Don't know about you guys, but there will be no D game for me in the Reds series. I hate unders to begin with and not about to risk a month of winners on one bet.
I hear yea bro! Not sure yet myself, if I don't bet it, definitely will go under!
0
Quote Originally Posted by bruin95:
Don't know about you guys, but there will be no D game for me in the Reds series. I hate unders to begin with and not about to risk a month of winners on one bet.
I hear yea bro! Not sure yet myself, if I don't bet it, definitely will go under!
Well there you have it guys...you win some, you lose some. Dusty Baker's a dumb fuck and cost us this one for sure, shoulda pulled Latos...oh well. Onwards and upwards.
0
Well there you have it guys...you win some, you lose some. Dusty Baker's a dumb fuck and cost us this one for sure, shoulda pulled Latos...oh well. Onwards and upwards.
I think, far as I can tell from this thread, the system is 12-1. The four game Cincy chase basically wiped out all the profit from the 12 wins. 12 wins at $100, minus the four martingale chase actually puts me down a little juice. Lets hope moving forward from Monday we get back on the profit train, I enjoy this low juice system.
0
I think, far as I can tell from this thread, the system is 12-1. The four game Cincy chase basically wiped out all the profit from the 12 wins. 12 wins at $100, minus the four martingale chase actually puts me down a little juice. Lets hope moving forward from Monday we get back on the profit train, I enjoy this low juice system.
I think, far as I can tell from this thread, the system is 12-1. The four game Cincy chase basically wiped out all the profit from the 12 wins. 12 wins at $100, minus the four martingale chase actually puts me down a little juice. Lets hope moving forward from Monday we get back on the profit train, I enjoy this low juice system.
I appreciate you sticking around. I feel terrible thinking I cost people real money.
I got thinking...maybe we're being too greedy. I personally HATE losing systems....I'm a perfectionist, I want perfect haha. We should only be taking the strong teams. Less plays, but less worrys. Take teams like Philly where they'd literally had an over in EVERY series this season. Then again this is still young so maybe it's a shit system. Don't know yet.
As for the record, original "overall season" is 17-1 since I started tracking. Home vs. Road record is 11-1. Let's hunker down and crush this.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigTenWatto:
I think, far as I can tell from this thread, the system is 12-1. The four game Cincy chase basically wiped out all the profit from the 12 wins. 12 wins at $100, minus the four martingale chase actually puts me down a little juice. Lets hope moving forward from Monday we get back on the profit train, I enjoy this low juice system.
I appreciate you sticking around. I feel terrible thinking I cost people real money.
I got thinking...maybe we're being too greedy. I personally HATE losing systems....I'm a perfectionist, I want perfect haha. We should only be taking the strong teams. Less plays, but less worrys. Take teams like Philly where they'd literally had an over in EVERY series this season. Then again this is still young so maybe it's a shit system. Don't know yet.
As for the record, original "overall season" is 17-1 since I started tracking. Home vs. Road record is 11-1. Let's hunker down and crush this.
I got thinking...maybe we're being too greedy. I personally HATE losing systems....I'm a perfectionist, I want perfect haha. We should only be taking the strong teams. Less plays, but less worrys. Take teams like Philly where they'd literally had an over in EVERY series this season. Then again this is still young so maybe it's a shit system. Don't know yet.
I was thinking along the same lines... looking at the Rockies/Mets, the Rockies are a solid 55% over (over all) but on the road they're 54% under. If these numbers are right, it might be a series to steer clear of.
0
Quote Originally Posted by CannedGoods:
I got thinking...maybe we're being too greedy. I personally HATE losing systems....I'm a perfectionist, I want perfect haha. We should only be taking the strong teams. Less plays, but less worrys. Take teams like Philly where they'd literally had an over in EVERY series this season. Then again this is still young so maybe it's a shit system. Don't know yet.
I was thinking along the same lines... looking at the Rockies/Mets, the Rockies are a solid 55% over (over all) but on the road they're 54% under. If these numbers are right, it might be a series to steer clear of.
