All Forums | Systems & Strategies

Post All-Star Home System

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 193779
Posts: 1194
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 1332
Posted: #451
So....How many units is this system down?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 538
Posted: #452
Quote Originally Posted by hawk007:

So....How many units is this system down?

Don't know how many units the Texas series would've costed had you played a 6- game chase. Probably in the ballpark of 150-200. But I doubt anyone played it like that.

I'm personally up 6 units with the betting structure I outline earlier. I would really recommend it. 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2001
Posts: 845
Posted: #453
Game 1  -164
Game 2  -125
Game 3  -129
Game 4  -121
Game 5  -160
Game 6  -134

Do the math. It ain't pretty.

GL

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 5921
Posted: #454
How is anyone not profiting off this system?
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2001
Posts: 845
Posted: #455
Depends if one went the distance last week with Texas. If you cut off after game 2,3 or 4, you are still fine. If you went to the mat with the system, you are singing a different tune. A dollar player was up about 3K before the implosion.

GL
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 256
Posted: #456
Is anyone going for all four game 1 plays today? 
TEXAS, ATLANTA, CINNCINATI  and PITTSBURGH.

GL
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 256
Posted: #457
Sorry, ST Louis not Pittsburgh.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 1017
Posted: #458
Quote Originally Posted by conrad63:

Is anyone going for all four game 1 plays today? 
TEXAS, ATLANTA, CINNCINATI  and PITTSBURGH.

GL


Since the Braves just won the division, I may wait to see what kind of lineup they throw out there. They do have a 1.5-game lead for the best record so still do have something to play for.  As for the others, I'll be on them.  I'm sure the Rangers will once again work their magic.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 1017
Posted: #459
Rangers, Reds and Cardinals all clear out. Braves on Game 2, then Orioles for Game 1.  That will do it for this season, which won't be profitable for some due to the Rangers.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 1017
Posted: #460
Well, that will do it for the season as the Orioles clear on Game 2.

Unfortunately, the system endured its first loss since I started tracking in 1999.

2013 season:
Record: 37-1
Game 1 wins -- 23
Game 2 wins -- 11
Game 3 wins --  1
Game 4 wins --  2

The overall record stands at 488-1.
Game 1 wins -- 290
Game 2 wins -- 139
Game 3 wins --  43
Game 4 wins --  10
Game 5 wins --  4
Game 6 wins --  1

There always are tweaks to made, ways to manage your money and learn as you go. For me, I'll never endure a six-game chase even though that's what the system says. Depending on how I'm doing, I'll reinvest my money elsewhere or cut teams earlier.  I cut Texas after four games.  Hopefullly, no one got destroyed with them.

In the last three seasons, the system has produced 84 wins, with 82 of them in the first three games.  Perhaps that's the way to go in the future, just cut things after three games.  You would've lost twice there but things would've been OK.

I'm always open to suggestions for the future on how to improve. If anyone has advice, let's hear it.

Thanks to everyone who participated and kept the bashing out of the thread. We all rant, including myself quite often which makes things fun from time to time.

Best of luck to everyone moving forward.

Chris



 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2014
Posts: 52
Posted: #461
I recommend people just chasing 2 games. In 2013 this system went 34/38 = 89%. Overall this system is 429/489 = 88%

Why in the world would some play roulette like that when you can just take the win on game A or B and if the system somehow finds its way to C back off and dip for A or B which you have GREAT odds to win.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #462
Quote Originally Posted by DeFacto:

I recommend people just chasing 2 games. In 2013 this system went 34/38 = 89%. Overall this system is 429/489 = 88%

Why in the world would some play roulette like that when you can just take the win on game A or B and if the system somehow finds its way to C back off and dip for A or B which you have GREAT odds to win.

If you do that it's 34-11 still 75.5% but I'm sure the ave. was at least 
-160  which doesn't leave much profit. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1033
Posted: #463
Yes but if you split your loss and transfer half of it to the next A game due up you should be okay right?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 5921
Posted: #464
Coming soon........
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 423
Posted: #465
can't wait!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2001
Posts: 378
Posted: #466
We won't have to worry about the Rangers being part of the system this season.  Ha Ha.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2001
Posts: 378
Posted: #467
Looking over the standings, only 2 teams are locks to qualify (Oakland, Detroit).  The Angels, Dodgers, Giants, and Cardinals would all have to win these next 2 games to qualify,  The Brewers and Orioles have to win one of the remaining two games to qualify.  Since the Cards and Brewers are playing each other, only one will qualify.  There's a very good possibility that there could only be 3 teams to qualify this season after having a record number of teams qualify last season.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 1506
Posted: #468
Angels are a lock, 19 games above .500......lets roll guys. Thanks Chris........
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2001
Posts: 378
Posted: #469

Quote Originally Posted by kenkean89:

Angels are a lock, 19 games above .500......lets roll guys. Thanks Chris........

 

Yeah, for whatever reason, I read their record to be 8 games over, not 18.  In my defense, it was late at night.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2001
Posts: 378
Posted: #470

So here are this years qualifiers:

Oakland, LA Angels, LA Dodgers, Detroit, Milwaukee (thread lightly folks) and Baltimore pending.  If they win they're in. 

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 1017
Posted: #471
Quote Originally Posted by bruin95:

So here are this years qualifiers:

Oakland, LA Angels, LA Dodgers, Detroit, Milwaukee (thread lightly folks) and Baltimore pending.  If they win they're in. 

 


100 percent agree about Brewers.  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 18
Posted: #472

Guys, you would not had a loss in this system last year with TEAXS...if you dont start a chase against another team that is 10+ games over .500

something to think about?

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2001
Posts: 845
Posted: #473
While this is true, you would have eliminated a number of wins over the 15 years that this system has been tracked. If you look closely at the 6 games that Texas lost last year, Darvish lost two 1-0 games, and a third game was lost because of Nathan coughing up a lead in the ninth...some things never change. The law of averages were against always winning. If two teams can pull out six wins at Texas like Oakland and Pittsburgh did last year, tip your hat and move on. While it was painful, it reinforces the fact that no system is 100% accurate.

GL
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 528
Posted: #474
Quote Originally Posted by Luckydan:

While this is true, you would have eliminated a number of wins over the 15 years that this system has been tracked. If you look closely at the 6 games that Texas lost last year, Darvish lost two 1-0 games, and a third game was lost because of Nathan coughing up a lead in the ninth...some things never change. The law of averages were against always winning. If two teams can pull out six wins at Texas like Oakland and Pittsburgh did last year, tip your hat and move on. While it was painful, it reinforces the fact that no system is 100% accurate.

GL

Beautifully said and agree completely..

While it is always important to go back over notes or look at how to avoid a similar loss in a system... sometimes, you just gotta say they were too good this time..
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2000
Posts: 100
Posted: #475

Okay, this is what I have. Please verify.

BAL - 7/29, 8/8, 8/25, 9/12

DET - 7/29, 9/6, 9/22

LAA - 7/18, 8/6, 8/25, 9/12

LAD - 7/29, 8/15, 9/1, 9/22

MIL - 7/21, 8/5, 9/4

OAK - 7/18, 8/1, 9/1, 9/16

LAA and OAK both start today!

All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.