C'mon guys.. don't spoil the thread.. It's a lovely sunny day so just chill!
Sports_network, I mean no offense intended at all but I got to confess, I don't really know what the angle is here ? what is it your suggesting be the main issue with this thread? I thought we were just discussing a certain service and the system results, so far we have done exactly that havn't we? There has been no plays since the ones said. Let me know how I can try help out any more.. again no offense, or direct dig, just unclear as to why it's all getting out of hand!
All the best :)
thank you for your constructive commentary, Please return to the very beginning of the thread and read through it. you'll understand.
If you have any questions, direct them to Lippsman, he is the linesman, and his job is to moderate. The angle? is clearly explained in my commentary through out this thread. i entered with positive concept, it was the thread itself that turned negative; speaking frankly, pcis, and jm are nothing more than bullshit. stick around, and you will find my assessment to be accurate.
0
Quote Originally Posted by UKlad:
C'mon guys.. don't spoil the thread.. It's a lovely sunny day so just chill!
Sports_network, I mean no offense intended at all but I got to confess, I don't really know what the angle is here ? what is it your suggesting be the main issue with this thread? I thought we were just discussing a certain service and the system results, so far we have done exactly that havn't we? There has been no plays since the ones said. Let me know how I can try help out any more.. again no offense, or direct dig, just unclear as to why it's all getting out of hand!
All the best :)
thank you for your constructive commentary, Please return to the very beginning of the thread and read through it. you'll understand.
If you have any questions, direct them to Lippsman, he is the linesman, and his job is to moderate. The angle? is clearly explained in my commentary through out this thread. i entered with positive concept, it was the thread itself that turned negative; speaking frankly, pcis, and jm are nothing more than bullshit. stick around, and you will find my assessment to be accurate.
That's the reason I'm letting this go as far as it has. I'm seeing what the truth factor is here and I must say there are some things that have me concerned right now. I have a way to track things since the start, but I wanted to see exactly what was going to be posted here and on the site.
A few things have not added up that's for sure, but I believe it's just a couple of errors right now. Also the splitting the line of ML and RL has confused a few people. Also, PSIC states that it is up to you to play a split line if you want to. So that clouds things a bit also. Persoanlly I think you should play a split line on anything that's -150 and above.
On the downside though, that seems to be his main plays so far. All juice. Hopefully that will change soon.
0
That's the reason I'm letting this go as far as it has. I'm seeing what the truth factor is here and I must say there are some things that have me concerned right now. I have a way to track things since the start, but I wanted to see exactly what was going to be posted here and on the site.
A few things have not added up that's for sure, but I believe it's just a couple of errors right now. Also the splitting the line of ML and RL has confused a few people. Also, PSIC states that it is up to you to play a split line if you want to. So that clouds things a bit also. Persoanlly I think you should play a split line on anything that's -150 and above.
On the downside though, that seems to be his main plays so far. All juice. Hopefully that will change soon.
thank you for your constructive commentary, Please return to the very beginning of the thread and read through it. you'll understand.
If you have any questions, direct them to Lippsman, he is the linesman, and his job is to moderate. The angle? is clearly explained in my commentary through out this thread. i entered with positive concept, it was the thread itself that turned negative; speaking frankly, pcis, and jm are nothing more than bullshit. stick around, and you will find my assessment to be accurate.
If you're going to rag someone at least get his name correct!
I am pretty sure it's PSIC.
I think someone here got poked in the eye, I better stop!
0
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:
thank you for your constructive commentary, Please return to the very beginning of the thread and read through it. you'll understand.
If you have any questions, direct them to Lippsman, he is the linesman, and his job is to moderate. The angle? is clearly explained in my commentary through out this thread. i entered with positive concept, it was the thread itself that turned negative; speaking frankly, pcis, and jm are nothing more than bullshit. stick around, and you will find my assessment to be accurate.
If you're going to rag someone at least get his name correct!
I am pretty sure it's PSIC.
I think someone here got poked in the eye, I better stop!
Boy their sure seems to be a lot of whining in here about nothing.
I called PSIC yesterday and had a real interesting conversation.
If you look at the "results" page on the website......PSIC went out of his way to contact MY Handicapper to ADD the NY Yankees runline game as a LOSS. In addition, he added the TAMPA BAY runline on the same day as a LOSS even though in the daily email Tampa was CLEARLY listed on the moneyline with an option for a split bet using the runline.
