All Forums | Systems & Strategies

ncaaf correlated parlays

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 15987
Posts: 146
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 380
Posted: #1
monitor move me here - my past forum on correlsted parlays (cps) can be viewed in college football forum - there are 5 cps this week - 317/324/345/371/392/ - 404 is pending @ 39% - free money 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 134
Posted: #2
I'm there with you.   I went 6-2 last week on these.  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 134
Posted: #3

A couple more pendings...Michigan/Minnesota & Kentucky/So Carolina

Total of 8 potential plays this week.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 380
Posted: #4
Quote Originally Posted by breezeyo:

A couple more pendings...Michigan/Minnesota & Kentucky/So Carolina

Total of 8 potential plays this week.

gl it's great if you can play these 404 baylor 27.5/68.5 added as it just crossed the 40% line
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #5
What book lets you play those? Has to be a local?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 67
Posted: #6

I have been using an online book, they wont take anything over 33%, sometimes less, they can be stubborn, but I have done well there.

I 'tease' it down , sometimes to 27% depending on what I think I know about the teams (ha!), and have a profit to show for the last 2 years.

Occasionally I will do the first half, again 'depending'.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 380
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by ross33:

I have been using an online book, they wont take anything over 33%, sometimes less, they can be stubborn, but I have done well there.

I 'tease' it down , sometimes to 27% depending on what I think I know about the teams (ha!), and have a profit to show for the last 2 years.

Occasionally I will do the first half, again 'depending'.

must bet with local - no sportsbook will take these - they average 70%
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 134
Posted: #8

Hat -

I bet with a local who accepts these plays.   And, have also found that betting the 1H tends to have better results and will generate a few more plays, usually the borderline ones. 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 2179
Posted: #9
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1562
Posted: #10

1. Alabama/Georgia state is at 94%, with such a high percentage wouldn't it be better to play this game big instead of playing the other games in this time slot? Or would you just play all plays that are 40% equally?

2. Is it more beneficial to play these plays for 1h or game?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 380
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by MakeThatCasH:


1. Alabama/Georgia state is at 94%, with such a high percentage wouldn't it be better to play this game big instead of playing the other games in this time slot? Or would you just play all plays that are 40% equally?

2. Is it more beneficial to play these plays for 1h or game?
must play all games over 40% for consistent winners-i play game total only - however 1h works - don't want to disturb local too much
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 380
Posted: #12
at 1st glance it would appear 94% can't lose but believe me it can - i've seen it happen - i just play them all over 40% and collect - there will be losing weeks - but long range winner guaranteed 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1562
Posted: #13
Thanks.

Do you think it is more profitable to play 1h or game?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 380
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by MakeThatCasH:

Thanks.

Do you think it is more profitable to play 1h or game?
haven't really checked due to fact i play the game and not the 1h - trying not to upset my local - but i would think long range it would be about the same 70% - gl
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 2179
Posted: #15
1h is better
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 380
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by ERBATIZ:

1h is better
i can stat that out - but don't really want to take the time - have you friend? 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1562
Posted: #17

Does anyone know when 1h lines come out in Vegas? Is it at midnight today for 1h lines for tomm?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 380
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by MakeThatCasH:


Does anyone know when 1h lines come out in Vegas? Is it at midnight today for 1h lines for tomm?
i have them already friend but you can't bet them in vegas
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1562
Posted: #19
So there are 6 plays this weekend, if you go 3 wins and 3 losses wouldn't that be losing overall? I assume 2 game parlays pay about 2.5.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 380
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by MakeThatCasH:

So there are 6 plays this weekend, if you go 3 wins and 3 losses wouldn't that be losing overall? I assume 2 game parlays pay about 2.5.
i have no intention of going 3-3 looking for 70% or better - hopefully 5-2 - a 2 team parlay pays 13-5 sir everywhere
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1562
Posted: #21
If you were to play 100 on each fav/over and dog/under, a win is about 350 and a loss is -200. 3 wins would be 1050 - 3 losses of 600 for a total of 450 but you started with 1200. Is my math not correct?

Or would it hit at a higher rate?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 380
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by MakeThatCasH:

If you were to play 100 on each fav/over and dog/under, a win is about 350 and a loss is -200. 3 wins would be 1050 - 3 losses of 600 for a total of 450 but you started with 1200. Is my math not correct?

Or would it hit at a higher rate?
my mistake above - expect to go 4-2 or better - 6 teams @ 100 would be a 1200 lay - 3-3 would result in a -120 loss / 3 losses -600 /3 wins @ 160 = 480 - difference -120 - this correct sir
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 2179
Posted: #23
1h -7.5 and up   63-32 so ytd ,  week 6  14 to 17 games i cant play them but im keeping track
wk1 12-7
wk2 17-5
wk3 11-7
wk4 11-6
wk5 12-7
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 380
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by ERBATIZ:

1h -7.5 and up   63-32 so ytd ,  week 6  14 to 17 games i cant play them but im keeping track
wk1 12-7
wk2 17-5
wk3 11-7
wk4 11-6
wk5 12-7
i can - wish i was - wow
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1562
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by clem1:

my mistake above - expect to go 4-2 or better - 6 teams @ 100 would be a 1200 lay - 3-3 would result in a -120 loss / 3 losses -600 /3 wins @ 160 = 480 - difference -120 - this correct sir

According to my calculations, you have to hit at least 5 out of 6 plays to turn a profit. Is this correct? New to this, sorry for the strange questions
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright � 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.