And I got PIT/WAS Over 5.5 lol
I think we need to find the criteria the linesmakers use in determing if the O/U would be a 5 or 6 and then on games that are close to being a 5 or 6 but are not would be an advantage.
Look at NJ/EDM tonight it's a 5. Now how do they come up with 5?
The last meeting was 7 goals total
The previous 4 meetings were all under 5 but that goes back to 2005 and teams are different now
NJ GF 2.8 EDM GF 2.4 so avg of 2.6 for 5.2 total
NJ GA 3.6 EDM GA 3.8 so avg of 3.7 each
And I got PIT/WAS Over 5.5 lol
I think we need to find the criteria the linesmakers use in determing if the O/U would be a 5 or 6 and then on games that are close to being a 5 or 6 but are not would be an advantage.
Look at NJ/EDM tonight it's a 5. Now how do they come up with 5?
The last meeting was 7 goals total
The previous 4 meetings were all under 5 but that goes back to 2005 and teams are different now
NJ GF 2.8 EDM GF 2.4 so avg of 2.6 for 5.2 total
NJ GA 3.6 EDM GA 3.8 so avg of 3.7 each
Of course we are on opposite sides. At least one of use will be right.
My method is close (considering its been a little over a week). More data is required to get an accurate assessment of it's value.
I am incorporating the GAA stats of each goalie for that game. I'm looking for any sort of trend to give us an advantage.
I would love to know what the sharps use to set lines on any game, but that is a closely guarded secret. Many speculate to the method, but I have yet to hear of anything definative.
Baseing a pick off previous meetings is never a good idea. The rotation of players, emotional state, and other intangibles make a repeat of those same events highly unlikely.
Filtering is by far the best method. Looking for that small window of games that give us the highest probability of winning. I couldn't care less if I won 100 or 10,000 as long as it consistant. Repeating it over and over again is far more valuable to me.
Of course we are on opposite sides. At least one of use will be right.
My method is close (considering its been a little over a week). More data is required to get an accurate assessment of it's value.
I am incorporating the GAA stats of each goalie for that game. I'm looking for any sort of trend to give us an advantage.
I would love to know what the sharps use to set lines on any game, but that is a closely guarded secret. Many speculate to the method, but I have yet to hear of anything definative.
Baseing a pick off previous meetings is never a good idea. The rotation of players, emotional state, and other intangibles make a repeat of those same events highly unlikely.
Filtering is by far the best method. Looking for that small window of games that give us the highest probability of winning. I couldn't care less if I won 100 or 10,000 as long as it consistant. Repeating it over and over again is far more valuable to me.
irage got a comp while on vac
the unders only have two losses ( one in the 0.01 second of the third) if the filter of 3 GAA is used.
For the overs i still havent been able to find any filter but still researching.
keep it up
irage got a comp while on vac
the unders only have two losses ( one in the 0.01 second of the third) if the filter of 3 GAA is used.
For the overs i still havent been able to find any filter but still researching.
keep it up
Here are the games I like today.
1/12 - Colorado 2.08 v Nashville 2.57 (1) UNDER 5.5 - PENDING
1/12 - Vancouver 2.30 v St. Louis 1.62 (4) UNDER 5.5 - PENDING
1/12 - Dallas 2.49 v Los Angeles 1.93 (5) UNDER 5.5 - PENDING
1/12 - San Jose 2.22 v Winnipeg 2.23 (33) OVER 5.5 - PENDING
1/12 - Ottawa 2.00 v NY Rangers 1.85 (34) OVER 5.5 - PENDING
These should be picks, but I am applying a new filter.
1/12 - Montreal v Boston (50) OVER 5.5 - PENDING
1/12 - Philadelphia v NY Islanders (43) OVER 5.5 - PENDING
These plays are off.
1/12 - Carolina v Tampa Bay (14)
1/12 - Phoenix v Detroit (19)
1/12 - Minnesota v Chicago (13)
1/12 - Anaheim v Calgary (23)
Here are the games I like today.
1/12 - Colorado 2.08 v Nashville 2.57 (1) UNDER 5.5 - PENDING
1/12 - Vancouver 2.30 v St. Louis 1.62 (4) UNDER 5.5 - PENDING
1/12 - Dallas 2.49 v Los Angeles 1.93 (5) UNDER 5.5 - PENDING
1/12 - San Jose 2.22 v Winnipeg 2.23 (33) OVER 5.5 - PENDING
1/12 - Ottawa 2.00 v NY Rangers 1.85 (34) OVER 5.5 - PENDING
These should be picks, but I am applying a new filter.
1/12 - Montreal v Boston (50) OVER 5.5 - PENDING
1/12 - Philadelphia v NY Islanders (43) OVER 5.5 - PENDING
These plays are off.
1/12 - Carolina v Tampa Bay (14)
1/12 - Phoenix v Detroit (19)
1/12 - Minnesota v Chicago (13)
1/12 - Anaheim v Calgary (23)
Correction: 3 games are at 5. I don't buy points.
1/12 - Colorado 2.08 v Nashville 2.57 (1) UNDER 5 - PENDING
1/12 - Vancouver 2.30 v St. Louis 1.62 (4) UNDER 5 - PENDING
1/12 - Dallas 2.49 v Los Angeles 1.93 (5) UNDER 5 - PENDING
1/12 - San Jose 2.22 v Winnipeg 2.23 (33) OVER 5.5 - PENDING
1/12 - Ottawa 2.00 v NY Rangers 1.85 (34) OVER 5.5 - PENDING
Correction: 3 games are at 5. I don't buy points.
1/12 - Colorado 2.08 v Nashville 2.57 (1) UNDER 5 - PENDING
1/12 - Vancouver 2.30 v St. Louis 1.62 (4) UNDER 5 - PENDING
1/12 - Dallas 2.49 v Los Angeles 1.93 (5) UNDER 5 - PENDING
1/12 - San Jose 2.22 v Winnipeg 2.23 (33) OVER 5.5 - PENDING
1/12 - Ottawa 2.00 v NY Rangers 1.85 (34) OVER 5.5 - PENDING
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.