Well, I don't even feel like posting plays (yes I'm that upset haha), but I will for anyone still following. Plus I believe by still tracking, we can add some filters in that will help avoid future losses. "Overall Season" (V1; 21-1 YTD): KC (56.1%) @ TB (60.2%) A-U BAL (55.3%) @ TEX (54.8%) A-U COL (55%) @ NYM (59.3%) A-O "Park Factors" (V2;12-1 YTD): KC (57.1%) @ TB (66.7%) A-U BAL (60.3%) @ TEX (55.6%) A-U
Unofficial: NYY (57.8%) @ CHW (52.6%) - The Yankees are perfect on the year for unders, I'm guessing that trend continues here against the relatively strong under hitting team in the White Sox.
BOL for those who play.
0
Well, I don't even feel like posting plays (yes I'm that upset haha), but I will for anyone still following. Plus I believe by still tracking, we can add some filters in that will help avoid future losses. "Overall Season" (V1; 21-1 YTD): KC (56.1%) @ TB (60.2%) A-U BAL (55.3%) @ TEX (54.8%) A-U COL (55%) @ NYM (59.3%) A-O "Park Factors" (V2;12-1 YTD): KC (57.1%) @ TB (66.7%) A-U BAL (60.3%) @ TEX (55.6%) A-U
Unofficial: NYY (57.8%) @ CHW (52.6%) - The Yankees are perfect on the year for unders, I'm guessing that trend continues here against the relatively strong under hitting team in the White Sox.
Easy search. Twice in July, both 3 GM series, Ariz & in Wash, three unders for the Rockies
I plan on playing it. Mets are perfect on the year (they had one series with 3 unders against Miami but I don't count it bc it happened in April and we don't make any plays in April).
0
Quote Originally Posted by hardyvault:
Easy search. Twice in July, both 3 GM series, Ariz & in Wash, three unders for the Rockies
I plan on playing it. Mets are perfect on the year (they had one series with 3 unders against Miami but I don't count it bc it happened in April and we don't make any plays in April).
With all due respect, the loss suffered, this past weekend, pretty much wiped out all the profits made up to date. The system bounced backed nicely with 3 winners this week, and that's basically the profit so far. To say that the system is "money in the bank" would not be an accurate statement at this point. It's still a work in progress. The one major problem with chase systems is that a single loss can wipe out everything that has been accomplished up to that point. Just like what happened a few days ago.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigTenWatto:
This system continues to be money in the bank.
With all due respect, the loss suffered, this past weekend, pretty much wiped out all the profits made up to date. The system bounced backed nicely with 3 winners this week, and that's basically the profit so far. To say that the system is "money in the bank" would not be an accurate statement at this point. It's still a work in progress. The one major problem with chase systems is that a single loss can wipe out everything that has been accomplished up to that point. Just like what happened a few days ago.
Anyone still paying attention to this? I have TB/Tex u8.5 tonight.
Hey boss. Appreciate you keeping up with this. I'm done with chases. I lost 1/3 of my BR on the D-Backs getting swept by the Padres (again). Gonna cap individual games, irage style. Working on a new MLB totals strategy, haven't come up with anything yet tho...
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigTenWatto:
Anyone still paying attention to this? I have TB/Tex u8.5 tonight.
Hey boss. Appreciate you keeping up with this. I'm done with chases. I lost 1/3 of my BR on the D-Backs getting swept by the Padres (again). Gonna cap individual games, irage style. Working on a new MLB totals strategy, haven't come up with anything yet tho...
Hey CG, just wanted to thank you for uncovering this system. I'm still playing it, winning 5 to 8 series a week, while not being too greedy. After the Reds series, I went back and found some helpful filters that seem to be working for now. (kept me off the A's last week)
Continued success, bruddah, thanks again.