Now I flat out CHALLENGE anyone in here to find a servce or handicapper that would actuall contact a monitoring service and have them ADD LOSSES! It would NEVER happen and everyone in here knows it. I think any issues about integrity and record should be laid to rest right here.
Sports_Network...I highly doubt that you ever talked with PSIC....your actions in here...the whining about moving the thread etc....seems to me that maybe you're a disgruntled capper who is so disappointed in your own performace that you try to tear down successful people to make yourself feel better......You should check with your shrink because that's probably not constructive behavior.
Better yet...since you have all the answers you should start your own thread with your picks every day and lets take a look at how well you do.....we could all retire early!!
Look...all I know is that i've been with PSIC for a few months now and every month I have more in my account than I had the previous month and since jan 15th I've tripled my bankroll. It seems like everyone gets so caught up in records and having a pissing contest about capping that you forget about the bottom line....MAKING MONEY! RIGHT?
0
Boy their sure seems to be a lot of whining in here about nothing.
I called PSIC yesterday and had a real interesting conversation.
If you look at the "results" page on the website......PSIC went out of his way to contact MY Handicapper to ADD the NY Yankees runline game as a LOSS. In addition, he added the TAMPA BAY runline on the same day as a LOSS even though in the daily email Tampa was CLEARLY listed on the moneyline with an option for a split bet using the runline.
Now I flat out CHALLENGE anyone in here to find a servce or handicapper that would actuall contact a monitoring service and have them ADD LOSSES! It would NEVER happen and everyone in here knows it. I think any issues about integrity and record should be laid to rest right here.
Sports_Network...I highly doubt that you ever talked with PSIC....your actions in here...the whining about moving the thread etc....seems to me that maybe you're a disgruntled capper who is so disappointed in your own performace that you try to tear down successful people to make yourself feel better......You should check with your shrink because that's probably not constructive behavior.
Better yet...since you have all the answers you should start your own thread with your picks every day and lets take a look at how well you do.....we could all retire early!!
Look...all I know is that i've been with PSIC for a few months now and every month I have more in my account than I had the previous month and since jan 15th I've tripled my bankroll. It seems like everyone gets so caught up in records and having a pissing contest about capping that you forget about the bottom line....MAKING MONEY! RIGHT?
The bottom line is tracking and seeing what is legit or not. Actually I don't think the RL's should be counted as losses if he's playing a split line, which he is on most of his bigger juice plays. Splitline's make it a -1 line and those one run wins should be a push. That's what makes it a little difficult for those tracking.
I have no reason to doubt PSIC at all. Because I'm sure those losses would of been added afterward, if eyes were not watching.
Right ?
0
The bottom line is tracking and seeing what is legit or not. Actually I don't think the RL's should be counted as losses if he's playing a split line, which he is on most of his bigger juice plays. Splitline's make it a -1 line and those one run wins should be a push. That's what makes it a little difficult for those tracking.
I have no reason to doubt PSIC at all. Because I'm sure those losses would of been added afterward, if eyes were not watching.
Boy their sure seems to be a lot of whining in here about nothing.
I called PSIC yesterday and had a real interesting conversation.
If you look at the "results" page on the website......PSIC went out of his way to contact MY Handicapper to ADD the NY Yankees runline game as a LOSS. In addition, he added the TAMPA BAY runline on the same day as a LOSS even though in the daily email Tampa was CLEARLY listed on the moneyline with an option for a split bet using the runline.
Now I flat out CHALLENGE anyone in here to find a servce or handicapper that would actuall contact a monitoring service and have them ADD LOSSES! It would NEVER happen and everyone in here knows it. I think any issues about integrity and record should be laid to rest right here.
Sports_Network...I highly doubt that you ever talked with PSIC....your actions in here...the whining about moving the thread etc....seems to me that maybe you're a disgruntled capper who is so disappointed in your own performace that you try to tear down successful people to make yourself feel better......You should check with your shrink because that's probably not constructive behavior.
Better yet...since you have all the answers you should start your own thread with your picks every day and lets take a look at how well you do.....we could all retire early!!
Look...all I know is that i've been with PSIC for a few months now and every month I have more in my account than I had the previous month and since jan 15th I've tripled my bankroll. It seems like everyone gets so caught up in records and having a pissing contest about capping that you forget about the bottom line....MAKING MONEY! RIGHT?
0
Quote Originally Posted by cpk007:
Boy their sure seems to be a lot of whining in here about nothing.
