All Forums | Systems & Strategies

NHL Totals system

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 15555
Posts: 136
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 5921
Posted: #76
I may need to find a place in Vegas that offers the alt line. Pretty sure my online/mobile apps for Cantor and Station casinos do not offer it.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 222
Posted: #77
Okay so far this year, the most games in a row that went over 6/6.5 was 4 and it happened only twice. Small sample size but thats what i got so far
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 222
Posted: #78
The 2 teams that lost 4 in a row this year were the NyIslanders and Nashville btw
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 1908
Posted: #79
What I've been trying, is playing the under (5.0,5.5). Only with teams scoring under the league average of 5.51. This eliminates the high scoring teams, although they may match up with a low scoring team. The 1st play of the chase starts with  U6.5 or U 6.0, after  that it is U5.5 or U 5.0. If a chase is getting too hefty, units are shaved off and redistributed among other plays. This may reduce the action, but the odds of winning appear better so far. The Rangers have three overs in a row, the most so far while trying this. They appear to have gone from an under team to an over team over night. May have to eliminate them from the list if they continue there high scoring ways. So this list is flexible if the stats are pointing to change. If time permits I would like to look at the number of match-ups between low scoring teams only and the results, to see if there is some kind of correlation and the winning percentage.

This is early days, so lots of time to see if the results pan out. I'm keeping units low until I feel absolutely confident in the system. In the mean time, its fun and games. Keep your wagering entertaining and don't let it eat your soul or your bankroll.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 1447
Posted: #80
For all the line numbers, a push meant the game didn't happen, and is not in any of the records...just easier to do my formulas.

82 games but 5 pushed would look like this 77-0. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 222
Posted: #81
Rangers have 3 overs in a row? Way more teams have lost 3 in a row overs this year...more like 7 teams. 2 have lost 4 in a row but no more then that.

Did u mean teams with a low scoring average of below 5.51? If so i apoligize for misunderstanding

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1033
Posted: #82
0-1 today. Line was 5.0.
Great work on the back testing and ideas.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 1908
Posted: #83
Yes, teams below the league average 5.51. No need for apologies. my english is poor.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1033
Posted: #84
Great day today. I've got results as 7-2-2
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 5921
Posted: #85

Quote Originally Posted by rivermonsterz:

Great day today. I've got results as 7-2-2

That was much needed after some of the other losses. I got killed today in OT/SO games.

Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 76
Posted: #86
so basically betting to clear four numbers from your labby lines, two numbers from each team or 1 # off your line from each line per team? Curious how you running your labby lines for this? 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1033
Posted: #87
It was much needed. Profited about 12-13 units today.
Since the 7th profit is about 5 units. Will continue to track from this date
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 76
Posted: #88
I have my labby lines set up as: 

tor: 5 5 5 5 
min 5 5 5 5 
dal 5 5 5 5 
edm 5 5 5 5 
phi 5 5 5 5 
pit 5 5 5 5 

so betting to clear two numbers per team correct? Each line represents 1 unit, so betting 1/2 unit per team which makes the total game starting 1u.  This look right? 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 3343
Posted: #89
I know this system is self explanatory but I am reading you guys have a different thing going for each team...can you share the details?  What are tonight's plays/unit sizes?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 5921
Posted: #90
Quote Originally Posted by System_Grind3r:

I have my labby lines set up as: 

tor: 5 5 5 5 
min 5 5 5 5 
dal 5 5 5 5 
edm 5 5 5 5 
phi 5 5 5 5 
pit 5 5 5 5 

so betting to clear two numbers per team correct? Each line represents 1 unit, so betting 1/2 unit per team which makes the total game starting 1u.  This look right? 

Yes looks right, except each line would be 2 units (4 x .5 unit). They way you have it shows that your unit betting size is $10. So if Tor was playing Edm, the bet would be to win $20.

Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 76
Posted: #91
Quote Originally Posted by Danrules24:

Yes looks right, except each line would be 2 units (4 x .5 unit). They way you have it shows that your unit betting size is $10. So if Tor was playing Edm, the bet would be to win $20.


I did not want my lines to get too heavy or be betting 2u a game as a starting point until I have some cushion with this system. Setting it up this way will allow me to have 1u on each game today instead of 2.

Because there is one line for each team I think it is more of a cross 4#s off when you win (two from each team) and add two numbers when there is a loss 1 # for each team. Just split the risk for both lines. 

Any other systems you following DAN? 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 3343
Posted: #92
I like this system...very simple.  I took all unders and they all hit! 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 76
Posted: #93
Quote Originally Posted by GreenMachine22:

I like this system...very simple.  I took all unders and they all hit! 

Why didn't you take the o5? 


I am really going to grind this system out. I am just trying to figure out which way to shift my numbers when they get above 5#s on a line. Which teams do you shift your labby #s to when its above 5#s on a line? 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 3343
Posted: #94
I read a lot today about hockey totals and subsequently had 'unders' on the mind, so I just took all unders tonight.  I almost took the Total Goals Scored U/16 but decided to just stick to the system.  Hind-sight's always 20/20
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1033
Posted: #95
Thats a good question grind3r!

Todays results 2-1.


 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 5921
Posted: #96
When I shift numbers, I spread it out to teams that are down to one number of original unit size, have less than 4 numbers of the original unit size and/or 4 numbers of the original unit size. I do not add to any team that has a number higher than the original unit size or one that is beyond 4 numbers in the line. Hope that makes sense.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 76
Posted: #97
Anyone have a break down of winning and losing days? I am curious to the variance of this system. It will be kinda hard to backtest and make a graph for this season based on labby variations. Would definitely be very time consuming based on the labby. martingale be pretty easy to backtest for this season. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 76
Posted: #98
Anyone have a link to a martingale chase of this? I think it will be super profitable doing like 1/4 of a unit and doing like a six game chase. For example if your unit size was $20 you would chase $5 for each team for six games. Just wish my book allowed me bet that small lol. 

if juice is -125 on average
A) $6.25 to win $5
B) $14.06 to win $11.25
C)$31.64  to win $25.31 
D) $71.19 to win $56.95 ($123.14)
E) $160.18  to win $128.14
F) $360.40  to win $288.32


Again its a lot of risk, but martingale makes it easy and if your cutting your unit size in 1/4 you are actually only losing $643.72 on a six game chase which is 32 regular units. Would have to win 128 series to make up for that loss. I look forward to back testing this in the future. 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1033
Posted: #99
not great today.
2-4-1.
Net profit for the day: -5.48 units
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 222
Posted: #100
Quote Originally Posted by System_Grind3r:

Anyone have a link to a martingale chase of this? I think it will be super profitable doing like 1/4 of a unit and doing like a six game chase. For example if your unit size was $20 you would chase $5 for each team for six games. Just wish my book allowed me bet that small lol. 

if juice is -125 on average
A) $6.25 to win $5
B) $14.06 to win $11.25
C)$31.64  to win $25.31 
D) $71.19 to win $56.95 ($123.14)
E) $160.18  to win $128.14
F) $360.40  to win $288.32


Again its a lot of risk, but martingale makes it easy and if your cutting your unit size in 1/4 you are actually only losing $643.72 on a six game chase which is 32 regular units. Would have to win 128 series to make up for that loss. I look forward to back testing this in the future. 


Interested to see the results!
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.