Monday plays: Texas and LA Dodgers on the A game. Tuesday looks like Detroit and KC. 3 home teams and the LAD on the road in Miami.
Record: 96-6
A: 63-39
B: 22-17
C: 11-6
Monday plays: Texas and LA Dodgers on the A game. Tuesday looks like Detroit and KC. 3 home teams and the LAD on the road in Miami.
Record: 96-6
A: 63-39
B: 22-17
C: 11-6
I just ran the numbers taking the home team AGAINST the target visitor RPI superior team. I took out the interleague series that were 2 home, 2 away. Taking the run line on the home team if a dog would have resulted in a 33-2 record. One series went to a game 4.
So 33-2 vs playing it the regular way of targeting the better team on the road record of 39-5. The difference in number of plays is the home and home interleague series and any double dips from the target team winning the A game in a 4 game series, prompting another play.
I'm not going to play it this way as I think this years record of system losses is a fluke. Just thought it was interesting.
I just ran the numbers taking the home team AGAINST the target visitor RPI superior team. I took out the interleague series that were 2 home, 2 away. Taking the run line on the home team if a dog would have resulted in a 33-2 record. One series went to a game 4.
So 33-2 vs playing it the regular way of targeting the better team on the road record of 39-5. The difference in number of plays is the home and home interleague series and any double dips from the target team winning the A game in a 4 game series, prompting another play.
I'm not going to play it this way as I think this years record of system losses is a fluke. Just thought it was interesting.
Record 33-2
Record 33-2
I just ran the numbers taking the home team AGAINST the target visitor RPI superior team. I took out the interleague series that were 2 home, 2 away. Taking the run line on the home team if a dog would have resulted in a 33-2 record. One series went to a game 4.
So 33-2 vs playing it the regular way of targeting the better team on the road record of 39-5. The difference in number of plays is the home and home interleague series and any double dips from the target team winning the A game in a 4 game series, prompting another play.
I'm not going to play it this way as I think this years record of system losses is a fluke. Just thought it was interesting.
I just ran the numbers taking the home team AGAINST the target visitor RPI superior team. I took out the interleague series that were 2 home, 2 away. Taking the run line on the home team if a dog would have resulted in a 33-2 record. One series went to a game 4.
So 33-2 vs playing it the regular way of targeting the better team on the road record of 39-5. The difference in number of plays is the home and home interleague series and any double dips from the target team winning the A game in a 4 game series, prompting another play.
I'm not going to play it this way as I think this years record of system losses is a fluke. Just thought it was interesting.
Monday results: Texas wins. LAD lose on A game, to B game Tuesday.
Tuesday looks like Detroit and KC also on the A game.
Record: 97-6
A: 64-40
B: 22-17
C: 11-6
Monday results: Texas wins. LAD lose on A game, to B game Tuesday.
Tuesday looks like Detroit and KC also on the A game.
Record: 97-6
A: 64-40
B: 22-17
C: 11-6
Tuesday for this system LAD is a play on the B game, Det and KC on the A game.
As for KC/CWS, The Magna Carta system says to play the opposite of this system. That will happen sometimes. I'm taking KC to win one of 3 at home vs CWS. Maybe lay off the first game and chase the opposite of game one? I feel better betting on the better team at home. No Chris Sale in the series either.
Tuesday for this system LAD is a play on the B game, Det and KC on the A game.
As for KC/CWS, The Magna Carta system says to play the opposite of this system. That will happen sometimes. I'm taking KC to win one of 3 at home vs CWS. Maybe lay off the first game and chase the opposite of game one? I feel better betting on the better team at home. No Chris Sale in the series either.
Tuesday results: LAD win on the B game. Detroit and KC lose on the A game, go to B game Wednesday.
Record: 98-6
A: 64-42
B: 23-17
C: 11-6
Tuesday results: LAD win on the B game. Detroit and KC lose on the A game, go to B game Wednesday.
Record: 98-6
A: 64-42
B: 23-17
C: 11-6
Wednesday results: Detroit wins on the B game. KC loses on the B game, go to C game Thursday. Our 18th C game of the year. Incredible.
Record: 99-6
A: 64-42
B: 24-18
C: 11-6
Wednesday results: Detroit wins on the B game. KC loses on the B game, go to C game Thursday. Our 18th C game of the year. Incredible.
Record: 99-6
A: 64-42
B: 24-18
C: 11-6
What I personally got was -180, -170, -170. You probably could have gotten better shopping around or offshore.
What I personally got was -180, -170, -170. You probably could have gotten better shopping around or offshore.
Another system loss. Thanks to KC Mgr Ned Yost who apparently doesn't believe in bunting. How do you have 1st and 2nd, nobody out and not bunt the winning run to 3rd? Worse case is they walk the next batter to load them up for Butler. Again in the 12th, guy on 2nd and nobody out and you don't bunt the tying run to third?
Personally I'm done betting this system this year. I'll continue to post and good luck to all that play.
Record: 99-7
A: 64-42
B: 24-18
C: 11-7
Another system loss. Thanks to KC Mgr Ned Yost who apparently doesn't believe in bunting. How do you have 1st and 2nd, nobody out and not bunt the winning run to 3rd? Worse case is they walk the next batter to load them up for Butler. Again in the 12th, guy on 2nd and nobody out and you don't bunt the tying run to third?
Personally I'm done betting this system this year. I'll continue to post and good luck to all that play.
Record: 99-7
A: 64-42
B: 24-18
C: 11-7
Another system loss. Thanks to KC Mgr Ned Yost who apparently doesn't believe in bunting. How do you have 1st and 2nd, nobody out and not bunt the winning run to 3rd? Worse case is they walk the next batter to load them up for Butler. Again in the 12th, guy on 2nd and nobody out and you don't bunt the tying run to third?
Personally I'm done betting this system this year. I'll continue to post and good luck to all that play.
Record: 99-7
A: 64-42
B: 24-18
C: 11-7
Another system loss. Thanks to KC Mgr Ned Yost who apparently doesn't believe in bunting. How do you have 1st and 2nd, nobody out and not bunt the winning run to 3rd? Worse case is they walk the next batter to load them up for Butler. Again in the 12th, guy on 2nd and nobody out and you don't bunt the tying run to third?
Personally I'm done betting this system this year. I'll continue to post and good luck to all that play.
Record: 99-7
A: 64-42
B: 24-18
C: 11-7
For those still interested, A games on Cincy (home against Mil) and Texas (at CWS).
Record: 99-7
A: 64-42
B: 24-18
C: 11-7
For those still interested, A games on Cincy (home against Mil) and Texas (at CWS).
Record: 99-7
A: 64-42
B: 24-18
C: 11-7
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.