All Forums | Systems & Strategies

Modified Sweep Chase 122-3 in AL in 2009

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 19323
Posts: 378
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 2304
Posted: #201

Series Record = 17-2-0

pick em's = 1-0

Results for 4/29: 

Series #19 (game 3) 8:05              cin @ HOU -160

pickem #2 (game 1) 8:05              mil @ sd -132

 

Pending:

CIN @ stl (4/30)

cin @ STL (4/30)

LAA @ det  (4/30)

cws @ NYY  (4/30)

chw @ NYY (4/30) --fading CWS on road

min @ CLE (4/30)

tex @ SEA (4/30)

kc @ CWS (5/3)

TOR @ cle (5/3)

atl @ WAS (5/4)--fading atl on the road

sf @ FLA (5/4) -- fading SF on the road

CHIC @ pit--- fading pit at home

CHC @ pit 5/4

sf @ NYM (5/7)

lad @ AZ (5/10) - fading lad on the road

Game 1 wins= 9

Game 2 wins = 6

Game 3 wins = 2

Losses: 2 -15.9U 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 2304
Posted: #202
guys, I looked back at teams coming off a four game sweep last year.  The record was 22-0 with all of the games covering on the RL.  I will post the STL play as a pickem but I will be on the cards.  I am going to backtest this during the weekend also.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 2304
Posted: #203

Quote Originally Posted by stickbit:

Rizz...reading both threads and I noticed both systems generate quite a few plays...do you play both systems? Are there a lot of plays that conflict? Thanks for all of your hard work! Oh yea and F&*K Houston!

There are a fair amount that conflict.  As far as I know thus far in those situations both teams have gotten a win in the series.  I agree with you on houston.  They started so crappy everyone had them on auto fade they tricked a lot of us..  I think we overvalued that sweep over another crappy team for sure.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 2304
Posted: #204

Series Record = 17-2-0

pick em's = 1-0

Plays for 4/30: 

Series #20 (game 1) 7:05                LAA-117 @ det

Series #21 (game 1) 7:05                cws  @ NYY -220, RL

Series #22 (game 1) 7:05                min @ CLE -120

Series #23 (game 1) 10:10              TEX +132 @ sea

pickem #2 (game 2) 8:05                mil @ sd -132

pickem #3 (game 1) 8:15                cin @ stl -186

 HOU pissed me off lets get it back!

 

Pending:

kc @ CWS (5/3)

TOR @ cle (5/3)

atl @ WAS (5/4)--fading atl on the road

sf @ FLA (5/4) -- fading SF on the road

CHIC @ pit--- fading pit at home

CHC @ pit 5/4

sf @ NYM (5/7)

lad @ AZ (5/10) - fading lad on the road

Game 1 wins= 9

Game 2 wins = 6

Game 3 wins = 2

Losses: 2 -15.9U 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 2304
Posted: #205

Series Prices for 4/30 Plays

TEX +180

CLE +115

LAA -115

STL -320

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 139
Posted: #206
Also i have a certain chase system that i just finished doing the backtesting on from 1990-present for NBA AND MLB that i found that has never encountered enough losses to eat up the alotted bankroll.Thats 20 plus years of data, so its pretty significant. I am no way shape of form a tout, i just use simple tech analysis to get my "zones of entry" coupled with fundamental analysis to give me the best exact entry to start my system. If anyone is serious about changing their financial lives and want this info at a very reasonable price, email me at jpanoma1@hotmail.com .  You can already see what my simple info has done for supereagle in his chase,  he simply just  took the chance to listen, thus hes reeping the benefits, you can as well....
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 7572
Posted: #207
jpanoma.....GET LOST!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 114
Posted: #208

Is Texas or Seattle the play.

It seems you have Seattle in bold a few posts back #202 and now you say Texas is the play in #205?

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 139
Posted: #209
Quote Originally Posted by avenue:

jpanoma.....GET LOST!
  Hello, please check out supereagle in his system that he uses, he has nothing but good words for the little bit of knowledge that i have given him,vand also by reading this thread, you all are over analyzing, but hey its your money....JP
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 139
Posted: #210
Quote Originally Posted by scotth69:

not sure how this site works, but on other gambling sites this dude would be banned for posting crap like this in someones thread!

Let's Get Houston in.

I had such a good day yesterday and I'm still trying to get the hang of these multiple labby lines, i have reset things with a base bet on them.

