Last time I respond to you , if you want to talk loser lets look at your record for 2011. You say 88-2 lmao nice try , more like 100-7 for a loss of roughly 50 units great system thanks for sharing, adios! I think the short bus just pulled up to take you to school.
0
Quote Originally Posted by flwareagle:
Still don't get it loser. Hahaha
Last time I respond to you , if you want to talk loser lets look at your record for 2011. You say 88-2 lmao nice try , more like 100-7 for a loss of roughly 50 units great system thanks for sharing, adios! I think the short bus just pulled up to take you to school.
Last time I respond to you , if you want to talk loser lets look at your record for 2011. You say 88-2 lmao nice try , more like 100-7 for a loss of roughly 50 units great system thanks for sharing, adios! I think the short bus just pulled up to take you to school.
Wow...you get sadder by the moment. How much of your life did you waste backtesting (which you obviously can't do properly)? Hahaha. Keep up the entertainment.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:
Last time I respond to you , if you want to talk loser lets look at your record for 2011. You say 88-2 lmao nice try , more like 100-7 for a loss of roughly 50 units great system thanks for sharing, adios! I think the short bus just pulled up to take you to school.
Wow...you get sadder by the moment. How much of your life did you waste backtesting (which you obviously can't do properly)? Hahaha. Keep up the entertainment.
Wow...you get sadder by the moment. How much of your life did you waste backtesting (which you obviously can't do properly)? Hahaha. Keep up the entertainment.
Only took about an hour to expose your lack of brains. I have all the plays written down. The only error I made is not saying you would have lost roughly 75 units using your loss amounts instead of 50 thanks for trying!
0
Quote Originally Posted by flwareagle:
Wow...you get sadder by the moment. How much of your life did you waste backtesting (which you obviously can't do properly)? Hahaha. Keep up the entertainment.
Only took about an hour to expose your lack of brains. I have all the plays written down. The only error I made is not saying you would have lost roughly 75 units using your loss amounts instead of 50 thanks for trying!
Only took about an hour to expose your lack of brains. I have all the plays written down. The only error I made is not saying you would have lost roughly 75 units using your loss amounts instead of 50 thanks for trying!
There you go (possibly) making up numbers again...haha. I'll tell you what, this is my last post. I will let you get the last word in and won't respond. I'm just not sure why you took a defensive position from the very beginning. We are all supposed to be here to learn systems so that we can succeed (even though the vast majority won't). It looked (and still looks) like a good system. Since that is the reason for this forum, I just inquired as to what it was. From the beginning, you refused to explain your system or even explain why you wouldn't (which you finally did much later in the thread). You just got very defensive when I questioned the records that a stranger (which is what we are) posted when there was no way to back test your system or it's results. You just said that we should just bet your picks. That would be no different than betting any other stranger's picks. For someone that has been handicapping for 29 years, I would think that you also follow that line of thinking if you have been successful that whole time (which I'm not disputing...I don't know you). Had you just stated from the beginning that you were just providing picks and not a system, I would have never bothered.
As far as the results of my system, I can only vouch for what I found when I backtested. That is why I posted it on this message board so that maybe someone can find errors in my system. I am just trying to find good systems since I suck at handicapping. I have done well since I started betting systems last year...although I still make mistakes. I am currently playing four different systems, but don't post the others because i am not ready to share. I'm not calling you a liar, but I'm not sure if you backtested it properly. It took me awhile to do because I had to make sure each team was .525 or better when they lost. Maybe you have a program and database to do it quicker, but I do not. And all I can post is the record that I have of the bets that I have made this year (didn't play this last year) for that system and it is currently 62-1 with two opens: TB (D) and CIN (B). If I have been that lucky to have missed the other losses you claim to have found then good for me.
I don't claim to be an expert or even good at this. I do know that I started with a personal bankroll of $2,000 for baseball betting $20 units and my current balance is $4,262 (+113 units). All with systems I either got from here or made up myself based on ideas from this forum. I know I'm not getting rich (yet...haha) with that, but I think it is a decent start for me.
