Totally new to this system and I have gone back and read many of the pages, but has anyone tried this system with the RL to get better odds? Chasing 5, 6, 7 or 8 games can get very large rather fast and wipe out a bankroll. Since all of these teams are going to be big favorites taking the RL seems to make a bit of sense. Thoughts?
0
Totally new to this system and I have gone back and read many of the pages, but has anyone tried this system with the RL to get better odds? Chasing 5, 6, 7 or 8 games can get very large rather fast and wipe out a bankroll. Since all of these teams are going to be big favorites taking the RL seems to make a bit of sense. Thoughts?
Totally new to this system and I have gone back and read many of the pages, but has anyone tried this system with the RL to get better odds? Chasing 5, 6, 7 or 8 games can get very large rather fast and wipe out a bankroll. Since all of these teams are going to be big favorites taking the RL seems to make a bit of sense. Thoughts?
Never researched RL. You can play the system anyway see fit. The numbers don't below don't lie, but I do understand that sometimes things can and will go wrong.
I'm taking different approach and playing percentage of my bankroll this year rather than straight martingale.
Last season, we did clear 36 of 39 wins within first two games and went to a 4th game just once.
In 2015, we went 14-0 with all the wins within first two games.
Overall, 497 of the 563 wins on the system have been within the first two games.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MoMoney2:
Totally new to this system and I have gone back and read many of the pages, but has anyone tried this system with the RL to get better odds? Chasing 5, 6, 7 or 8 games can get very large rather fast and wipe out a bankroll. Since all of these teams are going to be big favorites taking the RL seems to make a bit of sense. Thoughts?
Never researched RL. You can play the system anyway see fit. The numbers don't below don't lie, but I do understand that sometimes things can and will go wrong.
I'm taking different approach and playing percentage of my bankroll this year rather than straight martingale.
Last season, we did clear 36 of 39 wins within first two games and went to a 4th game just once.
In 2015, we went 14-0 with all the wins within first two games.
Overall, 497 of the 563 wins on the system have been within the first two games.
Never researched RL. You can play the system anyway see fit. The numbers don't below don't lie, but I do understand that sometimes things can and will go wrong.
I'm taking different approach and playing percentage of my bankroll this year rather than straight martingale.
Last season, we did clear 36 of 39 wins within first two games and went to a 4th game just once.
In 2015, we went 14-0 with all the wins within first two games.
Overall, 497 of the 563 wins on the system have been within the first two games.
Excellent info, thanks!
0
Quote Originally Posted by CKP22:
Never researched RL. You can play the system anyway see fit. The numbers don't below don't lie, but I do understand that sometimes things can and will go wrong.
I'm taking different approach and playing percentage of my bankroll this year rather than straight martingale.
Last season, we did clear 36 of 39 wins within first two games and went to a 4th game just once.
In 2015, we went 14-0 with all the wins within first two games.
Overall, 497 of the 563 wins on the system have been within the first two games.
The LAD series on 8/11 is only a 5 game series and doesn't qualify.
Danrules24, My bad. Thanks for the catch. I go over those ten times and still miss something. If you throw my second posting in a spreadsheet, it makes it very easy to follow day by day. You can change the numbers to bet amounts or W/L as they happen to keep track.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Danrules24:
The LAD series on 8/11 is only a 5 game series and doesn't qualify.
Danrules24, My bad. Thanks for the catch. I go over those ten times and still miss something. If you throw my second posting in a spreadsheet, it makes it very easy to follow day by day. You can change the numbers to bet amounts or W/L as they happen to keep track.
Totally new to this system and I have gone back and read many of the pages, but has anyone tried this system with the RL to get better odds? Chasing 5, 6, 7 or 8 games can get very large rather fast and wipe out a bankroll. Since all of these teams are going to be big favorites taking the RL seems to make a bit of sense. Thoughts?
Mo, the same thought crossed my mind a few seasons ago, if the line is too juicy I sometimes convert it to a -1 line (use a runline calculator if need be).....great work CKP ansd Dan, thanks for the effort and sharing!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by MoMoney2:
Totally new to this system and I have gone back and read many of the pages, but has anyone tried this system with the RL to get better odds? Chasing 5, 6, 7 or 8 games can get very large rather fast and wipe out a bankroll. Since all of these teams are going to be big favorites taking the RL seems to make a bit of sense. Thoughts?