 

Thanks Rizz!

  Please check out supereagle in his thread. I enlightened him to just a little bit of information and he has nothing but good words for what i told him, hes utilizing my advice, and now hes fully optimizing his profit potential, but for you, i so love the haters, keep overanalyzing if you want...JP
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 7572
Posted: #211
Rizz wanted me to post that the play is on Seattle, who last swept Balt at home.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 406
Posted: #212

Quote Originally Posted by jpanoma1:

  Please check out supereagle in his thread. I enlightened him to just a little bit of information and he has nothing but good words for what i told him, hes utilizing my advice, and now hes fully optimizing his profit potential, but for you, i so love the haters, keep overanalyzing if you want...JP

Big F'N deal jpahomo, you told him to use grand martingale and now he is up $10  more then he would of been.  Your my hero!!!!  Post your system or get lost!!!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 114
Posted: #213

Quote Originally Posted by avenue:

Rizz wanted me to post that the play is on Seattle, who last swept Balt at home.

 

Thanks!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 2304
Posted: #214

Series Record = 18-2-0

pick em's = 1-0

Plays for 4/30: 

Series #20 (game 1) 7:05                LAA-117 @ det  

Series #21 (game 1) 7:05               cws  @ NYY -220, RL

Series #22 (game 1) 7:05                min @ CLE -120 

Series #23 (game 1) 10:10              tex +132 @ SEA  pending

pickem #2 (game 2) 8:05                mil @ sd -132

pickem #3 (game 1) 8:15                cin @ stl -186

 Sorry guys about the mix up on tex/sea series.  If it looks like I messed something up I probably did!

 

Pending:

kc @ CWS (5/3)

TOR @ cle (5/3)

atl @ WAS (5/4)--fading atl on the road

sf @ FLA (5/4) -- fading SF on the road

CHIC @ pit--- fading pit at home

CHC @ pit 5/4

sf @ NYM (5/7)

lad @ AZ (5/10) - fading lad on the road

Game 1 wins= 10

Game 2 wins = 6

Game 3 wins = 2

Losses: 2 -15.9U 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 2304
Posted: #215
What do you guys think about just playing the pickem series on the home team??  We already know from back testing the away plays are more risky???
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 2304
Posted: #216

Series Record = 18-2-0

pick em's = 1-0

Plays for 5/1: 

Series #20 (game 2) 1:05                LAA-101 @ det  

Series #22 (game 2) 7:05                min @ CLE -107

Series #23 (game 2) 3:10              tex @ SEA-210 

pickem #2 (game 3) 8:35                mil @ sd +115

pickem #3 (game 2) 1:10                cin @ stl -181

 

 

Pending:

kc @ CWS (5/3)

TOR @ cle (5/3)

atl @ WAS (5/4)--fading atl on the road

sf @ FLA (5/4) -- fading SF on the road

CHIC @ pit--- fading pit at home

CHC @ pit 5/4

sf @ NYM (5/7)

lad @ AZ (5/10) - fading lad on the road

Game 1 wins= 10

Game 2 wins = 6

Game 3 wins = 2

Losses: 2 -15.9U 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 2304
Posted: #217

Series Record = 19-2-0

pick em's = 2-0

Results for 5/1: 

Series #20 (game 2) 1:05                LAA-101 @ det  

Series #22 (game 2) 7:05                min @ CLE -107     

Series #23 (game 2) 3:10              tex @ SEA-210      

pickem #2 (game 3) 8:35                mil @ sd +115 ---pending

pickem #3 (game 2) 1:10                cin @ stl -181      

 

 

Pending:

kc @ CWS (5/3)

TOR @ cle (5/3)

atl @ WAS (5/4)--fading atl on the road

sf @ FLA (5/4) -- fading SF on the road

CHIC @ pit--- fading pit at home

CHC @ pit 5/4

sf @ NYM (5/7)

lad @ AZ (5/10) - fading lad on the road

Game 1 wins= 10

Game 2 wins = 6

Game 3 wins = 2

Losses: 2 -15.9U 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 2304
Posted: #218
This system is getting pretty hairy guys.  Two more G3 bets for tomorrow.  I am hoping this settles in and teams become more consistent but right now it seems this season may be a lot more risky than previous years would have been??? Proceed with caution, money management is key.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 2304
Posted: #219
Quote Originally Posted by therizz:

