Final results for the year:
Original Bankroll - $740
Current Bankroll - $1,900.95 ($1,160.95 gain, 156.8% gain on bankroll)
Thanks to all that followed and commented. Special thanks to Ken for pinch hitting while I was in the Caribbean!
Final results for the year:
Original Bankroll - $740
Current Bankroll - $1,900.95 ($1,160.95 gain, 156.8% gain on bankroll)
Thanks to all that followed and commented. Special thanks to Ken for pinch hitting while I was in the Caribbean!
$1,160 / 158% says it all.....
Incredible what a MM formula; blended with Twin play can accomplish..a very profitable thread for those that followed. let's give credit where credit is due...."well done Dan", appreciate your effort.., and thank you for CHI and COL to close it out....
$1,160 / 158% says it all.....
Incredible what a MM formula; blended with Twin play can accomplish..a very profitable thread for those that followed. let's give credit where credit is due...."well done Dan", appreciate your effort.., and thank you for CHI and COL to close it out....
Yes that is how I will be betting it. Considering adding running a labby line on each team separately as well. I'm back testing the last two years to see how it would play out. Stay tuned...
Yes that is how I will be betting it. Considering adding running a labby line on each team separately as well. I'm back testing the last two years to see how it would play out. Stay tuned...
His example is a little off but the idea is there. He is using traditional parlay payouts of 13:5. Ours is a little tricky given some of the high odds.
I ran the numbers for 2 years ago when I first posted/ran the system. That year we had a profit of 259 units, using the pay dues method we would have won 153 units. A couple of high odds during a chase that goes to 8 games resulting in a pretty large game 8 wager. If that would have lost, we would have lost more than the 74 units that it would have cost us on the regular parlay system.
For now, I won't consider the pay dues method. I have to look to see if it can be applied to a +odds parlay using the PL in our system for any faves. The bets should stay somewhat low, but winning % is going to be bad. Will let you know what I find out. I'll use last year since we suffered an 8 game loss. If bets are low enough, no reason to stop at 8 games on the + odds method (I hope).
His example is a little off but the idea is there. He is using traditional parlay payouts of 13:5. Ours is a little tricky given some of the high odds.
I ran the numbers for 2 years ago when I first posted/ran the system. That year we had a profit of 259 units, using the pay dues method we would have won 153 units. A couple of high odds during a chase that goes to 8 games resulting in a pretty large game 8 wager. If that would have lost, we would have lost more than the 74 units that it would have cost us on the regular parlay system.
For now, I won't consider the pay dues method. I have to look to see if it can be applied to a +odds parlay using the PL in our system for any faves. The bets should stay somewhat low, but winning % is going to be bad. Will let you know what I find out. I'll use last year since we suffered an 8 game loss. If bets are low enough, no reason to stop at 8 games on the + odds method (I hope).
His example is a little off but the idea is there. He is using traditional parlay payouts of 13:5. Ours is a little tricky given some of the high odds.
I ran the numbers for 2 years ago when I first posted/ran the system. That year we had a profit of 259 units, using the pay dues method we would have won 153 units. A couple of high odds during a chase that goes to 8 games resulting in a pretty large game 8 wager. If that would have lost, we would have lost more than the 74 units that it would have cost us on the regular parlay system.
For now, I won't consider the pay dues method. I have to look to see if it can be applied to a +odds parlay using the PL in our system for any faves. The bets should stay somewhat low, but winning % is going to be bad. Will let you know what I find out. I'll use last year since we suffered an 8 game loss. If bets are low enough, no reason to stop at 8 games on the + odds method (I hope).
His example is a little off but the idea is there. He is using traditional parlay payouts of 13:5. Ours is a little tricky given some of the high odds.
I ran the numbers for 2 years ago when I first posted/ran the system. That year we had a profit of 259 units, using the pay dues method we would have won 153 units. A couple of high odds during a chase that goes to 8 games resulting in a pretty large game 8 wager. If that would have lost, we would have lost more than the 74 units that it would have cost us on the regular parlay system.
For now, I won't consider the pay dues method. I have to look to see if it can be applied to a +odds parlay using the PL in our system for any faves. The bets should stay somewhat low, but winning % is going to be bad. Will let you know what I find out. I'll use last year since we suffered an 8 game loss. If bets are low enough, no reason to stop at 8 games on the + odds method (I hope).
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.