All Forums | Systems & Strategies

New YPPT Method

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 253696
Posts: 1286
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 680
Posted: #1051

Adding Selections

UL  Monroe -3.0

Colorado St. +1.0

GL

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 1493
Posted: #1052

Quote Originally Posted by DaBoyz2009:

Airmail is a joke

   at DaBoyz2009

At least I don't flip flop on plays like these two goofballs do.  Easy to have a winning system when the results are all over the board.    

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 1194
Posted: #1053
Butta Can you give the exact  Website address to get that most recent spread sheet?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 1493
Posted: #1054
Quote Originally Posted by coldsnap55:

It's good of you to keep track of these plays seeing how busy you are with your " Wannabe Tout Threads"

Page 1 in the Tout Handbook ;

 

Thanks to all who are bookmarking the blog....saw many hits last night...these picks will eventually be exclusively on the blog

Not sure how that's any different than any other post.  Oh wait I do.  It's one person, with one set of picks.  With one result. 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 680
Posted: #1055

Another Roughshod Late Game Selection

Oklahoma / Nebraska   UNDER   41.5


GL

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 2256
Posted: #1056
Quote Originally Posted by vegasplayer:

Butta Can you give the exact  Website address to get that most recent spread sheet?


Let try this again....

1. go to therxforumdotcom
2. then go to college football forum
3. Search for the thread (best too to help cappers win in NCAAF&NFL) if you dont see it on page 1 go to page 2 etc..
4. Look in the thread on page 1 the link is there....
5. If that doesnt help then you should be at a basic/infant school..
GL....
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 19
Posted: #1057

Did anybody notice that the YPPT system went 0-5 ATS in the NFL on Sunday? 

Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck.

Especially the Cardinals. 

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 1493
Posted: #1058
Why do you think it went from 900 posts the first two weeks to just over 100 posts the last two weeks.  Everyone is off this system.  How did NCAA do today boys?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 129
Posted: #1059
did you losers see what it did today?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 129
Posted: #1060
did you losers see what it did today?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 1493
Posted: #1061

Depends which picks you are looking at.  Like I said they are all over the board.  Rough looks like he did okay...then we see a post using VG's system that went 4-11.  Throw enough different games out there and you are bound to find a combo that is a winner.

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 304
Posted: #1062
Quote Originally Posted by Airmail26:

Depends which picks you are looking at.  Like I said they are all over the board.  Rough looks like he did okay...then we see a post using VG's system that went 4-11.  Throw enough different games out there and you are bound to find a combo that is a winner.

 

 Given there is no system that predict upset. How many there was there today. Just like Oregon, they got a spanking after everyone claimed they are above and better than Boise after that tremendous win they have last week. Should Stanford be in the top 10 after their win?.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 3142
Posted: #1063
Roughs picks looked good to me 8-3 for saturday.....win or lose thank you rough and vgpop and others, that take the time out to figure out this system, its greatly appreciated
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 10
Posted: #1064
Quote Originally Posted by lou4062:

 

I downloaded this spread sheet to check it out and it is very well done!  There are two small things I changed about it.

1. On cell 45 A I changed the name to Home Team.

2. On cell 39 B I changed the cell from =G 16 to  =G 14.  The reason for this is the original was setup to only take into account the "home team" rushing yards instead "all" rushing yards.

Some of you might haved figured this out already.  I just thought I would post the info. 



which version of the system is on the rx forum?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 304
Posted: #1065

Rough or VG, can you post the number that you ran for this week.

Thanks.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 790
Posted: #1066
Quote Originally Posted by Airmail26:

   at DaBoyz2009

At least I don't flip flop on plays like these two goofballs do.  Easy to have a winning system when the results are all over the board.    



So what were your play that you didn't flip flop on? Is it posted on this site somewhere???
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 129
Posted: #1067
AIRMAIL you just joined on in Oct and posted 100  times just bitchin. why don't you post your NFL picks and show us how good your picks are and stop bitchin about this tread
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 58
Posted: #1068
Quote Originally Posted by roughshod31:

Sorry for cutting so close to game time.

Roughshod31 System Picks Saturday 

Connecticut       +17.0       W

Syracuse            +21.5      L

Louisville            +17.0     W

LSU/Alabama  UNDER  39.5    W

Ohio St./Penn St.   UNDER  41.0    W

TCU       -24.5     W

Fresno St.  -8.0   W

Washington St.   +32.0    L


GL


Looks like Rough went 6-2, digging for VG's picks...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 58
Posted: #1069
Quote Originally Posted by jc2211:


Looks like Rough went 6-2, digging for VG's picks...

Opps...he added the following late:

UL  Monroe -3.0      W

Colorado St. +1.0    L


Updated Rough record: 7-3

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 129
Posted: #1070
 Roughshod had 3 more picks on this page

Adding Selections

UL  Monroe -3.0

Colorado St. +1.0 and

Another Roughshod Late Game Selection

Oklahoma / Nebraska   UNDER   41.5

GL 2-1 here
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 129
Posted: #1071
 Roughshod had 3 more picks on this page

Adding Selections

UL  Monroe -3.0

Colorado St. +1.0 and

Another Roughshod Late Game Selection

Oklahoma / Nebraska   UNDER   41.5

GL 2-1 here
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 58
Posted: #1072
Quote Originally Posted by luckierod:

 Roughshod had 3 more picks on this page

Adding Selections

UL  Monroe -3.0

Colorado St. +1.0 and

Another Roughshod Late Game Selection

Oklahoma / Nebraska   UNDER   41.5

GL 2-1 here

I think that covers all his picks, so Rough went 8-3
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 185
Posted: #1073
Roughshod where you be???
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 680
Posted: #1074

Sundays NFL Projections

                                    Score      # of Plays

Kansas City ( +7.0)        24              (67)

Jacksonville                 17              (58)


Baltimore                     24              (62)

Cincinnati                     23              (60)


Houston                         17             (67)

Indianapolis                   24             (54)


Washington                    10*            (50)

Atlanta  (-9.0)                  30*            (69)


Green Bay                       27           (53)

Tampa Bay                      17           (61)


Arizona (+3.0)                   27           (65)

Chicago                            20           (56)


Miami  (+10.5)                    20          (63)

New England                      21         (57)


Carolina                              17        (59)

New Orleans (-13.0)              41*      (66)


Detroit                                   17        (64)

Seattle                                 23          (58)


Tennessee                         17               (67)

San Francisco                    28               (54)


San Diego                         31                (51)

NY Giants                           28                (64)


Dallas   (+3.0)                     30                (68)

Philadelphia                       21               (56)       


Games with an * reflect scores that needed to be altered because of excessive SOS difference. ( I cap SOS @ 1.150 on the high side & .850 on the low end.)

GL                          

 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 680
Posted: #1075

The reason for # of plays in the projections is I noticed last night that all of my winning / covering sides for the day were projected to run more plays than their opponent. On the flip side all of my losing sides yesterday were not. Its a very small sample, but one that I am going to pay attention in the future starting today.

GL


All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.