusion
Bittersweet for me today milkman. Believe it or not, I was actually on HOU, NYM, and OAK today. I even parlayed HOU and NYM I am absolutely shocked it hit!
Bittersweet for me today milkman. Believe it or not, I was actually on HOU, NYM, and OAK today. I even parlayed HOU and NYM I am absolutely shocked it hit!
System record: 3-0-0
Plays for 4/16:
***Okay guys not sure how many people are following this system but there are a couple of issues with the upcoming plays I want to point out to everyone. There are two possible plays starting tomorrow.
Series #4 (Game 1) 7:10 TB @ bos -181
Series #5 (Game 1) 10:10 SF @ lad -145
Here are my concerns, with the opening lines this high there is a 20% chance of the home team sweeping the road team (based on last years results). The TB/BOS series is a four game series which I would have skipped when backtesting as I didn't want to chase for four games. I feel these teams will hit but we are all individuals and have to make decisions for ourselves. I am going to offer to skip these series for those interested to the next series which are three games and will likely have better odds.
Series #4 alt. (Game 1) 4/20 TB @ cws
Series #5 alt (Game 1) 4/19 SF @ sd
I am surprised the lines for tomorrow are so high as I feel these teams are more evenly matched. I want everyone to be as informed as possible and make the plays as they feel best. The games tomorrow may be higher risk/reward. Please play what you feel most comfortable with. I will post the standard and alternate plays over the next 4-6 days. This was backtested based on closing lines so if these significantly drop overnight the sf at lad would have fit the backtested criteria. BOL to everyone
Pending:
PHI @ atl (4/20)
FLA @ hou (4/20)-- fading HOU at home
cle @ MIN (4/20)--- fading CLE on road
TOR @ tb (4/23)
NYY @ bal (4/27)-- fading BAL at home
Game 1 wins= 2
Game 2 wins = 1
Game 3 wins = 0
-- a little apprehensive about all the road plays as these have been slightly higher risk in the past
System record: 3-0-0
Plays for 4/16:
***Okay guys not sure how many people are following this system but there are a couple of issues with the upcoming plays I want to point out to everyone. There are two possible plays starting tomorrow.
Series #4 (Game 1) 7:10 TB @ bos -181
Series #5 (Game 1) 10:10 SF @ lad -145
Here are my concerns, with the opening lines this high there is a 20% chance of the home team sweeping the road team (based on last years results). The TB/BOS series is a four game series which I would have skipped when backtesting as I didn't want to chase for four games. I feel these teams will hit but we are all individuals and have to make decisions for ourselves. I am going to offer to skip these series for those interested to the next series which are three games and will likely have better odds.
Series #4 alt. (Game 1) 4/20 TB @ cws
Series #5 alt (Game 1) 4/19 SF @ sd
I am surprised the lines for tomorrow are so high as I feel these teams are more evenly matched. I want everyone to be as informed as possible and make the plays as they feel best. The games tomorrow may be higher risk/reward. Please play what you feel most comfortable with. I will post the standard and alternate plays over the next 4-6 days. This was backtested based on closing lines so if these significantly drop overnight the sf at lad would have fit the backtested criteria. BOL to everyone
Pending:
PHI @ atl (4/20)
FLA @ hou (4/20)-- fading HOU at home
cle @ MIN (4/20)--- fading CLE on road
TOR @ tb (4/23)
NYY @ bal (4/27)-- fading BAL at home
Game 1 wins= 2
Game 2 wins = 1
Game 3 wins = 0
-- a little apprehensive about all the road plays as these have been slightly higher risk in the past
Milkman,
You have any leans on these series. Not sure how I am going to play them since they are opposite plays in my two systems. I am surprised these lines are this high which may add some value in playing the dogs???
Milkman,
You have any leans on these series. Not sure how I am going to play them since they are opposite plays in my two systems. I am surprised these lines are this high which may add some value in playing the dogs???
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.