Always liked HappyKane as well.
No offense Kreatture, but I think your assesment of my system sounded a little condescending. The size of the units I am playing are irrelevant. I starting playing 1% ($10) of my bankroll which may be chump change to you but the amount played can easily be adjusted and it makes it easier to follow the units listed. I have painstakingly listed the historical data for the last 4 seasons by playing on the RL, ML and/or using the over/under filter of 9 or higher. Home teams using the filter are 80-1, with the only loss coming from the disasterous texas series. Those that follow, should understand how to interpret the labby lines are how much to play depending on which way they are playing it. All the plays are listed to allow variety. Playing just the 80-1 subset of plays would put you at lower risk but those that want to be more aggressive will play all the series with confidence the labby lines will pay them back. We had a rough week before the all star game losing 3 series and have claimed back nearly all of our units. There are other potential filters being tested as it is the first year playing this.
What I do agree with you on is that this is not the system to try to significantly pump up your bankroll in one month, as you never know when the ups and downs will come.
I do know of a tout I have followed all mlb season who is very inexpensive and hits around 65% with only one week that was negative money that I can remember. If you PM me your email I will let you know his name and send you his plays to check them out.
Also agree with those touting Mr Z and Target 9
No offense Kreatture, but I think your assesment of my system sounded a little condescending. The size of the units I am playing are irrelevant. I starting playing 1% ($10) of my bankroll which may be chump change to you but the amount played can easily be adjusted and it makes it easier to follow the units listed. I have painstakingly listed the historical data for the last 4 seasons by playing on the RL, ML and/or using the over/under filter of 9 or higher. Home teams using the filter are 80-1, with the only loss coming from the disasterous texas series. Those that follow, should understand how to interpret the labby lines are how much to play depending on which way they are playing it. All the plays are listed to allow variety. Playing just the 80-1 subset of plays would put you at lower risk but those that want to be more aggressive will play all the series with confidence the labby lines will pay them back. We had a rough week before the all star game losing 3 series and have claimed back nearly all of our units. There are other potential filters being tested as it is the first year playing this.
What I do agree with you on is that this is not the system to try to significantly pump up your bankroll in one month, as you never know when the ups and downs will come.
I do know of a tout I have followed all mlb season who is very inexpensive and hits around 65% with only one week that was negative money that I can remember. If you PM me your email I will let you know his name and send you his plays to check them out.
Also agree with those touting Mr Z and Target 9
No offense Kreatture, but I think your assesment of my system sounded a little condescending. The size of the units I am playing are irrelevant. I starting playing 1% ($10) of my bankroll which may be chump change to you but the amount played can easily be adjusted and it makes it easier to follow the units listed. I have painstakingly listed the historical data for the last 4 seasons by playing on the RL, ML and/or using the over/under filter of 9 or higher. Home teams using the filter are 80-1, with the only loss coming from the disasterous texas series. Those that follow, should understand how to interpret the labby lines are how much to play depending on which way they are playing it. All the plays are listed to allow variety. Playing just the 80-1 subset of plays would put you at lower risk but those that want to be more aggressive will play all the series with confidence the labby lines will pay them back. We had a rough week before the all star game losing 3 series and have claimed back nearly all of our units. There are other potential filters being tested as it is the first year playing this.
What I do agree with you on is that this is not the system to try to significantly pump up your bankroll in one month, as you never know when the ups and downs will come.
I do know of a tout I have followed all mlb season who is very inexpensive and hits around 65% with only one week that was negative money that I can remember. If you PM me your email I will let you know his name and send you his plays to check them out.
Also agree with those touting Mr Z and Target 9
No offense Kreatture, but I think your assesment of my system sounded a little condescending. The size of the units I am playing are irrelevant. I starting playing 1% ($10) of my bankroll which may be chump change to you but the amount played can easily be adjusted and it makes it easier to follow the units listed. I have painstakingly listed the historical data for the last 4 seasons by playing on the RL, ML and/or using the over/under filter of 9 or higher. Home teams using the filter are 80-1, with the only loss coming from the disasterous texas series. Those that follow, should understand how to interpret the labby lines are how much to play depending on which way they are playing it. All the plays are listed to allow variety. Playing just the 80-1 subset of plays would put you at lower risk but those that want to be more aggressive will play all the series with confidence the labby lines will pay them back. We had a rough week before the all star game losing 3 series and have claimed back nearly all of our units. There are other potential filters being tested as it is the first year playing this.
What I do agree with you on is that this is not the system to try to significantly pump up your bankroll in one month, as you never know when the ups and downs will come.
I do know of a tout I have followed all mlb season who is very inexpensive and hits around 65% with only one week that was negative money that I can remember. If you PM me your email I will let you know his name and send you his plays to check them out.
Also agree with those touting Mr Z and Target 9
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.