NHL 2 Team road parlay system

Sorry for the delay, was hoping for some line movement. Wash is one of the teams. Almost everywhere I look Philly is a bigger fave or same as LA. I usually use 5dimes lines which have LA as the bigger fave. So I'm going with Philly for a couple reasons. We are getting some better odds using 5dimes and I thnk it's the better play ayway. LA has a bad road record while Ott is good at home. Anyway..

Game 1, Wash -123 and Phil +100, $10 to win $26.26 

you got it oilcountry99

Oil I don't think you can use the 8 game progression that I use for the parlay system, for your idea. It was meant to take advantage of the higher payouts for a parlay. You'd have to modify to fit a single play chase.

I do not know the W/L record of individual games but maybe a labby line on both might work if the win% is high enough. I can maybe do some testing.

Oil (and Dan),

Here are some numbers you may find helpful in your analysis:

Parlaying a fade against the "official plays" has hit 6 times to date (and as you can imagine, they had high yields given the amount of dogs involved).

GM1=2

GM2=1

GM3=1

GM5=1

GM7=1

*another game 7 currently pending

Playing those same fades individually and categorizing them as "stronger dog" (fade against the weaker road fav) and "weaker dog" (fade against the stronger road fav) results in:

Stronger Dog

16-9  (64% win rate)

GM1=10

GM2= 3

GM3=3

Played in a straight marty progression = YTD of +17.7units

Played in a chase as "to win" 1 unit = YTD of +16units

Weaker Dog

11-14 (44% win rate)

GM1= 6

GM2= 2

GM3= 1

GM4= 1 (plus one pending)

GM5= 1

Played in a straight marty progression = YTD of +24.6units

Played in a chase as "to win" 1 unit = YTD of +11units

Personally, I think a straight marty on the stronger dog and a "to win" chase on the weaker is the way to go (at least until the break)...thoughts?