Mo, the same thought crossed my mind a few seasons ago, if the line is too juicy I sometimes convert it to a -1 line (use a runline calculator if need be).....great work CKP ansd Dan, thanks for the effort and sharing!!
For what it's worth I will play the RL if the odds are -180 or more and I feel good about the chances of winning by 2+, not a steadfast rule.
Also, this year, I'm only chasing for 2 games. If it goes to 3, I take the loss and start a chase again for games 3-4. We'll see how that plays out. Chasing for 4-6 games is tough.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
For what it's worth I will play the RL if the odds are -180 or more and I feel good about the chances of winning by 2+, not a steadfast rule.
Also, this year, I'm only chasing for 2 games. If it goes to 3, I take the loss and start a chase again for games 3-4. We'll see how that plays out. Chasing for 4-6 games is tough.
For what it's worth I will play the RL if the odds are -180 or more and I feel good about the chances of winning by 2+, not a steadfast rule.
Also, this year, I'm only chasing for 2 games. If it goes to 3, I take the loss and start a chase again for games 3-4. We'll see how that plays out. Chasing for 4-6 games is tough.
Dan - how are you playing that? Games 1 & 2 on separate labby lines and then play game 3 back on the game 1 line and game 4 on the game 2 line?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Danrules24:
For what it's worth I will play the RL if the odds are -180 or more and I feel good about the chances of winning by 2+, not a steadfast rule.
Also, this year, I'm only chasing for 2 games. If it goes to 3, I take the loss and start a chase again for games 3-4. We'll see how that plays out. Chasing for 4-6 games is tough.
Dan - how are you playing that? Games 1 & 2 on separate labby lines and then play game 3 back on the game 1 line and game 4 on the game 2 line?
Dan - how are you playing that? Games 1 & 2 on separate labby lines and then play game 3 back on the game 1 line and game 4 on the game 2 line?
Not running a labby line for this system. I'm doing a straight chase for games 1 & 2, if it goes to game 3 do the same for 3 & 4 after taking the previous 2 game loss. Given the number of games that have cleared historically in the first 2 games, I feel good about this method. Adding in the fact that I will play most games of -180 or more on the RL, I limit the chance of a huge 2 game loss. The record shows that the first 2 game record is 497-66 over it's history. Even if the average 2 game loss was at -160 odds for each game, you would still have a 117 unit profit on games 1 & 2 for the systems history. I'm confident that some of those losses would have averaged less than -160 and we would have picked up some wins at + odds on the RL. We'll see how it goes.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Quote Originally Posted by stickbit:
Dan - how are you playing that? Games 1 & 2 on separate labby lines and then play game 3 back on the game 1 line and game 4 on the game 2 line?
Not running a labby line for this system. I'm doing a straight chase for games 1 & 2, if it goes to game 3 do the same for 3 & 4 after taking the previous 2 game loss. Given the number of games that have cleared historically in the first 2 games, I feel good about this method. Adding in the fact that I will play most games of -180 or more on the RL, I limit the chance of a huge 2 game loss. The record shows that the first 2 game record is 497-66 over it's history. Even if the average 2 game loss was at -160 odds for each game, you would still have a 117 unit profit on games 1 & 2 for the systems history. I'm confident that some of those losses would have averaged less than -160 and we would have picked up some wins at + odds on the RL. We'll see how it goes.
The double dip is not nearly as good for games 1 & 2. We are looking at 80%, 75-18. I also noticed an error on my total numbers since posting. I had shown 90-0 last year but it is 93-0.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
The double dip is not nearly as good for games 1 & 2. We are looking at 80%, 75-18. I also noticed an error on my total numbers since posting. I had shown 90-0 last year but it is 93-0.
And now the fun really begins with the Rockies tonight. This team has been in a free fall for a couple of weeks now. With the juice they'll be laying against SD, in this series, let's hope it gets done tonight.
0
And now the fun really begins with the Rockies tonight. This team has been in a free fall for a couple of weeks now. With the juice they'll be laying against SD, in this series, let's hope it gets done tonight.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.