I actually haven't done that. Perhaps at the end of the season I'll go back and look.
That may actually benefit us more IMO. Out of the 15 1st game wins this year, we may have been able to get a few more wins IF assuming the teams win 1 of their next 3 games and NOT get swept.
0
Quote Originally Posted by CKP22:
I actually haven't done that. Perhaps at the end of the season I'll go back and look.
That may actually benefit us more IMO. Out of the 15 1st game wins this year, we may have been able to get a few more wins IF assuming the teams win 1 of their next 3 games and NOT get swept.
That may actually benefit us more IMO. Out of the 15 1st game wins this year, we may have been able to get a few more wins IF assuming the teams win 1 of their next 3 games and NOT get swept.
The record is 14-2. The losses were by the Yankees and Angels. The two losses were enough to make it unprofitable. The Yankee loss would have been enough to wipe out the 14 wins in one fell swoop. Would have lost around 16 units, on that series alone, if my calculations are correct. The system works as is. No need to get greedy. That's when the problems start.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BookieCrusher88:
That may actually benefit us more IMO. Out of the 15 1st game wins this year, we may have been able to get a few more wins IF assuming the teams win 1 of their next 3 games and NOT get swept.
The record is 14-2. The losses were by the Yankees and Angels. The two losses were enough to make it unprofitable. The Yankee loss would have been enough to wipe out the 14 wins in one fell swoop. Would have lost around 16 units, on that series alone, if my calculations are correct. The system works as is. No need to get greedy. That's when the problems start.
The record is 14-2. The losses were by the Yankees and Angels. The two losses were enough to make it unprofitable. The Yankee loss would have been enough to wipe out the 14 wins in one fell swoop. Would have lost around 16 units, on that series alone, if my calculations are correct. The system works as is. No need to get greedy. That's when the problems start.
Ah thanks for the info.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bruin95:
The record is 14-2. The losses were by the Yankees and Angels. The two losses were enough to make it unprofitable. The Yankee loss would have been enough to wipe out the 14 wins in one fell swoop. Would have lost around 16 units, on that series alone, if my calculations are correct. The system works as is. No need to get greedy. That's when the problems start.
Pirates are last play of season starting tonight. Their best player (McCutcheon) likely will be out of the lineup. While it fits the system, play at your own risk. I won't be playing them.
Record: 22-0 Game 1: 17 Game 2: 4 Game 3: 1
Record since started tracking in 1999: 450-0. 437 wins within first three games.
0
Pirates are last play of season starting tonight. Their best player (McCutcheon) likely will be out of the lineup. While it fits the system, play at your own risk. I won't be playing them.
Record: 22-0 Game 1: 17 Game 2: 4 Game 3: 1
Record since started tracking in 1999: 450-0. 437 wins within first three games.
good call 22, the only way I'll play shitsburg will be on the last game of the series as long as their win-less, and going against a 12 year old all-star
0
good call 22, the only way I'll play shitsburg will be on the last game of the series as long as their win-less, and going against a 12 year old all-star
Could this be this systems first loss in over a decade? I've been saying all along that Pittsburgh didn't belong with the other teams in this system, despite meeting the criteria. Something to consider for next season is if a team that's been down for a long time and just happens to meet the criteria (ala Pittsburgh) might be filtered out. Pittsburgh hasn't had a winning season in over 20 years, but happened to have a great first half. We've all seen what has happened to them in the second half. They've had one of the worst records in baseball. While they haven't cost anyone anything, as yet, they have lost 4 A games and a B. Only one other team has even lost an A game this season. Just imagine how close the Mets came to meeting the criteria. Going into the last series before the break, they were 7 over .500 and playing the Cubs at home. A sweep would have put the Mets into the system. They would have been losers to the system, not once, but twice!! Getting swept at home in two 6 games series. In another home series, they didn't win their first game until game 5 of the homestand. Just something to consider if some surprise teams happen to make it next season.
0
Could this be this systems first loss in over a decade? I've been saying all along that Pittsburgh didn't belong with the other teams in this system, despite meeting the criteria. Something to consider for next season is if a team that's been down for a long time and just happens to meet the criteria (ala Pittsburgh) might be filtered out. Pittsburgh hasn't had a winning season in over 20 years, but happened to have a great first half. We've all seen what has happened to them in the second half. They've had one of the worst records in baseball. While they haven't cost anyone anything, as yet, they have lost 4 A games and a B. Only one other team has even lost an A game this season. Just imagine how close the Mets came to meeting the criteria. Going into the last series before the break, they were 7 over .500 and playing the Cubs at home. A sweep would have put the Mets into the system. They would have been losers to the system, not once, but twice!! Getting swept at home in two 6 games series. In another home series, they didn't win their first game until game 5 of the homestand. Just something to consider if some surprise teams happen to make it next season.
