All Forums | Systems & Strategies

NHL B2B Fade

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 21733
Posts: 162
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 529
Posted: #51
No plays tonight!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 194
Posted: #52
Welcome rc
I'll continue to tail you

Don't let that moron get to you
GL
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 194
Posted: #53
I forgot to put welcome back!!!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 174
Posted: #54
Bunch of fucking n00bs. LOL
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 529
Posted: #55

Quote Originally Posted by Pick-Six:

Bunch of fucking n00bs. LOL

That being said from someone that just joined last month.  They definately need an ignore on here to block dick sux posts!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 306
Posted: #56
Not only is he a novice at the art of gambling, but to tell you the truth, the more he posts, the more I am convinced he is probably about 12 or 13 years old, because the only way he defends himself is by calling people names.  He can't man up and admit he is wrong.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 529
Posted: #57

Still trying to make this better.  I went thru the list and added in RPI, so we would only fade the road team if the home team had a higher RPI.  It took off alot of plays and only left 20.  Of the 20 the record was 14-6 so 70%  Up 5% from the original way.  So do we want more plays at 65% or less plays but better at 70%?  Tell me what you think?  I won't say which way I'm leaning yet.

This will also decide on tonights play.  NJ is at BUF.  If we play the original way then we will fade NJ tonight, however if we play the RPI way there will be no play because NJ has a higher RPI then BUF.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 306
Posted: #58
Right.  I think filters are a good idea.  I think what I will use is a graded unit scale.  If the home team has a lower RPI, and less than a .500 home win record, I will bet 1 unit.  If they have a lower RPI, but have at least a .500 home record, 2 units. Also 2 units if the home team has a higher RPI, but less than a .500 home record.  3 units if the home team has a higher RPI and at least a .500 record, and 4 units if the home team has all that, and the visiting team has less than a .500 road record.  Then I will throw this filter in.  No play on the 5 worst home record teams as of game time.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 306
Posted: #59
2 units on Buffalo for me.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 306
Posted: #60
Oh.  Money management.   Although the graded unit betting would be a bit tedious to Labouchere, it can be done.  Just have separate lines for the 1-unit bets, 2unit bets, and so on.

I haven't decided which way I'm going to go yet; flat betting would also work well here if the high win% holds up....that way you wouldn't get hit so hard if you lost 4 or 5 in a row.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 569
Posted: #61
I think just play more units on the ones that pass the RPI filter.  I am going to have 2 Labby lines, one for original and one for the RPI filtered plays.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 529
Posted: #62

Sounds good I will post the plays under original and RPI when they come up.

Todays Play

Original (28-15 65%)

Road-Road-Fade

NJ  (so bet BUF)

RPI Filter (14-6 70%)

No play

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 569
Posted: #63
Quote Originally Posted by RealityCheck1:

Sounds good I will post the plays under original and RPI when they come up.

Todays Play

Original (28-15 65%)

Road-Road-Fade

NJ  (so bet BUF)

RPI Filter (14-6 70%)

No play


Thanks RC
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1175
Posted: #64
RC, choosing which method to play has to depend on the average odds that each method provides. I'd rather play the 65% method at -110 average than the 70% at -140 average. Does the original average payout make up for the decreased accuracy? If they're basically the same then by all means filter out as many as possible.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 529
Posted: #65

For the losing home plays I calculated the average line.  For the original 15 losses, 3 were dogs and the average for the other 12 home losses is -148.

For the RPI 6 home losses the average is -155

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 529
Posted: #66

Record

Original (28-16 63%)

RPI Filter (14-6 70%)

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1175
Posted: #67
Quote Originally Posted by RealityCheck1:

For the losing home plays I calculated the average line.  For the original 15 losses, 3 were dogs and the average for the other 12 home losses is -148.

For the RPI 6 home losses the average is -155

Seems that it would be better to use the filter since the chalk is basically the same, huh?

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 529
Posted: #68

Todays Play

Original (28-16 63%)

Home-Road-Fade

MON (so bet NYI)

RPI Filter (14-6 70%)

No play

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 529
Posted: #69

NYI 

Record

Original (29-16 64%)

RPI Filter (14-6 70%)

 

 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 529
Posted: #70
No plays today!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 529
Posted: #71

Todays play

Original (29-16 64%)

Road-Road-Fade

CHI (so bet EDM)

RPI Filter (14-6 70%)

No play

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 306
Posted: #72
2 units on ED!
                    GL
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 529
Posted: #73

EDM

Todays play

Original (30-16 65%)

Road-Road-Fade

SJ (so bet COL)

Home-Road-Fade

TOR (so bet CAR)

RPI Filter (14-6 70%)

No play

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 569
Posted: #74
Quote Originally Posted by RealityCheck1:

EDM

Todays play

Original (30-16 65%)

Road-Road-Fade

SJ (so bet COL)

Home-Road-Fade

TOR (so bet CAR)

RPI Filter (14-6 70%)

No play


What is the reason that Anaheim is not a play since Detroit is playing B2B?  
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 1818
Posted: #75
This is a good record...will be watching this....BOL
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.