0
Hey CG, just wanted to thank you for uncovering this system. I'm still playing it, winning 5 to 8 series a week, while not being too greedy. After the Reds series, I went back and found some helpful filters that seem to be working for now. (kept me off the A's last week)
Hey CannedGoods, I went back and tracked each team for O/U home and away. My idea was to wait until May to bet and stop at the end of August. Starting May, only bet if both teams has a % of 54 or higher. Example Wash at the Mets - If Wash was 55% over on the road, the Mets would need to be 54% or higher over at home. If both meet the criteria, chase a 3 or 4 game series. If a 4 game series and A game wins, do NOT start a new 3 game chase with the last 3 games. A push on A game cancels the play. A push on B game still a play for final game, just reduces to a 2 game chase.
After more data was compiled, starting June 1 if one team met the 54% mark the other team only needed to be above 50% (exactly 50% is no play).
Started with the series on 5/1 and ended with last series that started 9/3. Results were 180 wins and 11 losses with 2 losses being two game chases (rained out or a Push involved). With the low juice, up 95.92 units.
Using $25 as a unit, was up $2398.25 with the largest bet being $345.25 on D game of a 4 game chase (only D game all year). The 3 game chase losses were usually around a $220 to $250 hit.
I also checked to see if you bet to win $100 on each game, not a chase, just a straight $100 with low juice and move on after a win just as you would a chase. Overall record of 180-130-4. Even if each loss was -120, you still would have been at $2400 profit on the year. Since most games were at -110 or -115, betting to win a $100 each game would have been a bit better.
A: 102-89
B:56-31-2
C:21-10-2
D:1-0
Can't wait to try this next baseball season.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Hey CannedGoods, I went back and tracked each team for O/U home and away. My idea was to wait until May to bet and stop at the end of August. Starting May, only bet if both teams has a % of 54 or higher. Example Wash at the Mets - If Wash was 55% over on the road, the Mets would need to be 54% or higher over at home. If both meet the criteria, chase a 3 or 4 game series. If a 4 game series and A game wins, do NOT start a new 3 game chase with the last 3 games. A push on A game cancels the play. A push on B game still a play for final game, just reduces to a 2 game chase.
After more data was compiled, starting June 1 if one team met the 54% mark the other team only needed to be above 50% (exactly 50% is no play).
Started with the series on 5/1 and ended with last series that started 9/3. Results were 180 wins and 11 losses with 2 losses being two game chases (rained out or a Push involved). With the low juice, up 95.92 units.
Using $25 as a unit, was up $2398.25 with the largest bet being $345.25 on D game of a 4 game chase (only D game all year). The 3 game chase losses were usually around a $220 to $250 hit.
I also checked to see if you bet to win $100 on each game, not a chase, just a straight $100 with low juice and move on after a win just as you would a chase. Overall record of 180-130-4. Even if each loss was -120, you still would have been at $2400 profit on the year. Since most games were at -110 or -115, betting to win a $100 each game would have been a bit better.
Was wondering if you were using this system this season and, if so, with what results. The back testing you did looked promising. Thought about using this system myself but wasn't sure if the system had been optimized and/or didn't back test well beyond last season.
Special thanks to you and degen for the work you put in, especially keeping the rpi chase alive.
0
Danrules,
Was wondering if you were using this system this season and, if so, with what results. The back testing you did looked promising. Thought about using this system myself but wasn't sure if the system had been optimized and/or didn't back test well beyond last season.
Special thanks to you and degen for the work you put in, especially keeping the rpi chase alive.
Was wondering if you were using this system this season and, if so, with what results. The back testing you did looked promising. Thought about using this system myself but wasn't sure if the system had been optimized and/or didn't back test well beyond last season.
Special thanks to you and degen for the work you put in, especially keeping the rpi chase alive.
I am doing this O/U system and it's 16-0 since the start of May. Was thinking of posting these plays starting Monday. There are 2 C games today.
Traveling today but I will comment further later tonight.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Quote Originally Posted by ssquerd:
Danrules,
Was wondering if you were using this system this season and, if so, with what results. The back testing you did looked promising. Thought about using this system myself but wasn't sure if the system had been optimized and/or didn't back test well beyond last season.
Special thanks to you and degen for the work you put in, especially keeping the rpi chase alive.
I am doing this O/U system and it's 16-0 since the start of May. Was thinking of posting these plays starting Monday. There are 2 C games today.
Traveling today but I will comment further later tonight.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