Could this be this systems first loss in over a decade? I've been saying all along that Pittsburgh didn't belong with the other teams in this system, despite meeting the criteria. Something to consider for next season is if a team that's been down for a long time and just happens to meet the criteria (ala Pittsburgh) might be filtered out. Pittsburgh hasn't had a winning season in over 20 years, but happened to have a great first half. We've all seen what has happened to them in the second half. They've had one of the worst records in baseball. While they haven't cost anyone anything, as yet, they have lost 4 A games and a B. Only one other team has even lost an A game this season. Just imagine how close the Mets came to meeting the criteria. Going into the last series before the break, they were 7 over .500 and playing the Cubs at home. A sweep would have put the Mets into the system. They would have been losers to the system, not once, but twice!! Getting swept at home in two 6 games series. In another home series, they didn't win their first game until game 5 of the homestand. Just something to consider if some surprise teams happen to make it next season.
Could it be the system's first in over a decade? Absolutely not.
This offseason, I do research prior to 1999 to see when the last loss was. Congrats to those that followed and made some money.
System complete for season with Pirates win in Game 2.
2012 Record: 23-0 Game 1: 17 Game 2: 5 Game 3: 1
Record since started tracking in 1999: 451-0. 438 wins within first three games.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bruin95:
Could this be this systems first loss in over a decade? I've been saying all along that Pittsburgh didn't belong with the other teams in this system, despite meeting the criteria. Something to consider for next season is if a team that's been down for a long time and just happens to meet the criteria (ala Pittsburgh) might be filtered out. Pittsburgh hasn't had a winning season in over 20 years, but happened to have a great first half. We've all seen what has happened to them in the second half. They've had one of the worst records in baseball. While they haven't cost anyone anything, as yet, they have lost 4 A games and a B. Only one other team has even lost an A game this season. Just imagine how close the Mets came to meeting the criteria. Going into the last series before the break, they were 7 over .500 and playing the Cubs at home. A sweep would have put the Mets into the system. They would have been losers to the system, not once, but twice!! Getting swept at home in two 6 games series. In another home series, they didn't win their first game until game 5 of the homestand. Just something to consider if some surprise teams happen to make it next season.
Could it be the system's first in over a decade? Absolutely not.
This offseason, I do research prior to 1999 to see when the last loss was. Congrats to those that followed and made some money.
System complete for season with Pirates win in Game 2.
2012 Record: 23-0 Game 1: 17 Game 2: 5 Game 3: 1
Record since started tracking in 1999: 451-0. 438 wins within first three games.
Could this be this systems first loss in over a decade? I've been saying all along that Pittsburgh didn't belong with the other teams in this system, despite meeting the criteria. Something to consider for next season is if a team that's been down for a long time and just happens to meet the criteria (ala Pittsburgh) might be filtered out. Pittsburgh hasn't had a winning season in over 20 years, but happened to have a great first half. We've all seen what has happened to them in the second half. They've had one of the worst records in baseball. While they haven't cost anyone anything, as yet, they have lost 4 A games and a B. Only one other team has even lost an A game this season. Just imagine how close the Mets came to meeting the criteria. Going into the last series before the break, they were 7 over .500 and playing the Cubs at home. A sweep would have put the Mets into the system. They would have been losers to the system, not once, but twice!! Getting swept at home in two 6 games series. In another home series, they didn't win their first game until game 5 of the homestand. Just something to consider if some surprise teams happen to make it next season.
While teams do fit the system, I do filter out and don't play all of them. Didn't use the Pirates on any of their last three series. I usually unload on teams I trust.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bruin95:
Could this be this systems first loss in over a decade? I've been saying all along that Pittsburgh didn't belong with the other teams in this system, despite meeting the criteria. Something to consider for next season is if a team that's been down for a long time and just happens to meet the criteria (ala Pittsburgh) might be filtered out. Pittsburgh hasn't had a winning season in over 20 years, but happened to have a great first half. We've all seen what has happened to them in the second half. They've had one of the worst records in baseball. While they haven't cost anyone anything, as yet, they have lost 4 A games and a B. Only one other team has even lost an A game this season. Just imagine how close the Mets came to meeting the criteria. Going into the last series before the break, they were 7 over .500 and playing the Cubs at home. A sweep would have put the Mets into the system. They would have been losers to the system, not once, but twice!! Getting swept at home in two 6 games series. In another home series, they didn't win their first game until game 5 of the homestand. Just something to consider if some surprise teams happen to make it next season.
While teams do fit the system, I do filter out and don't play all of them. Didn't use the Pirates on any of their last three series. I usually unload on teams I trust.
If I want to make my units $100 each and each series is to win 1 unit. What inital bankroll would you recommend?
Would be very tough. If you took just a four-game chase trying to win $100 and if it lost at the average price of -150 that would cost you just about $3800. And that's just four games. Now I know what record is and even on a four-game chase, the record would still be 446-5 dating to when I first tracked in 1999, but very costly unless you have another betting method.
I cut the chase after four games. Last time went past a Game 4 was in 2007. Went to a fifth that year.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bart_:
If I want to make my units $100 each and each series is to win 1 unit. What inital bankroll would you recommend?
Would be very tough. If you took just a four-game chase trying to win $100 and if it lost at the average price of -150 that would cost you just about $3800. And that's just four games. Now I know what record is and even on a four-game chase, the record would still be 446-5 dating to when I first tracked in 1999, but very costly unless you have another betting method.
I cut the chase after four games. Last time went past a Game 4 was in 2007. Went to a fifth that year.
Copyright � 1995 - 2024
CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