Series Record = 19-2-0

pick em's = 2-0

Results for 5/1: 

Series #20 (game 2) 1:05                LAA-101 @ det  

Series #22 (game 2) 7:05                min @ CLE -107     

Series #23 (game 2) 3:10              tex @ SEA-210      

pickem #2 (game 3) 8:35                mil @ sd +115 ---pending

pickem #3 (game 2) 1:10                cin @ stl -181      

 

 

Pending:

kc @ CWS (5/3)

TOR @ cle (5/3)

atl @ WAS (5/4)--fading atl on the road

sf @ FLA (5/4) -- fading SF on the road

CHIC @ pit--- fading pit at home

CHC @ pit 5/4

sf @ NYM (5/7)

lad @ AZ (5/10) - fading lad on the road

Game 1 wins= 10

Game 2 wins = 7

Game 3 wins = 2

Losses: 2 -15.9U 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 2304
Posted: #220
Looking back at previous seasons numbers, seems like we should be doing better on the early level games???  Only hitting around 50% on all plays taken together.  It is not a very big deal if you are playing labby but I worry about people playing straight martingale and laying a lot of juice on some of these plays.  Just want to stress caution until we really get into a groove and/or have a better feel on the contenders and pretenders this year...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 2304
Posted: #221

Series Record = 19-2-0

pick em's = 3-0

Results for 5/1: 

Series #20 (game 2) 1:05                LAA-101 @ det  

Series #22 (game 2) 7:05                min @ CLE -107     

Series #23 (game 2) 3:10              tex @ SEA-210      

pickem #2 (game 3) 8:35                mil @ sd +115 ---

pickem #3 (game 2) 1:10                cin @ stl -181      

 

 

Pending:

kc @ CWS (5/3)

TOR @ cle (5/3)

atl @ WAS (5/4)--fading atl on the road

sf @ FLA (5/4) -- fading SF on the road

CHIC @ pit--- fading pit at home

CHC @ pit 5/4

sf @ NYM (5/7)

lad @ AZ (5/10) - fading lad on the road

Game 1 wins= 10

Game 2 wins = 7

Game 3 wins = 2

Losses: 2 -15.9U 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 2304
Posted: #222

Series Record = 19-2-0

pick em's = 3-0

Plays for 5/2: 

Series #20 (game 3) 1:05                LAA+105 @ det  

Series #23 (game 3) 4:10              tex @ SEA-120

 

 

Pending:

kc @ CWS (5/3)

TOR @ cle (5/3)

atl @ WAS (5/4)--fading atl on the road

sf @ FLA (5/4) -- fading SF on the road

CHIC @ pit--- fading pit at home

CHC @ pit 5/4

sf @ NYM (5/7)

lad @ AZ (5/10) - fading lad on the road

Game 1 wins= 10

Game 2 wins = 7

Game 3 wins = 2

Losses: 2 -15.9U 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 1165
Posted: #223
Question therizz, Did You Ever Put Into Account That These Teams You Have Backtested Are Not Going To Be Ranked The Same For This Year, So The System Would Definitely Need Adjustments To It Based On That?  Just Curious Of What You Thought About This.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 2304
Posted: #224

Quote Originally Posted by jaybosstein:

Question therizz, Did You Ever Put Into Account That These Teams You Have Backtested Are Not Going To Be Ranked The Same For This Year, So The System Would Definitely Need Adjustments To It Based On That?  Just Curious Of What You Thought About This.

Jay,

This system wasn't backtested using any rankings.  That being said, this thing has really started to suck ass this year.  So many inconsistent teams!

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 2304
Posted: #225

Series Record = 19-4-0

pick em's = 3-0

Results for 5/2: 

Series #20 (game 3) 1:05                LAA+105 @ det  

Series #23 (game 3) 4:10              tex @ SEA-120      

 

 

Pending:

kc @ CWS (5/3)

TOR @ cle (5/3)

atl @ WAS (5/4)--fading atl on the road

sf @ FLA (5/4) -- fading SF on the road

CHIC @ pit--- fading pit at home

CHC @ pit 5/4

sf @ NYM (5/7)

lad @ AZ (5/10) - fading lad on the road

Game 1 wins= 10

Game 2 wins = 7

Game 3 wins = 2

*Losses: 4, -36.4U

*U lost reflects playing system for ML on all plays straight martingale to win 1U, would obviously not recommend doing so. 

 

All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.