You can continue to rip me or whatever if you want to and I won't respond as stated before. However, I actually do wish you continued success with the faint hope that you may share it one day. Plus money systems are the best in my opinion.
Anyways, my novel is over...goodbye.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:
Only took about an hour to expose your lack of brains. I have all the plays written down. The only error I made is not saying you would have lost roughly 75 units using your loss amounts instead of 50 thanks for trying!
There you go (possibly) making up numbers again...haha. I'll tell you what, this is my last post. I will let you get the last word in and won't respond. I'm just not sure why you took a defensive position from the very beginning. We are all supposed to be here to learn systems so that we can succeed (even though the vast majority won't). It looked (and still looks) like a good system. Since that is the reason for this forum, I just inquired as to what it was. From the beginning, you refused to explain your system or even explain why you wouldn't (which you finally did much later in the thread). You just got very defensive when I questioned the records that a stranger (which is what we are) posted when there was no way to back test your system or it's results. You just said that we should just bet your picks. That would be no different than betting any other stranger's picks. For someone that has been handicapping for 29 years, I would think that you also follow that line of thinking if you have been successful that whole time (which I'm not disputing...I don't know you). Had you just stated from the beginning that you were just providing picks and not a system, I would have never bothered.
As far as the results of my system, I can only vouch for what I found when I backtested. That is why I posted it on this message board so that maybe someone can find errors in my system. I am just trying to find good systems since I suck at handicapping. I have done well since I started betting systems last year...although I still make mistakes. I am currently playing four different systems, but don't post the others because i am not ready to share. I'm not calling you a liar, but I'm not sure if you backtested it properly. It took me awhile to do because I had to make sure each team was .525 or better when they lost. Maybe you have a program and database to do it quicker, but I do not. And all I can post is the record that I have of the bets that I have made this year (didn't play this last year) for that system and it is currently 62-1 with two opens: TB (D) and CIN (B). If I have been that lucky to have missed the other losses you claim to have found then good for me.
I don't claim to be an expert or even good at this. I do know that I started with a personal bankroll of $2,000 for baseball betting $20 units and my current balance is $4,262 (+113 units). All with systems I either got from here or made up myself based on ideas from this forum. I know I'm not getting rich (yet...haha) with that, but I think it is a decent start for me.
You can continue to rip me or whatever if you want to and I won't respond as stated before. However, I actually do wish you continued success with the faint hope that you may share it one day. Plus money systems are the best in my opinion.
@ flwareagle: My thoughts exactly on systems. nice that you are up 113 units. hope you share more systems with us later :)
@Jeffthehat: I appreciate that you are sharing your systems, however, backtesting is crucial (i didnt see past records) and an explanation is great. In the forums we can help each other by bouncing ideas off of each other and find ways to make systems and/or strategies better.
BOL all
0
@ flwareagle: My thoughts exactly on systems. nice that you are up 113 units. hope you share more systems with us later :)
@Jeffthehat: I appreciate that you are sharing your systems, however, backtesting is crucial (i didnt see past records) and an explanation is great. In the forums we can help each other by bouncing ideas off of each other and find ways to make systems and/or strategies better.
I just checked prior thread and saw you are doing 3 game chase. Just to be sure, you don't ever chase 4 games in a 4 game series, right? I think 3 games then call it a loss is better than any 4 game chase as those get too expensive.
Good luck with your plays!
0
I just checked prior thread and saw you are doing 3 game chase. Just to be sure, you don't ever chase 4 games in a 4 game series, right? I think 3 games then call it a loss is better than any 4 game chase as those get too expensive.
Jeff, of the six losses you have would any/all be eliminated if you played these dogs +1.5? Looks like you're quite profitable with your current structure. Just a passing thought.
Much continued success! Friend request sent. Thanks again for your efforts.
0
Jeff, of the six losses you have would any/all be eliminated if you played these dogs +1.5? Looks like you're quite profitable with your current structure. Just a passing thought.
Much continued success! Friend request sent. Thanks again for your efforts.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
