The problem with this system is the odds vary....you're highest odds selection should be placed on the series that's deepest into the progression. There are times when you will win a bet and lose money on the series progression. As you progress through the series there is a minimum odds requirement to break even or profit on the set.
0
The problem with this system is the odds vary....you're highest odds selection should be placed on the series that's deepest into the progression. There are times when you will win a bet and lose money on the series progression. As you progress through the series there is a minimum odds requirement to break even or profit on the set.
The problem with this system is the odds vary....you're highest odds selection should be placed on the series that's deepest into the progression. There are times when you will win a bet and lose money on the series progression. As you progress through the series there is a minimum odds requirement to break even or profit on the set.
Yeah. And days like this one happens. I forgot to place the 1st Bet Risking 220 on Tampa Bay -1.5 because it was too busy in the office. And right now they are leading 2-1 over Detroit @ 2nd Period at this time.
0
Quote Originally Posted by oilcountry99:
The problem with this system is the odds vary....you're highest odds selection should be placed on the series that's deepest into the progression. There are times when you will win a bet and lose money on the series progression. As you progress through the series there is a minimum odds requirement to break even or profit on the set.
Yeah. And days like this one happens. I forgot to place the 1st Bet Risking 220 on Tampa Bay -1.5 because it was too busy in the office. And right now they are leading 2-1 over Detroit @ 2nd Period at this time.
What about trying a progression more like this [1x, 2x, 3x, 5x, 8x] instead of adding $40 risk after each loss? This progression should guarantee you a profit. Of course risk is higher but you can adjust your unit as required.
Your current risk (100,140,180,220,260 = $900)
Proposed progression at x=100
(100,200,300,500,800 = $1900)
Use x=50
(50,100,150,250,400 = $950)
Just a thought.....
0
What about trying a progression more like this [1x, 2x, 3x, 5x, 8x] instead of adding $40 risk after each loss? This progression should guarantee you a profit. Of course risk is higher but you can adjust your unit as required.
What about trying a progression more like this [1x, 2x, 3x, 5x, 8x] instead of adding $40 risk after each loss? This progression should guarantee you a profit. Of course risk is higher but you can adjust your unit as required.
Your current risk (100,140,180,220,260 = $900)
Proposed progression at x=100
(100,200,300,500,800 = $1900)
Use x=50
(50,100,150,250,400 = $950)
Just a thought.....
Not even sure this would work...minimum odds would be required to profit depending on progression level
0
Quote Originally Posted by oilcountry99:
What about trying a progression more like this [1x, 2x, 3x, 5x, 8x] instead of adding $40 risk after each loss? This progression should guarantee you a profit. Of course risk is higher but you can adjust your unit as required.
Your current risk (100,140,180,220,260 = $900)
Proposed progression at x=100
(100,200,300,500,800 = $1900)
Use x=50
(50,100,150,250,400 = $950)
Just a thought.....
Not even sure this would work...minimum odds would be required to profit depending on progression level
What about trying a progression more like this [1x, 2x, 3x, 5x, 8x] instead of adding $40 risk after each loss? This progression should guarantee you a profit. Of course risk is higher but you can adjust your unit as required.
Your current risk (100,140,180,220,260 = $900)
Proposed progression at x=100
(100,200,300,500,800 = $1900)
Use x=50
(50,100,150,250,400 = $950)
Just a thought.....
That's a good suggestion. I'll have to think about that. Thanks.
0
Quote Originally Posted by oilcountry99:
What about trying a progression more like this [1x, 2x, 3x, 5x, 8x] instead of adding $40 risk after each loss? This progression should guarantee you a profit. Of course risk is higher but you can adjust your unit as required.
Your current risk (100,140,180,220,260 = $900)
Proposed progression at x=100
(100,200,300,500,800 = $1900)
Use x=50
(50,100,150,250,400 = $950)
Just a thought.....
That's a good suggestion. I'll have to think about that. Thanks.
Wednesday - November 16, 2016:1st Bet Pittsburgh -1.5 +250 Risk 220 To Win 5502nd Bet Calgary -1.5 +250 Risk 140 To Win 3503rd Bet Calgary -1.5 +250 Risk 140 To Win 350
Nov 17 Vancouver -1.5 +235 risk 260 to win 611
0
Quote Originally Posted by JoeMahirap:
Wednesday - November 16, 2016:1st Bet Pittsburgh -1.5 +250 Risk 220 To Win 5502nd Bet Calgary -1.5 +250 Risk 140 To Win 3503rd Bet Calgary -1.5 +250 Risk 140 To Win 350
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Carolina 5 Washington 1 Loss -140
Pittsburgh 4 Toronto 1 Win +130
Hot Forum Topics