I called PSIC yesterday and had a real interesting conversation.
If you look at the "results" page on the website......PSIC went out of his way to contact MY Handicapper to ADD the NY Yankees runline game as a LOSS. In addition, he added the TAMPA BAY runline on the same day as a LOSS even though in the daily email Tampa was CLEARLY listed on the moneyline with an option for a split bet using the runline.
Now I flat out CHALLENGE anyone in here to find a servce or handicapper that would actuall contact a monitoring service and have them ADD LOSSES! It would NEVER happen and everyone in here knows it. I think any issues about integrity and record should be laid to rest right here.
Sports_Network...I highly doubt that you ever talked with PSIC....your actions in here...the whining about moving the thread etc....seems to me that maybe you're a disgruntled capper who is so disappointed in your own performace that you try to tear down successful people to make yourself feel better......You should check with your shrink because that's probably not constructive behavior.
Better yet...since you have all the answers you should start your own thread with your picks every day and lets take a look at how well you do.....we could all retire early!!
Look...all I know is that i've been with PSIC for a few months now and every month I have more in my account than I had the previous month and since jan 15th I've tripled my bankroll. It seems like everyone gets so caught up in records and having a pissing contest about capping that you forget about the bottom line....MAKING MONEY! RIGHT?
If you are talking about Morrison, I think you could be right! Not much thought or handicapping goes into his daily releases. How does he make so much damn money?
He had Wash. the other day and decided that it didn't meet his new criteria a.k.a. filters.
When he comes with something it will get posted, and then we can finally start the comparison.
0
If you are talking about Morrison, I think you could be right! Not much thought or handicapping goes into his daily releases. How does he make so much damn money?
He had Wash. the other day and decided that it didn't meet his new criteria a.k.a. filters.
When he comes with something it will get posted, and then we can finally start the comparison.
He <JM> thus far has said that Washington was close to meeting his system requirements not just once but twice now and he chose not to pursure the wager because of the RPI differential BUT actually if we had played according to his system and wagered on the +1 1/2 we would have won 2 times already.........I CANT WAIT TO REALLY GET THE JOHN MORRISON MLB SEASON GOING !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0
He <JM> thus far has said that Washington was close to meeting his system requirements not just once but twice now and he chose not to pursure the wager because of the RPI differential BUT actually if we had played according to his system and wagered on the +1 1/2 we would have won 2 times already.........I CANT WAIT TO REALLY GET THE JOHN MORRISON MLB SEASON GOING !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yeah, that hurt a little, but my opposites $50 parlay paid $446.09, It's always a good idea to have an opposites parlay when you're betting 3 or more teams, at least that's what I've always been told.
No Lipps, no chasing here (the money that is)! The email read "Lower your bet by 10% from yesterday"
Same 3 teams!
0
Yeah, that hurt a little, but my opposites $50 parlay paid $446.09, It's always a good idea to have an opposites parlay when you're betting 3 or more teams, at least that's what I've always been told.
No Lipps, no chasing here (the money that is)! The email read "Lower your bet by 10% from yesterday"
Yeah, that hurt a little, but my opposites $50 parlay paid $446.09, It's always a good idea to have an opposites parlay when you're betting 3 or more teams, at least that's what I've always been told.
No Lipps, no chasing here (the money that is)! The email read "Lower your bet by 10% from yesterday"
Same 3 teams!
Is this a mis-print? For two weeks youve been touting psic, and produced virtually nothing of value..THEN, when you(or psic) go O-3 you have the audacity to make a ridiculous statement, that your fading "yourself", on the play's your clearly touting people to purchase??? and stating you made a 50 dollar parlay wager, fading plays you purchased from psic
"it's always good to have an "opposite" parlay when betting 3 or more teams" WRONG...this is without a doubt, the stupidest concept I have ever read on Covers.com, and find it very hard to understand any handicapper that would agree with your amatuer statement... this is way below sea level.
"at least that's what Ive "always" been told"...by who? PSIC?
maybe it's time you notified, Ringling Bro's-Barnum&Bailey....
0
Quote Originally Posted by MarlonB:
Yeah, that hurt a little, but my opposites $50 parlay paid $446.09, It's always a good idea to have an opposites parlay when you're betting 3 or more teams, at least that's what I've always been told.
No Lipps, no chasing here (the money that is)! The email read "Lower your bet by 10% from yesterday"
Same 3 teams!
Is this a mis-print? For two weeks youve been touting psic, and produced virtually nothing of value..THEN, when you(or psic) go O-3 you have the audacity to make a ridiculous statement, that your fading "yourself", on the play's your clearly touting people to purchase??? and stating you made a 50 dollar parlay wager, fading plays you purchased from psic
"it's always good to have an "opposite" parlay when betting 3 or more teams" WRONG...this is without a doubt, the stupidest concept I have ever read on Covers.com, and find it very hard to understand any handicapper that would agree with your amatuer statement... this is way below sea level.
"at least that's what Ive "always" been told"...by who? PSIC?
maybe it's time you notified, Ringling Bro's-Barnum&Bailey....
Yeah, that hurt a little, but my opposites $50 parlay paid $446.09, It's always a good idea to have an opposites parlay when you're betting 3 or more teams, at least that's what I've always been told.
No Lipps, no chasing here (the money that is)! The email read "Lower your bet by 10% from yesterday"
Same 3 teams!
I've never heard of fading your own picks before. To each thier own I guess.
I thought that PSIC's plays were supposed to show up on Myhandicapper a few minutes after the games started. I didn't see them till this morning. Also only two of the three losses is listed.
There seems to be a good deal of errors concerning the posting of plays on the site. Thanks for posting them today. Are those the only plays ?
BOL today
0
Quote Originally Posted by MarlonB:
Yeah, that hurt a little, but my opposites $50 parlay paid $446.09, It's always a good idea to have an opposites parlay when you're betting 3 or more teams, at least that's what I've always been told.
No Lipps, no chasing here (the money that is)! The email read "Lower your bet by 10% from yesterday"
Same 3 teams!
I've never heard of fading your own picks before. To each thier own I guess.
I thought that PSIC's plays were supposed to show up on Myhandicapper a few minutes after the games started. I didn't see them till this morning. Also only two of the three losses is listed.
There seems to be a good deal of errors concerning the posting of plays on the site. Thanks for posting them today. Are those the only plays ?
I actually play psic also...and i've been with him for almost 1 year and even tho he hasn't said anything in the email yesterday about a opposite parlay.. I just had a bad feeling since hes been doing so well with MLB so far.. I just had to play the opposite parlay he talks about ALL THE TIME. I only wish i had played a bit more... I only coverd 50% of my money yesterday. I started betting 500 per game since NBA..we built it up to 1k a game for mlb..and yesterday could have been a disaster with a 7500 loss but only lost around 4k...( i'm playing the Continuation with NBA labrochere line ) i seriously hope he comes back strong... I have another opposite for today as well...this time covering 2/3 of my bet...
0
I actually play psic also...and i've been with him for almost 1 year and even tho he hasn't said anything in the email yesterday about a opposite parlay.. I just had a bad feeling since hes been doing so well with MLB so far.. I just had to play the opposite parlay he talks about ALL THE TIME. I only wish i had played a bit more... I only coverd 50% of my money yesterday. I started betting 500 per game since NBA..we built it up to 1k a game for mlb..and yesterday could have been a disaster with a 7500 loss but only lost around 4k...( i'm playing the Continuation with NBA labrochere line ) i seriously hope he comes back strong... I have another opposite for today as well...this time covering 2/3 of my bet...
It's just a little protection Lipps, protect the bankroll! I've only been gambling for 22 years, I guess you learn a lot of things along the way.
I don't care about myhandicapper.com, I'm posting his plays like you asked and that's it.
As far as his plays today, yes the 3 are the only ones, so far.
GL
Well that's the whole reason I wanted you or someone to post the plays here. Because if he is saying on his website that the plays are being tracked and they are not even posted on the website till the games are over that's a bit suspect. And with you posting losses that were not even reported that really raises questions.
So I am quite glad that you are taking your time to do this so we know the real record.
Thanks again.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MarlonB:
It's just a little protection Lipps, protect the bankroll! I've only been gambling for 22 years, I guess you learn a lot of things along the way.
I don't care about myhandicapper.com, I'm posting his plays like you asked and that's it.
As far as his plays today, yes the 3 are the only ones, so far.
GL
Well that's the whole reason I wanted you or someone to post the plays here. Because if he is saying on his website that the plays are being tracked and they are not even posted on the website till the games are over that's a bit suspect. And with you posting losses that were not even reported that really raises questions.
So I am quite glad that you are taking your time to do this so we know the real record.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.